runlikehell at DIF

*Kia* wrote:

Cigar wrote:

true lilly wrote:Yep, all those Mods, all over the world, with all those friends in high places... CAN'T SPEAK WITH one little woman, who was important enough for tintin to personally spy out, important enough to for tintin to put hits out on, that BECAUSE she keeps surviving, WHILE her forewarnings keep coming to be, Team Tintin/Icke now have to resort to simply hoping folk forget, she's still kicking, and still kicking 'their' ASS... Bit hard for folk to forget, when tintin still poaches my posts, but doesn't quote or credit me (as he always does of his lie selling partners), because my posts reveal the truth he tries to bury in his twisted, Very Masonic, letters & numbers game.

lol'z cig
That Fukin Tin man's got a lot to answer for, I hope he realises what he's subjected us all to, a fukin Frankenstein poster?
Read some Dribble in my time

Dribble Dribble Dribble

Ciggy wrote:

Cigar wrote:I really have no idea what Lilly is talking about. She or whoever it is seems like a very mixed up individual that doesn't care about anybody but themselves. What their achievement about writing this whole thread exactly is it totally beats me.

I just don't get it, maybe it's some kind of attention seeking?

I agree.

Ciggy wrote:"Kosher kanackas of pangea" ...PMSL!!!

And all of our flooded towns - imagine if we sunk deep, small surface area=minimal evaporation dams and cannals around them, like covered UNDER the roads that get WASHED AWAY Now, but would collect and store water in the wet, to use in the dry, rather than BEING A DESTRUCTIVE FLOOD, WASTED STRAIGHT INTO THE SEA! Oh but we CAN AND DO dig MASSIVE tunnels UNDER WATER FOR CARS and to collect water from out at SEA (that we PISS OUT FRESH WATER INTO, UNused) to DESALT AT GREAT EXPENSE.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=86338&page=316

Everybody, Loves Sod..!!! wrote:

And all of our flooded towns - imagine if we sunk deep, small surface area=minimal evaporation dams and cannals around them, like covered UNDER the roads that get WASHED AWAY Now, but would collect and store water in the wet, to use in the dry, rather than BEING A DESTRUCTIVE FLOOD, WASTED STRAIGHT INTO THE SEA! Oh but we CAN AND DO dig MASSIVE tunnels UNDER WATER FOR CARS and to collect water from out at SEA (that we PISS OUT FRESH WATER INTO, UNused) to DESALT AT GREAT EXPENSE.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=86338&page=316

true lilly wrote:So, you DIF MODS like, runlikehell, merlincove, i_am, measle-weasle, and DIF MEMBERS like ownoiz, ozpixie, nosfaratu-DJ, who do tintin's bidding, do you really believe readers haven't noticed how much MAJOR GLOBAL FUTURE NEWS I'd posted to watch for, long before it became Current 'news', that 'you' all have to avoid covering in 'Today's News', for fear of readers remembering 'you' ALL ATTACKED ME FOR FOREWARNING OF? Do 'you' really believe readers can't see that tintin, cori and Co. ARE USING THE SAME, HYPNOTIC, TOOLS of DECEPTION and PARALISING THREATS that PROMOTE SUBMISSION TO THE BEAST? Well sorry, but tintin can't REPEATEDLY ANNOUNCE that AUSTRALIA IS ZION, AND REPEATEDLY CURSE ISRAEL, without a few Wise and Loyal Australians UNDERSTANDING HOW TO RECOGNISE THE ENEMIES BETRAYING US, AT HOME AND ABROAD.

true lilly wrote:I should start jumping in everyone else's threads with these actual examples of why no one should read 'them' ...

Ciggy wrote:

Cigar wrote:I really have no idea what Lilly is talking about. She or whoever it is seems like a very mixed up individual that doesn't care about anybody but themselves. What their achievement about writing this whole thread exactly is it totally beats me.

I just don't get it, maybe it's some kind of attention seeking?

I agree.

Ciggy wrote:"Kosher kanackas of pangea" ...PMSL!!!

NOT ONLY OFF TOPIC, BUT QUOTING THE VOICES IN YOUR HEAD AGAIN... And cigar, get the attention you seek by starting a thread folk want to read, don't highjack other threads with your spiteful BS

true lilly wrote:Crap on your crap Jason. Still hoping folk won't care to see for themselves, WHY GANGS OF FULLTIME NETworkers NEED to keep loading my threads with 'THEIR OWN' LYING WORDS and RELIGIONS, LYING AGAIN that they're mine, BUT NEVER DARING TO LINK TO ANY OF MY YEARS OF POSTS that 'you' KNOW ANSWER 'your' 'questions' and MAKE A MOCKERY OF 'your' MOCKERY OF ME, FOR THE INSANE BS 'you' LIE, and LIBALOUSLY STICK MY NAME TO. Oh and to any INDEPENDANT THINKERS who may stumble in here: NOTE WHAT 'they' IGNOR in my posts here, that sets 'them' off on 'their' BITTER, RANTING, OFF TOPIC, PERSONAL (IF THEY WERE TRUE), ATTACKS.

be happy I even answer you madam...
I admit what I am,on the edge,see,that's honesty and credibility...You,like other schizo's...can't see you're cracked and delusional...Don't flatter yourself or bullshit your way out...I looked at your conspiracy industry thread years ago,I got through three post...before blacklisting you from further reads.When SOL asked me to go for Mod,I said I have to read shit postings,I did'nt want it on other grounds too...but you were always one of the deterrants.

Your news...hahahahaha...I laugh at the term Boozeletters...but yours is from out your arse...

true lilly wrote:Nah, Jason, there's a whole list of 'names' who don't have your drug-adled excuse for being evil dicks.

Billy Ruben wrote:

true lilly wrote:Nah, Jason, there's a whole list of 'names' who don't have your drug-adled excuse for being evil dicks.

...it's idiots like you that make drugs compulsory to handle reality...I'd so suicide,being married to you...you drive me insane on a forum...maybe domestic violence...yes...can feel it.

true lilly wrote:

Billy Ruben wrote:

true lilly wrote:Nah, Jason, there's a whole list of 'names' who don't have your drug-adled excuse for being evil dicks.

...it's idiots like you that make drugs compulsory to handle reality...I'd so suicide,being married to you...you drive me insane on a forum...maybe domestic violence...yes...can feel it.

so you post xet more evidence of what a WEAK, LOW, BULLY YOU ARE, and still expect folk to believe your lies about my character. Thanks for the further boost to my credibility

true lilly wrote:

Billy Ruben wrote:

true lilly wrote:Nah, Jason, there's a whole list of 'names' who don't have your drug-adled excuse for being evil dicks.

...it's idiots like you that make drugs compulsory to handle reality...I'd so suicide,being married to you...you drive me insane on a forum...maybe domestic violence...yes...can feel it.

so you post xet more evidence of what a WEAK, LOW, BULLY YOU ARE, and still expect folk to believe your lies about my character. Thanks for the further boost to my credibility

Ciggy wrote:

true lilly wrote:

Billy Ruben wrote:

true lilly wrote:Nah, Jason, there's a whole list of 'names' who don't have your drug-adled excuse for being evil dicks.

...it's idiots like you that make drugs compulsory to handle reality...I'd so suicide,being married to you...you drive me insane on a forum...maybe domestic violence...yes...can feel it.

so you post xet more evidence of what a WEAK, LOW, BULLY YOU ARE, and still expect folk to believe your lies about my character. Thanks for the further boost to my credibility

It was a sympathy fook for your credibility, that's how Billy rolls.

Now here's yer swat on the fibonacci arse:

Ciggy wrote:

I am writing this post as a member, not as a moderator.

In one corner we have those who want total freedom of expression and in the opposite corner we have those who want more control and in the centre we have appeals from those who just want the forum to be a place where manners and general social graces are observed.

However I imagine if we had a private interview with everyone, most if not all would believe they were justified in some way for their posts. Here in lies the dilemma.

This forum is a matrix of personalities, ideas and agendas. If its not what you want, then its up to you. The change has to start with each individual. You cannot expect to have either full self expression without allowing this to others, nor can you expect control unless you are willing to accept it over your posts. Ironic really as this forum is all about breaking the control over us and people taking back their power. How many people want to take all that responsibility?
__________________
Truth is the child of Time.

Billy Ruben wrote:...Must admit,with the new placement of Mods...very impressed with this rose bearer...

Ozpixie Said:

I am writing this post as a member, not as a moderator.

In one corner we have those who want total freedom of expression and in the opposite corner we have those who want more control and in the centre we have appeals from those who just want the forum to be a place where manners and general social graces are observed.

However I imagine if we had a private interview with everyone, most if not all would believe they were justified in some way for their posts. Here in lies the dilemma.

This forum is a matrix of personalities, ideas and agendas. If its not what you want, then its up to you. The change has to start with each individual. You cannot expect to have either full self expression without allowing this to others, nor can you expect control unless you are willing to accept it over your posts. Ironic really as this forum is all about breaking the control over us and people taking back their power. How many people want to take all that responsibility?
__________________
Truth is the child of Time.

...best I've seen for a long time...the webmaster might get with it,eventually...piss off the clique groups...individuals on merit...not favouritism...down with salemanship...up on psychology...don't know who you are...
but that's an assett right there...you may hope after all...Good on you Miss Pixie...



not that I want anything...just very surprised.

true lilly wrote:

Billy Ruben wrote:...Must admit,with the new placement of Mods...very impressed with this rose bearer...

Ozpixie Said:

I am writing this post as a member, not as a moderator.

In one corner we have those who want total freedom of expression and in the opposite corner we have those who want more control and in the centre we have appeals from those who just want the forum to be a place where manners and general social graces are observed.

However I imagine if we had a private interview with everyone, most if not all would believe they were justified in some way for their posts. Here in lies the dilemma.

This forum is a matrix of personalities, ideas and agendas. If its not what you want, then its up to you. The change has to start with each individual. You cannot expect to have either full self expression without allowing this to others, nor can you expect control unless you are willing to accept it over your posts. Ironic really as this forum is all about breaking the control over us and people taking back their power. How many people want to take all that responsibility?
__________________
Truth is the child of Time.

...best I've seen for a long time...the webmaster might get with it,eventually...piss off the clique groups...individuals on merit...not favouritism...down with salemanship...up on psychology...don't know who you are...
but that's an assett right there...you may hope after all...Good on you Miss Pixie...



not that I want anything...just very surprised.

]hee hee, ozpixie's public post 'as a member', at DIF, means the Mods are are getting A LOT of Private COMPLAINTS (because Public Questioning is BANNED and BAN-'WORTHY'), about HEAVY HANDED CENSORSIP .... That OZPIXIE MUST DO TO BE A 'moderator'=CENSOR .... And THAT IMPRESSES 'YOU' .... Hee hee ...

Ciggy wrote:She ate one too many of 'er dog's biscuits.

true lilly wrote:Ha ha, funny guys - still think you can tack YOUR TRINITY/EGYPT RELIGION'S MYTHS, to me and my posts. Ha ha, funny.