Home
Latest images
Search
Register
Log inAnd Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
+2
Ciggy
true lilly
6 posters
Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of 7 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:19 am
true lilly wrote:Health Services UNION...
well I have warned folk for decades
that YOUR MOST PRIVATE INFORMATION,
is NOT Private...and, that,
VERY BAD people USE IT for
VERY BAD reasons...and NOT ONLY for
ROBBING YOUR CHILDREN...true lilly wrote:...poisoning of a church official and his young family by a rival...
...someone had been repeatedly entering his Stirling home
and tampering with food...
His family, including three young children aged five to 12,...
"The report was passed on and some detectives contacted us
and sent around a CSI crew.
"Their advice was,
`Just change the locks and get your family out of danger and forget about it'.
"I wasn't willing to do that because I thought,
`If someone is willing to poison us, then who knows what they will do;
I need to know who it is', so I persisted."
In July the victim went looking for a covert security camera and bought one on eBay.
The digital alarm clock, complete with a concealed, motion-activated camera, cost him $30.
...uncovered a quantity of glyphosate weed killer - No-Grow 450 - syringes,
two firearm silencers, a Taser, a small quantity of ammunition, a
home-made .410 calibre handgun and a key that fitted the victim's front door.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/church-leader-poisons-rival/story-e6frea6u-1226288214719
McKallisti Of The Sods wrote:true lilly wrote:
...uncovered a quantity of glyphosate weed killer - No-Grow 450 - syringes,
two firearm silencers, a Taser, a small quantity of ammunition, a
home-made .410 calibre handgun and a key that fitted the victim's front
door. [/color]
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/church-leader-poisons-rival/story-e6frea6u-1226288214719
Hmmmn Just Added This To The Ole Bug Out Bag...!!!
St Vincent Hospital patient details
used to beg for money
by:Jonathan Marshall and Brigid O'Connell
From:The Sunday Telegraph
March 04, 2012
12:00AM
ST VINCENT'S Hospital fundraisers have used patients' personal details to beg for bequests.
The "very successful" scheme ran for "years and years" until a
patient with knowledge of privacy legislation complained to the
Melbourne hospital's management.
The practice was revealed at a confidential convention held by
the Fundraising Institute of Australia, where Australia's leading charities
were taught how to pressure the vulnerable, elderly and dying
with emotive tactics and psychological profiling to bequeath their estates.
Participants at the four-day conference, including a journalist from Sydney's Sunday Telegraph, heard that charities are transporting the elderly to visit lawyers,
paying for legal fees to draft wills, contacting donors on birthdays and
at Christmas to make them feel "special" and educating that "greedy"
families must be frozen out of wills.
St Vincent's Foundation head of donor development David Cook, told
the conference the hospital had previously given patient information to
the foundation, an external organisation - a practice considered controversial
by many in the Victorian medical community.
Telemarketing was now the foundation's preferred method of raising money, Mr Cook said.
"Would you believe it, there are people out there who like to be called?"
Mr Cook later told some delegates that
the end of patient record-sharing was unfortunate.
The practice would have continued undetected if not for
a "mishandled" complaint from a former patient, he said.
A spokesman for the Victorian Office of Health Services Commissioner said
health information could not be shared without a patient's permission.
On Friday, Mr Cook said: "It seemed to me to be obvious that patient
information would be shared between the hospital and the foundation."
St Vincent's Foundation director Bill Younger said medical records were not used
for fundraising.
"We advise patients of the Privacy Act and we seek their preference for
future contact regarding fundraising. Their wishes are always respected," he said.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
daddlepoms Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:39 am
study ruddy, black & puddy
then frejya you farted
then frejya you farted
daddlepoms- Posts : 651
Join date : 2010-06-26
Location : three's a crowd but four's allowed
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:13 pm
Baby 'abortion' argument is crossing the line
by: Andrew Bolt
From: Herald Sun
March 05, 2012 12:00AM
The argument put forward by ethicists about aborting babies outside the womb
clearly crosses the line, says Andrew Bolt. Herald Sun
I HAVE written about cases so shocking that whatever you think of
abortion - for, against or agonised like me - I thought you'd agreed.
Yes, here a boundary was crossed.
This, at least, is too much like murder.
There was the 2000 case of the "abortion" of Jessica, a healthy 32-week-old
foetus, after her deeply distressed mother threatened suicide if made to give birth.
The mother thought Jessica could be a dwarf, which meant bad luck.
But on "delivery" of the girl, killed in the womb, a nurse at Melbourne's Royal Women's recorded: "The baby doesn't look small."
I thought this would at least prompt restrictions on the abortion of healthy babies so close to birth.
I was wrong.
Later, I reported on Jessica Jane, aborted in Darwin after her mother decided she'd prefer her career.
Jessica Jane was expelled from the womb - alive.
She was placed in a stainless-steel dish by a horrified midwife and left in
a room, where she cried until she died, alone, 80 minutes later.
I thought this might force us to consider how carelessly we said "foetus"
when discussing late-term abortions, when we're actually talking about
babies who, outside the womb, can cry - and take an hour to die.
Wrong again.
I was just as wrong to assume that publicising other cases - like the
rescue of an aborted baby, still alive, from a bin at Sydney's Westmead
hospital - might make us agree such deaths involve a profound wrong.
Yes, a mother has a right to her body, but surely these babies had a right to their lives.
But again no debate.
Or so I thought.
Now the Journal of Medical Ethics has published a paper by professional
"ethicists" that confronts the very hypocrisy that troubled me - that we
permit the killing of children in the womb who we'd rush to protect if outside it.
But here is how Alberto Giubilini of Monash University and Dr Francesca Minerva of Melbourne University say that hypocrisy should be overcome.
"What we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases
where abortion is (permissible), including cases where the newborn is not disabled."
That's right.
Since we already permit the killing of babies inside the womb, why not outside it, too?
As the authors say: "If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for
the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the
foetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant
and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when
it is at the stage of a newborn."
A legal reason for killing your baby could be, say, unexpected losses at the pokies, leaving you short of cash for nappies.
That's how I interpret this bit: "We do not suggest any threshold (beyond which you can't
kill your healthy baby), as it depends on the neurological development of newborns.
"However, ... if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that
taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then people
should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford."
So, it's unclear how long you would have to lawfully kill a child who becomes too expensive.
Two weeks?
Two years?
Indeed, there is no obvious boundary once you've rubbed out the absolute line in the sand: thou shalt not kill the baby in the womb.
Yes, this is the slippery slope argument that progressives hate, because it gets in the way when they argue for same sex marriage or euthanasia.
Yet, the defence of the journal's article by its editor, Julian Savulescu, shows how slippery that slope can be, since he offers the "they're all doing it anyway" excuse that can licence
any mass barbarity.
"The arguments presented, in fact, are largely not new and have been presented repeatedly in the academic literature."
In fact, what shocks Savulescu is not a proposal to allow the murder of babies, but that people should be angered by it.
"What is disturbing is not the arguments in this paper nor its publication in an ethics journal. It is the hostile, abusive, threatening responses that it has elicited."
Poor ethicists.
How scary if some people feel entitled to threaten you, as if you were just some baby.
After all, even in a world where a baby's life isn't sacred, an ethicist's is.
Isn't it?
by: Andrew Bolt
From: Herald Sun
March 05, 2012 12:00AM
The argument put forward by ethicists about aborting babies outside the womb
clearly crosses the line, says Andrew Bolt. Herald Sun
I HAVE written about cases so shocking that whatever you think of
abortion - for, against or agonised like me - I thought you'd agreed.
Yes, here a boundary was crossed.
This, at least, is too much like murder.
There was the 2000 case of the "abortion" of Jessica, a healthy 32-week-old
foetus, after her deeply distressed mother threatened suicide if made to give birth.
The mother thought Jessica could be a dwarf, which meant bad luck.
But on "delivery" of the girl, killed in the womb, a nurse at Melbourne's Royal Women's recorded: "The baby doesn't look small."
I thought this would at least prompt restrictions on the abortion of healthy babies so close to birth.
I was wrong.
Later, I reported on Jessica Jane, aborted in Darwin after her mother decided she'd prefer her career.
Jessica Jane was expelled from the womb - alive.
She was placed in a stainless-steel dish by a horrified midwife and left in
a room, where she cried until she died, alone, 80 minutes later.
I thought this might force us to consider how carelessly we said "foetus"
when discussing late-term abortions, when we're actually talking about
babies who, outside the womb, can cry - and take an hour to die.
Wrong again.
I was just as wrong to assume that publicising other cases - like the
rescue of an aborted baby, still alive, from a bin at Sydney's Westmead
hospital - might make us agree such deaths involve a profound wrong.
Yes, a mother has a right to her body, but surely these babies had a right to their lives.
But again no debate.
Or so I thought.
Now the Journal of Medical Ethics has published a paper by professional
"ethicists" that confronts the very hypocrisy that troubled me - that we
permit the killing of children in the womb who we'd rush to protect if outside it.
But here is how Alberto Giubilini of Monash University and Dr Francesca Minerva of Melbourne University say that hypocrisy should be overcome.
"What we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases
where abortion is (permissible), including cases where the newborn is not disabled."
That's right.
Since we already permit the killing of babies inside the womb, why not outside it, too?
As the authors say: "If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for
the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the
foetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant
and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when
it is at the stage of a newborn."
A legal reason for killing your baby could be, say, unexpected losses at the pokies, leaving you short of cash for nappies.
That's how I interpret this bit: "We do not suggest any threshold (beyond which you can't
kill your healthy baby), as it depends on the neurological development of newborns.
"However, ... if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that
taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then people
should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford."
So, it's unclear how long you would have to lawfully kill a child who becomes too expensive.
Two weeks?
Two years?
Indeed, there is no obvious boundary once you've rubbed out the absolute line in the sand: thou shalt not kill the baby in the womb.
Yes, this is the slippery slope argument that progressives hate, because it gets in the way when they argue for same sex marriage or euthanasia.
Yet, the defence of the journal's article by its editor, Julian Savulescu, shows how slippery that slope can be, since he offers the "they're all doing it anyway" excuse that can licence
any mass barbarity.
"The arguments presented, in fact, are largely not new and have been presented repeatedly in the academic literature."
In fact, what shocks Savulescu is not a proposal to allow the murder of babies, but that people should be angered by it.
"What is disturbing is not the arguments in this paper nor its publication in an ethics journal. It is the hostile, abusive, threatening responses that it has elicited."
Poor ethicists.
How scary if some people feel entitled to threaten you, as if you were just some baby.
After all, even in a world where a baby's life isn't sacred, an ethicist's is.
Isn't it?
true lilly wrote:Don't like 'your' dark little secrets being posted...just got to spam 'em all away...
stupid really, considering they are not secret...and these are the actual people that 'tintin/Ciggy/ Billy Ruben et al', are so desperate to defend
An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007
shows her with Ms Gillard apparently at a function for Emily's Listtrue lilly wrote:Britain to ban wild animals from circuses
CIRCUSES in Britain will be banned from using wild animals in their shows under new government plans announced today. Read more
Killing newborns 'comparable to abortion'
KILLING newborn babies should be allowed if the mother wishes, Australian philosophers argue. Read more
This is from Piers Akerman's blog.
Piers, Talking of lies and manipulations, how come things like this paper which was authored by Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne and
Francesca Minerva at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne are never revealed to the general public, like many other things that are hidden from public scrutiny?
Piers,
A paper published in the
Journal of Medical Ethics argues
that abortion should be extended to make the
killing of newborn babies permissible,
even if the baby is perfectly healthy,
in a shocking example of how
the medical establishment is still dominated by
a eugenicist mindset.
Rick of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 01 Mar 12 (07:16am)
tombrown replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (09:55am)
Rick I dont know what to say,I wonder if have died
in my sleep and woken up in hell.They want to kill babies?I havent cried
in years,what the hell is wrong with humanity?How can God possibly love
monsters like this?A beautiful,wonderful world my arse.We live in a
hell run by demons.
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:03am)
I can answer that for you Rick.
It’s because of militant feminists and because of Emily’s List and the power base they’ve established in the Labor Party.
This is what they say on their website:
We believe women must have control over their own bodies and choices
in their lives. Reproductive Freedom empowers women and men to choose
if, when and how to begin the important journey into parenthood, without
fear of discrimination, coercion or violence.
This is from a quick google - Life Network Australia - Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Emily’s List holds up abortion as a trophy of women’s reproductive
rights, espouses the rhetoric of “choice” and poses as an organisation
fighting for equality of women. At first glance, why wouldn’t any
company jump at the opportunity to sponsor them?
If, however, you look a little more closely, you may just see something more sinister.
It was Emily List’s, Candy Broad, that initially tabled an abortion
Bill that would legalise abortion up until birth - but it was put aside
until after a federal election.
Emily List’s Maxine Morand then retabled it. It was her Emily’s List
colleagues, Joan Kirner, Jacinta Allan (Bendigo East) and others that
argued passionately in support of the Bill.
When challenged on her support of the legislation, during the last
Victorian election, Ms Allan refused to comment. Her constituents flatly
refused to believe that she would have supported abortion up until
birth. With the protection of her local Bendigo newspaper, she remains
unaccountable.
During the abortion debate in Parliament, images of aborted babies were
viewed. Abortion survivor, Gianna Jessen, gave her amazing story of
surviving an abortion and asked “Where were my rights as a female?”
But Emily’s List MPs remained determined.
Peter Kavanagh, former Member of the Democratic Labour Party, described
how he was told by some ALP MPs that although they did not want to
support the Bill, they were told (by the ALP) that they would not be
endorsed for reselection if they did not - so much for a conscience vote!
Former ALP Member for Bendigo West, Bob Cameron, voted against the Bill.
He has since been replaced by Emily List’s Maree Edwards.
The legislation was passed and numerous amendments were put forward -
some 60, in fact. It was the rejection of these amendments that gives us
a look into what Emily’s List really stands for.
Given they had succeeded in legalising abortion in Victoria, one would
think that a political organisation that champions the rights of women
would have supported the following amendments: Parental consent for
girls under 18 years (parental consent is required for piercings);
mandatory reporting of suspected sexual abuse; support/counselling for
women considering abortion; a “cooling off period” for women considering
late term abortion. But no - each Emily’s List Member of Parliament
voted each of these amendments down.
Emily Listers also opposed: The banning of partial birth abortions
(banned in the U.S); provision of medical care for aborted babies born
alive; anaesthetic for babies aborted late term; and limitting abortion
availability to 20 or 24 weeks (babies can survive outside the womb at
this stage).
In espousing to be “pro choice”, there is no evidence of Emily’s List
having any interest in any “choice” other than abortion. Where do they
show such determination and passion for adoption? Are they fighting to
have red tape surrounding adoption cut?
Where are they lobbying for pregnancy support centres? Parenting classes?
It is blaringly obvious that Emily’s List is “pro choice” alright...as long as that “choice” is abortion!
The champagne flowed for those Emily Listers who had secured their
ultimate “trophy”, but for the women, families and babies of Victoria
and Australia, it was a very sad day. Legal protection for the unborn
and also for women had been stripped.
THIS
is where the Chinese whispers of hate against Tony Abbott come from.
THIS is why he is described as DANGEROUS.
They condemn anyone who has the unmitigated gall to think that abortion
is not a badge of honour to be worn lightly and without consequence or
who thinks that women are now being railroaded into abortions without
being shown that there are alternatives IF they wish to choose them.
Emily’s List are emblematic of
the mentality and moral idiocy of the Left.
Either agree with us or we’ll crucify you.
Hence, Rick, that report will never see the light of day.
Jim replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:26am)
Rick, late term abortions are bad enough, but this
recommendation by two AUSTRALIAN university public servants is
tantamount to LEGAL MURDER!
These two academics (their names suggest they are Italian or French)
should be immediately fired from their positions and investigated for
inciting cold calculated MURDER.
This is not acceptable in a civilised society!
DT replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46am)
Rick I am shocked.
Road Runner replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:52am)
Great post Caz. It’s frightening to believe that there are people out there who think like this.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (02:14pm)
Thanks Caz, I never thought Emily’s List would see the light of day.
I have told people of this disgusting group and they are understandably
shocked. They will not be voting for Gillard or any of the idiots and
liars in the Labor government
~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (06:39pm)
No, ‘thank you’ scotty. I’d never even heard of
Emily’s List until I read one of your comments and did a little
investigating. They profess to lobby for the rights of women but in
reality abortion is the be all and end all. They say they are
‘pro-choice’ but God help you if you suggest that women, especially
young women, should be told that such a decision is life altering and
not just a bra-burning badge of freedom. Emily the Strange.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (08:24pm)
That is true Caz. I wanted to post the article with
a link but every time I checked, the info changed. One day I was
searching google, Emily’s List found me, when I typed in Gillard.
Your mentioning Emily Strange, I am very familiar with the brand.
Someone near and dear to me had me buying clothing and what have you
during her emo phase. Thankful the phase did not last and I am glad she
never wanted lady gaga gear.Cheers!
~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:14pm)
I had a feeling you’d know what I was talking
about, scotty. Don’t you just love the phases of teenagers. I haven’t
been ‘fortunate’ enough to experience an emo phase but I always chuckle
when I think of them having to look back on those photos when they’re
50! I read that her birthday was lovely. Has she settled into uni OK?
Jim Common Sense Non Progressive replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46pm)
Why are our tax dollars being wasted on abortion?
Pregnancy is not a disease as far as I’m aware. The money would be
better spent on treating REAL diseases such as mental illness, dementia etc.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
daddlepoms- Posts : 651
Join date : 2010-06-26
Location : three's a crowd but four's allowed
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:33 pm
Column - Stifling free speech won’t guarantee good speech
Andrew Bolt – Monday, March 05, 12 (07:41 am)
THE Gillard Government’s media inquiry
threatens not only our freedom to speak,
but to hear and decide for ourselves. But why?
Its report last week, by retired judge Ray Finkelstein, proposes a super media-cop,
funded by government, to police all that’s said and written in the media.
It would even have the power to disappear you - or, rather, your words -
by requiring offending artilces to removed from the Internet, never to be read again.
But what suddenly happened that free speech is thought a threat,
needing even more oppressive controls?
Finkelstein offers five “striking instances” of “wrongful harm” caused by
“unreliable or inaccurate reporting, breach of privacy, and the failure to
properly take into account the defenceless”.
Its list is astonishingly thin.
“A minister of the Crown has his homosexuality exposed. He is forced to resign.”
(The NSW minister was found visiting a bath house, is not “defenceless”
and was not forced to resign, but chose to.)
“A chief commissioner of police is the victim of false accusations about
his job performance fed to the news media by a ministerial adviser ...
He is forced to resign.”
(Victorian chief commissioner Simon Overland, not “defenceless”,
chose to resign after largely valid criticisms of, among other things, his
decision to sack his deputy and his release of incomplete crime statistics.)
“Nude photographs said to be of a female politician contesting a seat in
a state election are published with no checking of their veracity. The
photographs are fakes.”
(The paper which ran the fake pictures of Pauline Hanson,
who isn’t “defenceless”, apologised, paid damages and was caned by its readers.
What more should have been done?)
The report cites two other alleged media sins - a teenager victimised
over her sexual relationship with a sportsman, and a mother wrongly
implicated in the deaths of her children.
Were these sins not properly punished? We are not told.
Or does Finkelstein think his News Media Council would terrorise journalists into never making mistakes in the first place?
I say that because of this bizarre claim:
“Most newspapers steadfastly maintain that there is no need to
strengthen the means by which they are to be held publicly accountable
...
“(But) many who made submissions to the inquiry also think the press is not perfect, and argued that its performance was often wanting. Both claims cannot be correct.”
Actually, they can, if you accept mistakes are inevitable, but punishments already exist.
They can, if you realise that more punishments won’t stop mistakes, but will chill debate.
They can, if you realise the real threat isn’t free speech, but more laws to control it.
_______________________________
BUT, remember,
'The Education'=INDOCTRINATION OUR TAXES PAY
to have INFLICTED ON OUR CHILDREN, isn't 'The Media',
so not only can 'they' continue 'their' brainwashing, but,
OUR DUTY to bring to light (THROUGH PUBLIC MEDIA),
the BALD FACED LIES and OUTRIGHT EVIL HORRORS
'they' 'teach' OUR CHILDREN THEY MUST ACCEPT (if,
they want to 'Pass'), IS ALSO REMOVED.
WOMEN MINISTERS,
DEMANDING BABY MURDER BE LEGAL,
have NOT BEEN FORCED TO RESIGN...
one SUPPORTER of THAT EVIL,
IS EVEN MADE PRIME MINISTER!
Baby 'abortion' argument is crossing the line
by: Andrew Bolt
From: Herald Sun
March 05, 2012 12:00AM
The argument put forward by ethicists about aborting babies outside the womb
clearly crosses the line, says Andrew Bolt. Herald Sun
I HAVE written about cases so shocking that whatever you think of
abortion - for, against or agonised like me - I thought you'd agreed.
Yes, here a boundary was crossed.
This, at least, is too much like murder.
There was the 2000 case of the "abortion" of Jessica, a healthy 32-week-old
foetus, after her deeply distressed mother threatened suicide if made to give birth.
The mother thought Jessica could be a dwarf, which meant bad luck.
But on "delivery" of the girl, killed in the womb, a nurse at Melbourne's Royal Women's recorded: "The baby doesn't look small."
I thought this would at least prompt restrictions on the abortion of healthy babies
so close to birth.
I was wrong.
Later, I reported on Jessica Jane, aborted in Darwin
after her mother decided she'd prefer her career.
Jessica Jane was expelled from the womb - alive.
She was placed in a stainless-steel dish by a horrified midwife and left
in a room, where she cried until she died, alone, 80 minutes later.
I thought this might force us to consider how carelessly we said "foetus"
when discussing late-term abortions, when we're actually talking about
babies who, outside the womb, can cry - and take an hour to die.
Wrong again.
I was just as wrong to assume that publicising other cases - like the
rescue of an aborted baby, still alive, from a bin at Sydney's Westmead
hospital - might make us agree such deaths involve a profound wrong.
Yes, a mother has a right to her body, but surely these babies had a right to their lives.
But again no debate.
Or so I thought.
Now the Journal of Medical Ethics has published a paper by professional
"ethicists" that confronts the very hypocrisy that troubled me - that we
permit the killing of children in the womb who we'd rush to protect if outside it.
But here is how Alberto Giubilini of Monash University and Dr Francesca Minerva of Melbourne University say that hypocrisy should be overcome.
"What we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases
where abortion is (permissible), including cases where the newborn is not disabled."
That's right.
Since we already permit the killing of babies inside the womb, why not outside it, too?
As the authors say: "If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for
the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the
foetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant
and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when
it is at the stage of a newborn."
A legal reason for killing your baby could be, say, unexpected losses at the pokies, leaving you short of cash for nappies.
That's how I interpret this bit: "We do not suggest any threshold (beyond which you can't
kill your healthy baby), as it depends on the neurological development of newborns.
"However, ... if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that
taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then people
should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford."
So, it's unclear how long you would have to lawfully kill a child who becomes too expensive.
Two weeks?
Two years?
Indeed, there is no obvious boundary once you've rubbed out the absolute line in the sand: thou shalt not kill the baby in the womb.
Yes, this is the slippery slope argument that progressives hate, because it gets in the way when they argue for same sex marriage or euthanasia.
Yet, the defence of the journal's article by its editor, Julian Savulescu, shows how slippery that slope can be, since he offers the "they're all doing it anyway" excuse that can licence
any mass barbarity.
"The arguments presented, in fact, are largely not new and have been presented repeatedly in the academic literature."
In fact, what shocks Savulescu is not a proposal to allow the murder of babies, but that people should be angered by it.
"What is disturbing is not the arguments in this paper nor its publication in an ethics journal. It is the hostile, abusive, threatening responses that it has elicited."
Poor ethicists.
How scary if some people feel entitled to threaten you, as if you were just some baby.
After all, even in a world where a baby's life isn't sacred, an ethicist's is.
Isn't it?
Don't like 'your' dark little secrets being posted...just got to spam 'em all away...
stupid really, considering they are not secret...and these are the actual people that 'tintin/Ciggy/ Billy Ruben et al', are so desperate to defend , by attacking me...
An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007
shows her with Ms Gillard apparently at a function for
Emily's List
What she (Gillard) thinks…
… on late-term abortion
“It’s not the business of politicians
to make sweeping statements on issues like these.
People have to confront all sorts
of different circumstances –
profound disability, for example.
For me, it’s about letting an individual
make that decision with her family.
It’s not my place to preach.
I’m generally in favour of
allowing women to make decisions
and not having politicians make them for them.”
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:q4I8ijDtKYAJ:aww.ninemsn.com.au/news/inthemag/7935812/julia-gillard-the-prime-minister-on-dating-drugs-and-life-with-tim+gilliar+gillard+on+late+term+abortions&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&client=firefox-a
Britain to ban wild animals from circuses
CIRCUSES in Britain will be banned from using wild animals in their shows under new government plans announced today. Read more
Killing newborns 'comparable to abortion'
KILLING newborn babies should be allowed if the mother wishes, Australian philosophers argue. Read more
This is from Piers Akerman's blog.
Piers, Talking of lies and manipulations, how come things like this paper which was authored by Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne and
Francesca Minerva at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne are never revealed to the general public, like many other things that are hidden from public scrutiny?
Piers,
A paper published in the
Journal of Medical Ethics argues
that abortion should be extended to make the
killing of newborn babies permissible,
even if the baby is perfectly healthy,
in a shocking example of how
the medical establishment is still dominated by
a eugenicist mindset.
Rick of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 01 Mar 12 (07:16am)
tombrown replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (09:55am)
Rick I dont know what to say,I wonder if have died
in my sleep and woken up in hell.They want to kill babies?
I havent cried in years, what the hell is wrong with humanity?
How can God possibly love monsters like this?
A beautiful,wonderful world my arse.
We live in a hell run by demons.
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:03am)
I can answer that for you Rick.
It’s because of militant feminists and
because of Emily’s List and
the power base they’ve established in the Labor Party.
This is what they say on their website:
We believe women must have control over their own bodies and choices
in their lives. Reproductive Freedom empowers women and men to choose
if, when and how to begin the important journey into parenthood, without
fear of discrimination, coercion or violence.
This is from a quick google - Life Network Australia - Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Emily’s List holds up abortion as a trophy of women’s reproductive
rights, espouses the rhetoric of “choice” and poses as an organisation
fighting for equality of women. At first glance, why wouldn’t any
company jump at the opportunity to sponsor them?
If, however, you look a little more closely,
you may just see something more sinister.
It was Emily List’s, Candy Broad, that initially tabled an abortion
Bill that would legalise abortion up until birth - but it was put aside
until after a federal election.
Emily List’s Maxine Morand then retabled it. It was her Emily’s List
colleagues, Joan Kirner, Jacinta Allan (Bendigo East) and others that
argued passionately in support of the Bill.
When challenged on her support of the legislation,
during the last Victorian election, Ms Allan refused to comment.
Her constituents flatly refused to believe that she would have
supported abortion up until birth.
With the protection of her local Bendigo newspaper,
she remains unaccountable.During the abortion debate in Parliament,
images of aborted babies were viewed.
Abortion survivor, Gianna Jessen,
gave her amazing story of
surviving an abortion and asked
“Where were my rights as a female?”
But Emily’s List MPs remained determined.Peter Kavanagh, former Member of the Democratic Labour Party,
described how he was told by some ALP MPs that
although they did not want to support the Bill,
they were told (by the ALP) that they
would not be endorsed for reselection
if they did not - so much for a conscience vote!
Former ALP Member for Bendigo West, Bob Cameron, voted against the Bill.
He has since been replaced by Emily List’s Maree Edwards.
The legislation was passed and numerous amendments were put forward -
some 60, in fact. It was the rejection of these amendments that gives us
a look into what Emily’s List really stands for.
Given they had succeeded in legalising abortion in Victoria, one would
think that a political organisation that champions the rights of women
would have supported the following amendments: Parental consent for
girls under 18 years (parental consent is required for piercings);
mandatory reporting of suspected sexual abuse; support/counselling for
women considering abortion; a “cooling off period” for women considering
late term abortion. But no - each Emily’s List Member of Parliament
voted each of these amendments down.
Emily Listers also opposed:
The banning of partial birth abortions (banned in the U.S);
provision of medical care for aborted babies born alive;
anaesthetic for babies aborted late term;
and limitting abortion availability to 20 or 24 weeks
(babies can survive outside the womb at this stage).
In espousing to be “pro choice”, there is no evidence of Emily’s List
having any interest in any “choice” other than abortion. Where do they
show such determination and passion for adoption? Are they fighting to
have red tape surrounding adoption cut?
Where are they lobbying for pregnancy support centres? Parenting classes?
It is blaringly obvious that
Emily’s List is “pro choice” alright...
as long as that “choice” is abortion!
The champagne flowed for those Emily Listers who had secured their
ultimate “trophy”, but for the women, families and babies of Victoria
and Australia, it was a very sad day. Legal protection for the unborn
and also for women had been stripped.
THIS is where the Chinese whispers of
hate against Tony Abbott come from.
THIS is why he is described as DANGEROUS.
They condemn anyone who has the unmitigated gall to think that abortion
is not a badge of honour to be worn lightly and without consequence or
who thinks that women are now being railroaded into abortions without
being shown that there are alternatives IF they wish to choose them.
Emily’s List are emblematic of
the mentality and moral idiocy of the Left.
Either agree with us or we’ll crucify you.
Hence, Rick, that report will never see the light of day.
Jim replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:26am)
Rick, late term abortions are bad enough, but this
recommendation by two AUSTRALIAN university public servants is
tantamount to LEGAL MURDER!
These two academics (their names suggest they are Italian or French)
should be immediately fired from their positions and investigated for
inciting cold calculated MURDER.
This is not acceptable in a civilised society!
DT replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46am)
Rick I am shocked.
Road Runner replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:52am)
Great post Caz. It’s frightening to believe that there are people out there who think like this.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (02:14pm)
Thanks Caz, I never thought Emily’s List would see the light of day.
I have told people of this disgusting group and they are understandably
shocked. They will not be voting for Gillard or any of the idiots and
liars in the Labor government
~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (06:39pm)
No, ‘thank you’ scotty. I’d never even heard of
Emily’s List until I read one of your comments and did a little
investigating. They profess to lobby for the rights of women but in
reality abortion is the be all and end all. They say they are
‘pro-choice’ but God help you if you suggest that women, especially
young women, should be told that such a decision is life altering and
not just a bra-burning badge of freedom. Emily the Strange.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (08:24pm)
That is true Caz. I wanted to post the article with
a link but every time I checked, the info changed. One day I was
searching google, Emily’s List found me, when I typed in Gillard.
Your mentioning Emily Strange, I am very familiar with the brand.
Someone near and dear to me had me buying clothing and what have you
during her emo phase. Thankful the phase did not last and I am glad she
never wanted lady gaga gear. Cheers!
~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:14pm)
I had a feeling you’d know what I was talking
about, scotty. Don’t you just love the phases of teenagers. I haven’t
been ‘fortunate’ enough to experience an emo phase but I always chuckle
when I think of them having to look back on those photos when they’re
50! I read that her birthday was lovely. Has she settled into uni OK?
Jim Common Sense Non Progressive replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46pm)
Why are our tax dollars being wasted on abortion?
Pregnancy is not a disease as far as I’m aware. The money would be
better spent on treating REAL diseases such as mental illness, dementia etc.
NOTE: I do NOT have ANY control of how my posts appear,
or what they contain, after I click, 'send'.
Often the posts I try, very many times, to edit back to what
I intend to present, contain NO MENTION of being edited at all,
let alone how many times they are edited by me, AND OTHERS.
But I am NOT the only one who has their posts altered.
And it is all part of INVENTING 'evidence' to sell 'their' DEMAND
for TOTAL CONTROL over the exchange of information needed
for FREE and FAIR DEBATE.
And [when] thou [art] spoiled 7703 , what wilt thou do 6213 ?
Though thou clothest 3847 thyself with crimson 8144,
though thou deckest 5710 thee with ornaments 5716 of gold 2091,
though thou rentest 7167 thy face 5869 with painting 6320,
in vain 7723 shalt thou make thyself fair 3302 ;
[thy] lovers 5689 will despise 3988 thee,
they will seek 1245 thy life 5315.
For I have heard 8085 a voice 6963 as of a woman in travail 2470 ,
[and] the anguish 6869 as of her that bringeth forth her first child 1069 ,
the voice 6963 of the daughter 1323 of Zion 6726,
[that] bewaileth 3306 herself, [that] spreadeth 6566 her hands 3709,
[saying], Woe 188 [is] me now!
for my soul 5315 is wearied 5888 because of murderers 2026 .
Andrew Bolt – Monday, March 05, 12 (07:41 am)
THE Gillard Government’s media inquiry
threatens not only our freedom to speak,
but to hear and decide for ourselves. But why?
Its report last week, by retired judge Ray Finkelstein, proposes a super media-cop,
funded by government, to police all that’s said and written in the media.
It would even have the power to disappear you - or, rather, your words -
by requiring offending artilces to removed from the Internet, never to be read again.
But what suddenly happened that free speech is thought a threat,
needing even more oppressive controls?
Finkelstein offers five “striking instances” of “wrongful harm” caused by
“unreliable or inaccurate reporting, breach of privacy, and the failure to
properly take into account the defenceless”.
Its list is astonishingly thin.
“A minister of the Crown has his homosexuality exposed. He is forced to resign.”
(The NSW minister was found visiting a bath house, is not “defenceless”
and was not forced to resign, but chose to.)
“A chief commissioner of police is the victim of false accusations about
his job performance fed to the news media by a ministerial adviser ...
He is forced to resign.”
(Victorian chief commissioner Simon Overland, not “defenceless”,
chose to resign after largely valid criticisms of, among other things, his
decision to sack his deputy and his release of incomplete crime statistics.)
“Nude photographs said to be of a female politician contesting a seat in
a state election are published with no checking of their veracity. The
photographs are fakes.”
(The paper which ran the fake pictures of Pauline Hanson,
who isn’t “defenceless”, apologised, paid damages and was caned by its readers.
What more should have been done?)
The report cites two other alleged media sins - a teenager victimised
over her sexual relationship with a sportsman, and a mother wrongly
implicated in the deaths of her children.
Were these sins not properly punished? We are not told.
Or does Finkelstein think his News Media Council would terrorise journalists into never making mistakes in the first place?
I say that because of this bizarre claim:
“Most newspapers steadfastly maintain that there is no need to
strengthen the means by which they are to be held publicly accountable
...
“(But) many who made submissions to the inquiry also think the press is not perfect, and argued that its performance was often wanting. Both claims cannot be correct.”
Actually, they can, if you accept mistakes are inevitable, but punishments already exist.
They can, if you realise that more punishments won’t stop mistakes, but will chill debate.
They can, if you realise the real threat isn’t free speech, but more laws to control it.
_______________________________
BUT, remember,
'The Education'=INDOCTRINATION OUR TAXES PAY
to have INFLICTED ON OUR CHILDREN, isn't 'The Media',
so not only can 'they' continue 'their' brainwashing, but,
OUR DUTY to bring to light (THROUGH PUBLIC MEDIA),
the BALD FACED LIES and OUTRIGHT EVIL HORRORS
'they' 'teach' OUR CHILDREN THEY MUST ACCEPT (if,
they want to 'Pass'), IS ALSO REMOVED.
WOMEN MINISTERS,
DEMANDING BABY MURDER BE LEGAL,
have NOT BEEN FORCED TO RESIGN...
one SUPPORTER of THAT EVIL,
IS EVEN MADE PRIME MINISTER!
Baby 'abortion' argument is crossing the line
by: Andrew Bolt
From: Herald Sun
March 05, 2012 12:00AM
The argument put forward by ethicists about aborting babies outside the womb
clearly crosses the line, says Andrew Bolt. Herald Sun
I HAVE written about cases so shocking that whatever you think of
abortion - for, against or agonised like me - I thought you'd agreed.
Yes, here a boundary was crossed.
This, at least, is too much like murder.
There was the 2000 case of the "abortion" of Jessica, a healthy 32-week-old
foetus, after her deeply distressed mother threatened suicide if made to give birth.
The mother thought Jessica could be a dwarf, which meant bad luck.
But on "delivery" of the girl, killed in the womb, a nurse at Melbourne's Royal Women's recorded: "The baby doesn't look small."
I thought this would at least prompt restrictions on the abortion of healthy babies
so close to birth.
I was wrong.
Later, I reported on Jessica Jane, aborted in Darwin
after her mother decided she'd prefer her career.
Jessica Jane was expelled from the womb - alive.
She was placed in a stainless-steel dish by a horrified midwife and left
in a room, where she cried until she died, alone, 80 minutes later.
I thought this might force us to consider how carelessly we said "foetus"
when discussing late-term abortions, when we're actually talking about
babies who, outside the womb, can cry - and take an hour to die.
Wrong again.
I was just as wrong to assume that publicising other cases - like the
rescue of an aborted baby, still alive, from a bin at Sydney's Westmead
hospital - might make us agree such deaths involve a profound wrong.
Yes, a mother has a right to her body, but surely these babies had a right to their lives.
But again no debate.
Or so I thought.
Now the Journal of Medical Ethics has published a paper by professional
"ethicists" that confronts the very hypocrisy that troubled me - that we
permit the killing of children in the womb who we'd rush to protect if outside it.
But here is how Alberto Giubilini of Monash University and Dr Francesca Minerva of Melbourne University say that hypocrisy should be overcome.
"What we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases
where abortion is (permissible), including cases where the newborn is not disabled."
That's right.
Since we already permit the killing of babies inside the womb, why not outside it, too?
As the authors say: "If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for
the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the
foetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant
and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when
it is at the stage of a newborn."
A legal reason for killing your baby could be, say, unexpected losses at the pokies, leaving you short of cash for nappies.
That's how I interpret this bit: "We do not suggest any threshold (beyond which you can't
kill your healthy baby), as it depends on the neurological development of newborns.
"However, ... if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that
taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then people
should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford."
So, it's unclear how long you would have to lawfully kill a child who becomes too expensive.
Two weeks?
Two years?
Indeed, there is no obvious boundary once you've rubbed out the absolute line in the sand: thou shalt not kill the baby in the womb.
Yes, this is the slippery slope argument that progressives hate, because it gets in the way when they argue for same sex marriage or euthanasia.
Yet, the defence of the journal's article by its editor, Julian Savulescu, shows how slippery that slope can be, since he offers the "they're all doing it anyway" excuse that can licence
any mass barbarity.
"The arguments presented, in fact, are largely not new and have been presented repeatedly in the academic literature."
In fact, what shocks Savulescu is not a proposal to allow the murder of babies, but that people should be angered by it.
"What is disturbing is not the arguments in this paper nor its publication in an ethics journal. It is the hostile, abusive, threatening responses that it has elicited."
Poor ethicists.
How scary if some people feel entitled to threaten you, as if you were just some baby.
After all, even in a world where a baby's life isn't sacred, an ethicist's is.
Isn't it?
Don't like 'your' dark little secrets being posted...just got to spam 'em all away...
stupid really, considering they are not secret...and these are the actual people that 'tintin/Ciggy/ Billy Ruben et al', are so desperate to defend
, by attacking me... An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007
shows her with Ms Gillard apparently at a function for
Emily's List
What she (Gillard) thinks…
… on late-term abortion
“It’s not the business of politicians
to make sweeping statements on issues like these.
People have to confront all sorts
of different circumstances –
profound disability, for example.
For me, it’s about letting an individual
make that decision with her family.
It’s not my place to preach.
I’m generally in favour of
allowing women to make decisions
and not having politicians make them for them.”
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:q4I8ijDtKYAJ:aww.ninemsn.com.au/news/inthemag/7935812/julia-gillard-the-prime-minister-on-dating-drugs-and-life-with-tim+gilliar+gillard+on+late+term+abortions&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&client=firefox-a
Britain to ban wild animals from circuses
CIRCUSES in Britain will be banned from using wild animals in their shows under new government plans announced today. Read more
Killing newborns 'comparable to abortion'
KILLING newborn babies should be allowed if the mother wishes, Australian philosophers argue. Read more
This is from Piers Akerman's blog.
Piers, Talking of lies and manipulations, how come things like this paper which was authored by Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne and
Francesca Minerva at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne are never revealed to the general public, like many other things that are hidden from public scrutiny?
Piers,
A paper published in the
Journal of Medical Ethics argues
that abortion should be extended to make the
killing of newborn babies permissible,
even if the baby is perfectly healthy,
in a shocking example of how
the medical establishment is still dominated by
a eugenicist mindset.
Rick of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 01 Mar 12 (07:16am)
tombrown replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (09:55am)
Rick I dont know what to say,I wonder if have died
in my sleep and woken up in hell.They want to kill babies?
I havent cried in years, what the hell is wrong with humanity?
How can God possibly love monsters like this?
A beautiful,wonderful world my arse.
We live in a hell run by demons.
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:03am)
I can answer that for you Rick.
It’s because of militant feminists and
because of Emily’s List and
the power base they’ve established in the Labor Party.
This is what they say on their website:
We believe women must have control over their own bodies and choices
in their lives. Reproductive Freedom empowers women and men to choose
if, when and how to begin the important journey into parenthood, without
fear of discrimination, coercion or violence.
This is from a quick google - Life Network Australia - Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Emily’s List holds up abortion as a trophy of women’s reproductive
rights, espouses the rhetoric of “choice” and poses as an organisation
fighting for equality of women. At first glance, why wouldn’t any
company jump at the opportunity to sponsor them?
If, however, you look a little more closely,
you may just see something more sinister.
It was Emily List’s, Candy Broad, that initially tabled an abortion
Bill that would legalise abortion up until birth - but it was put aside
until after a federal election.
Emily List’s Maxine Morand then retabled it. It was her Emily’s List
colleagues, Joan Kirner, Jacinta Allan (Bendigo East) and others that
argued passionately in support of the Bill.
When challenged on her support of the legislation,
during the last Victorian election, Ms Allan refused to comment.
Her constituents flatly refused to believe that she would have
supported abortion up until birth.
With the protection of her local Bendigo newspaper,
she remains unaccountable.During the abortion debate in Parliament,
images of aborted babies were viewed.
Abortion survivor, Gianna Jessen,
gave her amazing story of
surviving an abortion and asked
“Where were my rights as a female?”
But Emily’s List MPs remained determined.Peter Kavanagh, former Member of the Democratic Labour Party,
described how he was told by some ALP MPs that
although they did not want to support the Bill,
they were told (by the ALP) that they
would not be endorsed for reselection
if they did not - so much for a conscience vote!
Former ALP Member for Bendigo West, Bob Cameron, voted against the Bill.
He has since been replaced by Emily List’s Maree Edwards.
The legislation was passed and numerous amendments were put forward -
some 60, in fact. It was the rejection of these amendments that gives us
a look into what Emily’s List really stands for.
Given they had succeeded in legalising abortion in Victoria, one would
think that a political organisation that champions the rights of women
would have supported the following amendments: Parental consent for
girls under 18 years (parental consent is required for piercings);
mandatory reporting of suspected sexual abuse; support/counselling for
women considering abortion; a “cooling off period” for women considering
late term abortion. But no - each Emily’s List Member of Parliament
voted each of these amendments down.
Emily Listers also opposed:
The banning of partial birth abortions (banned in the U.S);
provision of medical care for aborted babies born alive;
anaesthetic for babies aborted late term;
and limitting abortion availability to 20 or 24 weeks
(babies can survive outside the womb at this stage).
In espousing to be “pro choice”, there is no evidence of Emily’s List
having any interest in any “choice” other than abortion. Where do they
show such determination and passion for adoption? Are they fighting to
have red tape surrounding adoption cut?
Where are they lobbying for pregnancy support centres? Parenting classes?
It is blaringly obvious that
Emily’s List is “pro choice” alright...
as long as that “choice” is abortion!
The champagne flowed for those Emily Listers who had secured their
ultimate “trophy”, but for the women, families and babies of Victoria
and Australia, it was a very sad day. Legal protection for the unborn
and also for women had been stripped.
THIS is where the Chinese whispers of
hate against Tony Abbott come from.
THIS is why he is described as DANGEROUS.
They condemn anyone who has the unmitigated gall to think that abortion
is not a badge of honour to be worn lightly and without consequence or
who thinks that women are now being railroaded into abortions without
being shown that there are alternatives IF they wish to choose them.
Emily’s List are emblematic of
the mentality and moral idiocy of the Left.
Either agree with us or we’ll crucify you.
Hence, Rick, that report will never see the light of day.
Jim replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (10:26am)
Rick, late term abortions are bad enough, but this
recommendation by two AUSTRALIAN university public servants is
tantamount to LEGAL MURDER!
These two academics (their names suggest they are Italian or French)
should be immediately fired from their positions and investigated for
inciting cold calculated MURDER.
This is not acceptable in a civilised society!
DT replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46am)
Rick I am shocked.
Road Runner replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:52am)
Great post Caz. It’s frightening to believe that there are people out there who think like this.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (02:14pm)
Thanks Caz, I never thought Emily’s List would see the light of day.
I have told people of this disgusting group and they are understandably
shocked. They will not be voting for Gillard or any of the idiots and
liars in the Labor government
~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (06:39pm)
No, ‘thank you’ scotty. I’d never even heard of
Emily’s List until I read one of your comments and did a little
investigating. They profess to lobby for the rights of women but in
reality abortion is the be all and end all. They say they are
‘pro-choice’ but God help you if you suggest that women, especially
young women, should be told that such a decision is life altering and
not just a bra-burning badge of freedom. Emily the Strange.
scotty replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (08:24pm)
That is true Caz. I wanted to post the article with
a link but every time I checked, the info changed. One day I was
searching google, Emily’s List found me, when I typed in Gillard.
Your mentioning Emily Strange, I am very familiar with the brand.
Someone near and dear to me had me buying clothing and what have you
during her emo phase. Thankful the phase did not last and I am glad she
never wanted lady gaga gear.
Cheers!~scotty~
Caz replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:14pm)
I had a feeling you’d know what I was talking
about, scotty. Don’t you just love the phases of teenagers. I haven’t
been ‘fortunate’ enough to experience an emo phase but I always chuckle
when I think of them having to look back on those photos when they’re
50! I read that her birthday was lovely. Has she settled into uni OK?
Jim Common Sense Non Progressive replied to Rick
Thu 01 Mar 12 (11:46pm)
Why are our tax dollars being wasted on abortion?
Pregnancy is not a disease as far as I’m aware. The money would be
better spent on treating REAL diseases such as mental illness, dementia etc.
NOTE: I do NOT have ANY control of how my posts appear,
or what they contain, after I click, 'send'.
Often the posts I try, very many times, to edit back to what
I intend to present, contain NO MENTION of being edited at all,
let alone how many times they are edited by me, AND OTHERS.
But I am NOT the only one who has their posts altered.
And it is all part of INVENTING 'evidence' to sell 'their' DEMAND
for TOTAL CONTROL over the exchange of information needed
for FREE and FAIR DEBATE.
And [when] thou [art] spoiled 7703 , what wilt thou do 6213 ?
Though thou clothest 3847 thyself with crimson 8144,
though thou deckest 5710 thee with ornaments 5716 of gold 2091,
though thou rentest 7167 thy face 5869 with painting 6320,
in vain 7723 shalt thou make thyself fair 3302 ;
[thy] lovers 5689 will despise 3988 thee,
they will seek 1245 thy life 5315.
For I have heard 8085 a voice 6963 as of a woman in travail 2470 ,
[and] the anguish 6869 as of her that bringeth forth her first child 1069 ,
the voice 6963 of the daughter 1323 of Zion 6726,
[that] bewaileth 3306 herself, [that] spreadeth 6566 her hands 3709,
[saying], Woe 188 [is] me now!
for my soul 5315 is wearied 5888 because of murderers 2026 .
Last edited by true lilly on Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
daddlepoms Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:01 pm
rods from sod 
daddlepoms- Posts : 651
Join date : 2010-06-26
Location : three's a crowd but four's allowed
Ciggy the FINKlestein...
true lilly Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:15 am
See what and whom, I've been up against all these years.
Bugger debate. There is no debate.
We've been drowning in real world evidence for years.
7 years and still they have no counter argument,
so hey, No argument, No debate, No expression of Independent opinion.
Simply make it illegal to disagree with BALD FACED LIES.
Finklestein’s media council: will sceptics be censored?
Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, March 06, 12 (12:07 am)
Australian Climate Madness warns the Finkelstein report could lead to warming sceptics being censored by the proposed new News Media Council. And it is right.
In detaling the alleged sins of the media, Finkelstein strays way
beyond his competence in assessing what’s bias in the climate debate,
and what is a legiitimate protest against overwhelming and deceitful
propaganda and an utterly useless and ruinous tax:
<blockquote>
4.33 One of the conclusions reached in the report (a particularly loaded one by by the far-Left Australian Centre for Independent Journalism) was this:
<blockquote>The two biggest News Ltd tabloids—the Herald
Sun and the Daily Telegraph—have been so biased in their coverage that
it is fair to say they ‘campaigned’ against the policy rather than
covered it. </blockquote></blockquote>
Finkelstein even cites sympathetically Robert Manne, a fervent alarmist
with zero qualifications in climate science and little apparent
knowledge of the issues in contention:
<blockquote>4.40 For instance, the Inquiry heard from Professor Robert Manne who,
earlier in 2011, had written an extensive critique of The Australian
newspaper in Quarterly Essay entitled ‘Bad News: Murdoch’s Australian
and the Shaping of the Nation’ that examined seven case studies of the
newspaper’s coverage of issues.
4.41 One of his case studies concerned coverage of climate change
policy and his findings mirrored those of the Australian Centre for
Independent Journalism. Professor Manne’s research found that articles
unfavourable to action on climate change outnumbered favourable articles
by a ratio of four to one.
4.42 In his response to Professor Manne’s work, Paul Kelly who is The
Australian’s editor-?at-?large, did not refute Manne’s statistics.
Instead, he argued that Manne’s position was based on a ‘rejection of
debate’ about the science of climate change:
<blockquote>One reason for the public’s backlash making carbon pricing
so unpopular was the precise attitude [Manne] took.
While pretending to be rational his rejection of debate was really faith-based dogmatism and the Australian public didn’t like being told what to think by patronising experts. </blockquote></blockquote>
Note that Finkelstein makes no comment at all about the far more overwhelming bias of, say, The Age, which reports the climate debate from a pro-warmist perspective so one-sided that even its own staff passed a statement of protest against their editor-in-chief,
after he virtually took dictation from a green group, Nor is any mention made of the overwheming warmist bias of the ABC. No, the only bias and alleged campaigning that concerns Finkelstein is that of sceptics.
Worse, he strongly suggests that this “bias” towards the sceptic’s side
of the argument is one that needs fixing by his government-backed News
Media Council.
Finkelstein raises the climate coverage of The Australian to illustrate this concern:
<blockquote>… in news reporting it is expected by the public, as
well as by professional journalists, that the coverage will be fair and
accurate. Nonetheless, there is a widely-held public view that, despite
industry-developed codes of practice that state this, the reporting of
news is not fair, accurate and balanced.
</blockquote>
And after discussing The Australian’s alleged sins - and other media failings such as breaches of privacy - Finkelstein concludes:
<blockquote>Across each of the areas which have been identified, it is relatively easy to identify failings in journalistic standards.
One proponent of the status quo of self-regulation suggested that
‘while it is trivially easy to demonstrate inaccuracies or biases or
ethical lapses in the press, the proper solution to such failures seems
to be working quite well’ . The last assertion will be subject of
detailed consideration later. It is sufficient at this juncture to make
the following points. The ease of identifications of failings comes from
the fact that they are not rare or infrequent. While some might be
trivial, many are not. Their persistent recurrence over the years indicates that existing measures to deal with the problem need improvement.
</blockquote>
This strongly suggests that Finkelstein believes his proposed News Media
Council could be used to stop or limit news organsations from
publishing reports casting doubt on global warming theory and useless
measures to “stop” global warming.
I cannot see how it can be read any other way. In this aspect alone, Finkelstein’s report is alarming. Even outrageous..
No wonder Australian Climate Madness is worried. After all, Finkelstein
proposes that his News Media Council regulate just such blogs as well,
and even ones far smaller, with just 40 hits a day.
How frightening that this kind of censorship - or, rather, “improvement” - potentially confronts us.
_____________________________
The warmists’ straw man: “We never said it wouldn’t rain”
Andrew Bolt – Monday, March 05, 12 (05:42 pm)
Is the gullible Anthony Sharwood saying Tim Flannery isn’t credible?
And why does he falsely claim that the criticism of alarmist scientist
is that they said it “would never rain again”? What a ludicrous and
deceptive exaggeration:
<blockquote>Dr Karl Braganza of the National Climate Centre… says
that any prediction whatsoever of higher or lower rainfall as a result
of climate change is complete bunkum.
That’ll come as a surprise to those who promoted the straw man argument
that the climate scientists all told us in the midst of the drought that
it would never rain again.
In fact, the reputable scientists never said anything of the sort. (Note to Sharwood: who ever claimed that they did? Quotes, please.)
“I have trawled everything we put out to see if someone from one of our
offices said anything like this, but no, we definitely never put out
statements that it would never rain again,” says Dr Karl.
“The scientists at the BoM (Bureau of Meteorology)and CSIRO made
continuous statements that the drought will end, and that [the dry spell
in the 2000s] wasn’t permanent...”
Here’s all of that in a nutshell. No one reputable ever said it wouldn’t rain again.
All they said is, it’s getting warmer and we don’t really know what
comes next. Maybe it’s more rain. Maybe it’s less. We’re still working
on that.
</blockquote>Sharwood huffs and puffs in indignation about an accusation that was
never made - that scientists claimed “it would never rain again”. This
is a red herring.
I suspect Sharwood knows that the real accusation is crucially
different: that some prominent warmists claimed global warming was
indeed bringing less rain, the drought could be permanent and our dams
could or would run out of water. What’s more, Braganza is wrong, and
some of those alarmists came from the Bureau of Meteorology.
A sample:
<blockquote>Greens leader Bob Brown in 2006:
<blockquote>From melting polar ice to the spectre of permanent drought in previously productive farmlands,the (World Meteorological Bureau’s) report makes clear that climate change is not just a future threat, it is damaging Australia now. </blockquote>Brown in 2008:
<blockquote>Already, (Rudd government adviser Ross Garnaut’s)
daunting data of a 10 per cent chance of no flow at all in the
Murray-Darling river system in future years is being overtaken by data
indicating that drought is the new norm across Australia’s greatest food bowl.
</blockquote> The Sydney Morning Herald in 2008:
<blockquote>This drought may never break
IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.
“Perhaps we should call it our new climate,” said the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate analysis, David Jones....
“There is a debate in the climate community, after … close to 12 years
of drought, whether this is something permanent. Certainly, in terms of temperature, that seems to be our reality, and that there is no turning back....”
</blockquote> Jones to the University of East Anglia in 2007:
<blockquote>Truth be know, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don’t need meteorological data to see it. Almost everyone of our cities is on the verge of running out of water and our largest irrigation system (the Murray Darling Basin is on the verge of collapse...
</blockquote>The Age in 2009:
<blockquote>A three-year collaboration between the Bureau of
Meteorology and CSIRO has confirmed what many scientists long suspected:
that the 13-year drought is not just a natural dry stretch but a shift
related to climate change…
‘’It’s reasonable to say that a lot of the current drought of the last
12 to 13 years is due to ongoing global warming,’’ said the bureau’s
Bertrand Timbal.
‘’In the minds of a lot of people, the rainfall we had in the 1950s,
1960s and 1970s was a benchmark. A lot of our [water and agriculture] planning was done during that time. But we are just not going to have that sort of good rain again as long as the system is warming up.’’...
</blockquote>Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery in 2007:
<blockquote> Flannery predicted cities such as Brisbane would
never again have dam-filling rains, as global warming had caused “a 20 per cent decrease in rainfall in some areas” and made the soil too hot, “so even the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and river systems … “.
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote>Warmist scientist David Karoly, 2003:
<blockquote>The Murray-Darling Basin… covers towns north to Toowoomba, west to
Broken Hill and south to Victoria and South Australia… Drought severity in the Murray Darling is increasing with global warming… This is the first drought in Australia where the impact of human-induced global warming can be clearly observed.
</blockquote>
Queensland Conservation Council:
<blockquote>Reduced rainfall due to Global warming will lead to decreased overall water availability… In part, the SEQ water crisis has been caused by climate change
</blockquote></blockquote>
Queensland Premier Peter Beattie, 2007:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>Given the current uncertainty about the likely impact of climate change on rainfall patterns in (South Eastern Queensland) over coming years, it is only prudent to assume at this stage that lower than usual rainfalls could eventuate.... </blockquote>
Flannery again:
<blockquote>Overthe past 50 years southern Australia has lost about 20 per cent of its rainfall, and one cause is almost certainly global
warming....Desalination plants can provide insurance against drought. In Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane, water supplies are so low they need desalinated water urgently, possibly in as little as 18 months.
</blockquote>
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, 2008:
<blockquote>
We know the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said by 2050 that Australia should expect around about a 25 per cent reduction in rainfall in the southern part of the Australia…
So there is a very, very sound body of evidence that indicates that
climate change is and will have an impact on rainfall in the
Murray-Darling Basin and in southern Australia.
</blockquote></blockquote>
UPDATE
Remember how 60 Minutes (and the CONspiracy Industry 'Stars' that still attack me,
for warning folk back then, to NOT fall for it), whipped up the “permanent drought” scare in 2005?
<blockquote>
CHARLES WOOLEY: While many farmers believe that drought is just part of a
natural cycle, scientist Dr Tim Flannery sees much broader and more
sinister forces at work. We live in a new world where global warming and
climate change now have Australia on the edge of permanent drought.
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: We are in by far the worst position of any country that I’ve had a look at in terms of climate change.
CHARLES WOOLEY: The worst of any country?
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: Yes. When you look right across the continent,
what has happened is that the winter rainfall zone that has been the
heart and soul of the bread basket of Australia is declining. The amount
of rainfall through winter is declining. On the east coast of Australia
we have a parallel effect where we are getting these El Ninos back to
back. We’re getting one drought after the other and eastern Australia is
suffering from that. So put together, you have the continent from Perth
through to Brisbane suffering severe water deficits.
CHARLES WOOLEY: If Tim Flannery is right, the new weather regime has southern Australia drying out permanently.
</blockquote>(Thanks to readers Ray and Mark.)
And that's only this week, lets forget the inconvenient truth of the last couple of years of
floods, that if we had have built dams and managed our annual monsoonal dumps, that
flow and flood from the north to the south in heavy years, we wouldn't have had any dry years, or such damaging floods from wild, uncontrolled flows.
It's not rocket science, it's simple hydrology that primitive desert cultures have used successfully for thousands of years.
But lets not kid ourselves, those Greenies are NOT idiots, and they do NOT want to 'save the planet', but DESTROY LIFE, and have been doing a BLOODY 'good' job of that for generations.
Bugger debate. There is no debate.
We've been drowning in real world evidence for years.
7 years and still they have no counter argument,
so hey, No argument, No debate, No expression of Independent opinion.
Simply make it illegal to disagree with BALD FACED LIES.
Finklestein’s media council: will sceptics be censored?
Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, March 06, 12 (12:07 am)
Australian Climate Madness warns the Finkelstein report could lead to warming sceptics being censored by the proposed new News Media Council. And it is right.
In detaling the alleged sins of the media, Finkelstein strays way
beyond his competence in assessing what’s bias in the climate debate,
and what is a legiitimate protest against overwhelming and deceitful
propaganda and an utterly useless and ruinous tax:
<blockquote>
4.33 One of the conclusions reached in the report (a particularly loaded one by by the far-Left Australian Centre for Independent Journalism) was this:
<blockquote>The two biggest News Ltd tabloids—the Herald
Sun and the Daily Telegraph—have been so biased in their coverage that
it is fair to say they ‘campaigned’ against the policy rather than
covered it. </blockquote></blockquote>
Finkelstein even cites sympathetically Robert Manne, a fervent alarmist
with zero qualifications in climate science and little apparent
knowledge of the issues in contention:
<blockquote>4.40 For instance, the Inquiry heard from Professor Robert Manne who,
earlier in 2011, had written an extensive critique of The Australian
newspaper in Quarterly Essay entitled ‘Bad News: Murdoch’s Australian
and the Shaping of the Nation’ that examined seven case studies of the
newspaper’s coverage of issues.
4.41 One of his case studies concerned coverage of climate change
policy and his findings mirrored those of the Australian Centre for
Independent Journalism. Professor Manne’s research found that articles
unfavourable to action on climate change outnumbered favourable articles
by a ratio of four to one.
4.42 In his response to Professor Manne’s work, Paul Kelly who is The
Australian’s editor-?at-?large, did not refute Manne’s statistics.
Instead, he argued that Manne’s position was based on a ‘rejection of
debate’ about the science of climate change:
<blockquote>One reason for the public’s backlash making carbon pricing
so unpopular was the precise attitude [Manne] took.
While pretending to be rational his rejection of debate was really faith-based dogmatism and the Australian public didn’t like being told what to think by patronising experts. </blockquote></blockquote>
Note that Finkelstein makes no comment at all about the far more overwhelming bias of, say, The Age, which reports the climate debate from a pro-warmist perspective so one-sided that even its own staff passed a statement of protest against their editor-in-chief,
after he virtually took dictation from a green group, Nor is any mention made of the overwheming warmist bias of the ABC. No, the only bias and alleged campaigning that concerns Finkelstein is that of sceptics.
Worse, he strongly suggests that this “bias” towards the sceptic’s side
of the argument is one that needs fixing by his government-backed News
Media Council.
Finkelstein raises the climate coverage of The Australian to illustrate this concern:
<blockquote>… in news reporting it is expected by the public, as
well as by professional journalists, that the coverage will be fair and
accurate. Nonetheless, there is a widely-held public view that, despite
industry-developed codes of practice that state this, the reporting of
news is not fair, accurate and balanced.
</blockquote>
And after discussing The Australian’s alleged sins - and other media failings such as breaches of privacy - Finkelstein concludes:
<blockquote>Across each of the areas which have been identified, it is relatively easy to identify failings in journalistic standards.
One proponent of the status quo of self-regulation suggested that
‘while it is trivially easy to demonstrate inaccuracies or biases or
ethical lapses in the press, the proper solution to such failures seems
to be working quite well’ . The last assertion will be subject of
detailed consideration later. It is sufficient at this juncture to make
the following points. The ease of identifications of failings comes from
the fact that they are not rare or infrequent. While some might be
trivial, many are not. Their persistent recurrence over the years indicates that existing measures to deal with the problem need improvement.
</blockquote>
This strongly suggests that Finkelstein believes his proposed News Media
Council could be used to stop or limit news organsations from
publishing reports casting doubt on global warming theory and useless
measures to “stop” global warming.
I cannot see how it can be read any other way. In this aspect alone, Finkelstein’s report is alarming. Even outrageous..
No wonder Australian Climate Madness is worried. After all, Finkelstein
proposes that his News Media Council regulate just such blogs as well,
and even ones far smaller, with just 40 hits a day.
How frightening that this kind of censorship - or, rather, “improvement” - potentially confronts us.
_____________________________
The warmists’ straw man: “We never said it wouldn’t rain”
Andrew Bolt – Monday, March 05, 12 (05:42 pm)
Is the gullible Anthony Sharwood saying Tim Flannery isn’t credible?
And why does he falsely claim that the criticism of alarmist scientist
is that they said it “would never rain again”? What a ludicrous and
deceptive exaggeration:
<blockquote>Dr Karl Braganza of the National Climate Centre… says
that any prediction whatsoever of higher or lower rainfall as a result
of climate change is complete bunkum.
That’ll come as a surprise to those who promoted the straw man argument
that the climate scientists all told us in the midst of the drought that
it would never rain again.
In fact, the reputable scientists never said anything of the sort. (Note to Sharwood: who ever claimed that they did? Quotes, please.)
“I have trawled everything we put out to see if someone from one of our
offices said anything like this, but no, we definitely never put out
statements that it would never rain again,” says Dr Karl.
“The scientists at the BoM (Bureau of Meteorology)and CSIRO made
continuous statements that the drought will end, and that [the dry spell
in the 2000s] wasn’t permanent...”
Here’s all of that in a nutshell. No one reputable ever said it wouldn’t rain again.
All they said is, it’s getting warmer and we don’t really know what
comes next. Maybe it’s more rain. Maybe it’s less. We’re still working
on that.
</blockquote>Sharwood huffs and puffs in indignation about an accusation that was
never made - that scientists claimed “it would never rain again”. This
is a red herring.
I suspect Sharwood knows that the real accusation is crucially
different: that some prominent warmists claimed global warming was
indeed bringing less rain, the drought could be permanent and our dams
could or would run out of water. What’s more, Braganza is wrong, and
some of those alarmists came from the Bureau of Meteorology.
A sample:
<blockquote>Greens leader Bob Brown in 2006:
<blockquote>From melting polar ice to the spectre of permanent drought in previously productive farmlands,the (World Meteorological Bureau’s) report makes clear that climate change is not just a future threat, it is damaging Australia now. </blockquote>Brown in 2008:
<blockquote>Already, (Rudd government adviser Ross Garnaut’s)
daunting data of a 10 per cent chance of no flow at all in the
Murray-Darling river system in future years is being overtaken by data
indicating that drought is the new norm across Australia’s greatest food bowl.
</blockquote> The Sydney Morning Herald in 2008:
<blockquote>This drought may never break
IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.
“Perhaps we should call it our new climate,” said the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate analysis, David Jones....
“There is a debate in the climate community, after … close to 12 years
of drought, whether this is something permanent. Certainly, in terms of temperature, that seems to be our reality, and that there is no turning back....”
</blockquote> Jones to the University of East Anglia in 2007:
<blockquote>Truth be know, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don’t need meteorological data to see it. Almost everyone of our cities is on the verge of running out of water and our largest irrigation system (the Murray Darling Basin is on the verge of collapse...
</blockquote>The Age in 2009:
<blockquote>A three-year collaboration between the Bureau of
Meteorology and CSIRO has confirmed what many scientists long suspected:
that the 13-year drought is not just a natural dry stretch but a shift
related to climate change…
‘’It’s reasonable to say that a lot of the current drought of the last
12 to 13 years is due to ongoing global warming,’’ said the bureau’s
Bertrand Timbal.
‘’In the minds of a lot of people, the rainfall we had in the 1950s,
1960s and 1970s was a benchmark. A lot of our [water and agriculture] planning was done during that time. But we are just not going to have that sort of good rain again as long as the system is warming up.’’...
</blockquote>Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery in 2007:
<blockquote> Flannery predicted cities such as Brisbane would
never again have dam-filling rains, as global warming had caused “a 20 per cent decrease in rainfall in some areas” and made the soil too hot, “so even the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and river systems … “.
</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote>Warmist scientist David Karoly, 2003:
<blockquote>The Murray-Darling Basin… covers towns north to Toowoomba, west to
Broken Hill and south to Victoria and South Australia… Drought severity in the Murray Darling is increasing with global warming… This is the first drought in Australia where the impact of human-induced global warming can be clearly observed.
</blockquote>
Queensland Conservation Council:
<blockquote>Reduced rainfall due to Global warming will lead to decreased overall water availability… In part, the SEQ water crisis has been caused by climate change
</blockquote></blockquote>
Queensland Premier Peter Beattie, 2007:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>Given the current uncertainty about the likely impact of climate change on rainfall patterns in (South Eastern Queensland) over coming years, it is only prudent to assume at this stage that lower than usual rainfalls could eventuate.... </blockquote>
Flannery again:
<blockquote>Overthe past 50 years southern Australia has lost about 20 per cent of its rainfall, and one cause is almost certainly global
warming....Desalination plants can provide insurance against drought. In Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane, water supplies are so low they need desalinated water urgently, possibly in as little as 18 months.
</blockquote>
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, 2008:
<blockquote>
We know the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said by 2050 that Australia should expect around about a 25 per cent reduction in rainfall in the southern part of the Australia…
So there is a very, very sound body of evidence that indicates that
climate change is and will have an impact on rainfall in the
Murray-Darling Basin and in southern Australia.
</blockquote></blockquote>
UPDATE
Remember how 60 Minutes (and the CONspiracy Industry 'Stars' that still attack me,
for warning folk back then, to NOT fall for it), whipped up the “permanent drought” scare in 2005?
<blockquote>
CHARLES WOOLEY: While many farmers believe that drought is just part of a
natural cycle, scientist Dr Tim Flannery sees much broader and more
sinister forces at work. We live in a new world where global warming and
climate change now have Australia on the edge of permanent drought.
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: We are in by far the worst position of any country that I’ve had a look at in terms of climate change.
CHARLES WOOLEY: The worst of any country?
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: Yes. When you look right across the continent,
what has happened is that the winter rainfall zone that has been the
heart and soul of the bread basket of Australia is declining. The amount
of rainfall through winter is declining. On the east coast of Australia
we have a parallel effect where we are getting these El Ninos back to
back. We’re getting one drought after the other and eastern Australia is
suffering from that. So put together, you have the continent from Perth
through to Brisbane suffering severe water deficits.
CHARLES WOOLEY: If Tim Flannery is right, the new weather regime has southern Australia drying out permanently.
</blockquote>(Thanks to readers Ray and Mark.)
And that's only this week, lets forget the inconvenient truth of the last couple of years of
floods, that if we had have built dams and managed our annual monsoonal dumps, that
flow and flood from the north to the south in heavy years, we wouldn't have had any dry years, or such damaging floods from wild, uncontrolled flows.
It's not rocket science, it's simple hydrology that primitive desert cultures have used successfully for thousands of years.
But lets not kid ourselves, those Greenies are NOT idiots, and they do NOT want to 'save the planet', but DESTROY LIFE, and have been doing a BLOODY 'good' job of that for generations.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
daddlepoms Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:56 am
actually australi is egypt
& canada is the mid east
& canada is the mid east
daddlepoms- Posts : 651
Join date : 2010-06-26
Location : three's a crowd but four's allowed
My Satanic Paradise...
Billy Ruben Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:53 pm
K-Federino wrote:
I believe the mother should have the right to terminate/Abort their children until 30 years of age,gun-shot to the head is permissable.
And all our teachers in school and politicians in government should all be Gay-Greenie-Leftist,given dictatorial powers to invade the family unit, and promote views that educate the family unit to embrace the protocols of the gay-greenie left agenda.
It should be mandatory to watch Sesame Street every morning while eating breakfast.
Animal lovers should have the right,to bequeath their love and marry their animal partners,with all the entitlements of marriage,divorce and financial arrangements acknowledged.See Suzy,my Satanic Paradise even has something for you in it.
Oh,Yeah,a One World government,under my all seeing eye is to be instituted.
Billy Ruben- Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:04 pm
Oh please, someone, anyone who doesn't have an 'infected' IP
that bars them from leaving comments on serious blogs,
pretty, pretty please, share these, old ads, (that I warned were,
saying much more than 'selling insurance', way back when they
first appeared), among those insightful commentators; they,
and we all, need to laugh, in face of the HORRORS being inflicted
on us, by the SWAN/Gillard Dictatorship...
before 'their' TOTAL CENSORSHIP CZARS,
take TOTAL CONTROL:...as "YOU" DO, by preventing
all my attempts to embed Key Videos
...
Click on the links, they are worth it.
https://youtu.be/yZCrmWdDjvU
[youtube][/youtube]
https://youtu.be/XqdpgvHt2zg
[youtube][/youtube]
Is angry Swan just covering his backside?
Freedom is our best defence against abuse of power
Age masterclass: how not to report an inconvenient truth
P.S. regarding the CENSORSHIP/MINISTRY of 'Truth'
'our' Government IS SETTING UP,
someone asked, "Why Now?".
I still maintain, It's 'The God Thing'...
well, it's still the only science backed issue
that IS 'LOUDLY SILENCED' and VICIOUSLY ATTACKED,
from and by ALL SIDES...Political, Religious and Atheist.
that bars them from leaving comments on serious blogs,
pretty, pretty please, share these, old ads, (that I warned were,
saying much more than 'selling insurance', way back when they
first appeared), among those insightful commentators; they,
and we all, need to laugh, in face of the HORRORS being inflicted
on us, by the SWAN/Gillard Dictatorship...
before 'their' TOTAL CENSORSHIP CZARS,
take TOTAL CONTROL:...as "YOU" DO, by preventing
all my attempts to embed Key Videos
...Click on the links, they are worth it.
https://youtu.be/yZCrmWdDjvU
[youtube][/youtube]
https://youtu.be/XqdpgvHt2zg
[youtube][/youtube]
Is angry Swan just covering his backside?
Freedom is our best defence against abuse of power
Age masterclass: how not to report an inconvenient truth
P.S. regarding the CENSORSHIP/MINISTRY of 'Truth'
'our' Government IS SETTING UP,
someone asked, "Why Now?".
I still maintain, It's 'The God Thing'...
well, it's still the only science backed issue
that IS 'LOUDLY SILENCED' and VICIOUSLY ATTACKED,
from and by ALL SIDES...Political, Religious and Atheist.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
Billy Ruben Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:50 pm
true lilly wrote:Oh please, someone, anyone who doesn't have an 'infected' IP
that bars them from leaving comments on serious blogs,
pretty, pretty please, share these, old ads, (that I warned were,
saying much more than 'selling insurance', way back when they
first appeared), among those insightful commentators; they,
and we all, need to laugh, in face of the HORRORS being inflicted
on us, by the SWAN/Gillard Dictatorship...
before 'their' TOTAL CENSORSHIP CZARS,
take TOTAL CONTROL:...as "YOU" DO, by preventing
all my attempts to embed Key Videos
Click on the links, they are worth it.
https://youtu.be/yZCrmWdDjvU
[youtube][/youtube]
https://youtu.be/XqdpgvHt2zg
[youtube][/youtube]
Is angry Swan just covering his backside?
Freedom is our best defence against abuse of power
Age masterclass: how not to report an inconvenient truth
P.S. regarding the CENSORSHIP/MINISTRY of 'Truth'
'our' Government IS SETTING UP,
someone asked, "Why Now?".
I still maintain, It's 'The God Thing'...
well, it's still the only science backed issue
that IS 'LOUDLY SILENCED' and VICIOUSLY ATTACKED,
from and by ALL SIDES...Political, Religious and Atheist.
Infected ip?
lET ME TAKE A GUESS,YOU DECIDED,IN ALL YOUR WISDOM TO VENTURE OUT FROM THE SANTUARY THAT IS sODLIKE fORUM,and post your nuttiness on comments pages of mainstream media outlets and they...banned your IP address.
You see Suzy,it's not a GOD thing,but other people,the majority feel the way I do about you too.Don't blame God for being the outcast that strive to be.You make people hate God,how many times I've got to tell you.You're stuck here...forever.
Suzy Ryan,you viciously attack others then cry victim.You set your reputation for yourself,not other people.You are a dangerous,lying nutter...end of story...
Billy Ruben- Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
Billy Ruben Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:56 pm
true lilly wrote:Oh please, someone, anyone who doesn't have an 'infected' IP
that bars them from leaving comments on serious blogs,
pretty, pretty please, share these, old ads, (that I warned were...blah,blah,blah....
and the answer is NO!!!!!...I will not post these dire warnings.
Billy Ruben- Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:39 am
Got this email this morning and thought I would share with you all:-
The new element is Governmentium (Gv).
It has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons,
88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons,
giving it an atomic mass of 312.
These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons,
which are surrounded by vast quantities of lefton-like particles
called peons.
Since Governmentium has no electrons or protons, it is inert. However,
it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it
comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction
normally taking less than a second to take from four days to four years to complete.
Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2- 6 years. It does not decay
but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the
assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.
In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since
each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming
isodopes.
This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe
that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical
concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical
morass.
When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium,
an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium
since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons.
All of the money is consumed in the exchange,
and no other byproducts are produced.
Makes you wonder which party this refers too doesn’t it.
deejay (Reply)
Tue 06 Mar 12 (12:06pm)
From:
Greens try to muzzle media
Piers Akerman
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 at 05:29am
209 Comments
A British perspective on Finklestein QC proposals: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100141570/why-i-owe-aussie-qc-raymond-finkelstein-a-pint/#disqus_thread
812 Comments
DT (Reply)
Tue 06 Mar 12 (09:32am)
The new element is Governmentium (Gv).
It has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons,
88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons,
giving it an atomic mass of 312.
These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons,
which are surrounded by vast quantities of lefton-like particles
called peons.
Since Governmentium has no electrons or protons, it is inert. However,
it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it
comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction
normally taking less than a second to take from four days to four years to complete.
Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2- 6 years. It does not decay
but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the
assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.
In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since
each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming
isodopes.
This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe
that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical
concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical
morass.
When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium,
an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium
since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons.
All of the money is consumed in the exchange,
and no other byproducts are produced.
Makes you wonder which party this refers too doesn’t it.
deejay (Reply)
Tue 06 Mar 12 (12:06pm)
From:
Greens try to muzzle media
Piers Akerman
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 at 05:29am
209 Comments
A British perspective on Finklestein QC proposals: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100141570/why-i-owe-aussie-qc-raymond-finkelstein-a-pint/#disqus_thread
812 Comments
DT (Reply)
Tue 06 Mar 12 (09:32am)
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:12 am
true lilly wrote:Greens and their crazy cronies are holding a gun to our head
Piers Akerman – Thursday, March 08, 12 (07:09 pm)
THE Australian economy is under attack
from international forces allied
to Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s
minority government partner, the Greens.
Continue reading 'Greens and their crazy cronies are holding a gun to our head'
232 comments
Black Saturday fire was arson, jury hears
AAP
THE fatal Churchill Black Saturday
bushfire
was deliberately lit in two places
by Brendan James Sokaluk,
a prosecutor has told a jury.
165 Nathalia residents evacuate
Michelle Ainsworth
NATHALIA residents are evacuating the town
after the SES warned
more than 400 homes were at risk of flooding
if the levees breached.
57 comments on this story
Northeast: Victorian towns affected by floods
Pictures: Nathalia floods
Video: Families in Nathalia fight the floods
Pictures: Numurkah floods
So, is there a day that goes by,
without
what's real, in the real world,
that I warned to watch for,
coming to be, for all to see,
and proving-:
'Ciggy- Lime Lady - lemonpie - barnical bill - Sorcha Faal -
Wonder Woman -Billy Ruben -cori - ioioio - ozpixie -
ownoiz - merlin cove - i_am - el kabong - Cug - cheeb -
nobodyswife - yass - edelweiss pirate - tintin - David Icke
et-bloody-lying-cetera on line trolling names that attack';
to be bloody lying beastly fools...NO.
And I barely even click on,
the best of the best of it,
or,
worst of the worst of it,
let alone speak or post it...
$5 billion water bill bleeds us dry
by:Stephen Drill
From:Herald Sun
March 10, 2012
12:00AM
102 comments
The desalination plant at Wonthaggi and (inset) floods near Nathalia this week. Herald Sun
VICTORIA would need to be in drought for eight years
before a drop of water was required
from the Wonthaggi desalination plant, scientists say.
But taxpayers will pay more than $5 billion in that time to have access to the water.
As floods swamp the northeast, critics have questioned why the plant was built.
Prof Hector Malano, a water resource management expert at the
University of Melbourne, said Melbourne's current water storages
would last until 2020 even if there were a drought.
"It would be up to eight years depending on the climate and population growth," he said.
"Desalination is the last option
that you want to use.
But once the decision is made
to begin building the plant,
we will be paying for it for some time."
The desalination plant will cost taxpayers $24 billion over 30 years.
Victorians will pay
desalination plant project company AquaSure
$1.8 million a day for access to water at the plant,
even if none is used; $5.2 billion by 2020.
Water storages are 64.7 per cent full after hitting a record low of 25.6 per cent in June 2009.
In further potential pain to taxpayers,
AquaSure has demanded a $1.3 billion loan
to refinance its debt and
a 12-month deadline extension
from the State Government.
It also claimed a $560 million payment this year
even though it doubted the plant would be finished.
Mark Robertson, president of anti-desalination campaigners Watershed,
said the plant should never have been built.
"We survived during the drought with water restrictions and
that didn't cost anything or have the environmental effects," he said.
Water Minister Peter Walsh said
the Labor government had panicked
during the drought
when it ordered the plant.
"The previous government should have acted before the drought occurred
by looking at stormwater and recycled water for non-drinking purposes,"
he said.
Mr Walsh said he would vigorously defend AquaSure's financial claims,
adding he would not sign anything that was not value for money for taxpayers.
An AquaSure spokeswoman said:
"Like any other major project contract,
there are provisions in our contract
with the state for AquaSure to lodge claims
in certain circumstances."
drills@heraldsun.com.au
102 comments on this story
And, it only took about 70-30 years of 'Hollywood',
'A Country Practice', 'Sesame Street', 'Hippy',
'god is dead/only man can save the world' PREACHING,
FASCIST Brainwashing PROPAGANDA,
to WHIP UP THE PANIC 'they' COULD SELL.
David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > General >
Sorcha Faal reports
limelady wrote:11-05-2007, 04:12 PM
April 29, 2007
Australia Begins Secret Talks On Evacuating Half Of Continent Due To Epic Drought
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Shocking reports from the Kremlin today are showing that just under one
week from Australian Prime Minister Howard’s urgent plea to his citizens
to pray for rain to fall on their drought ravaged Nation, the
Government of Australia
has entered into secret negotiations with the United States and their
Commonwealth allies for the ‘proposed’ evacuation of upwards of 11
million of its 20 million citizens.
Please read the rest here (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1006.htm)
What do you dudes and dudettes make of this?
How global warming is preached in Year 8
193 Comments
...get The Picture...not, The Big Picture...
The Biggest...
https://sodlikeproductions.forumotion.com/t1123p15-david-icke-site-betrays-australia-3
...get The Picture...not, The Big Picture...
The Biggest...
Greens and their crazy cronies are holding a gun to our headtrue lilly wrote:Ciggy the FINKlestein...
See what and whom, I've been up against all these years.
Bugger debate. There is no debate.
We've been drowning in real world evidence for years.
7 years and still they have no counter argument,
so hey, No argument, No debate, No expression of Independent opinion.
Simply make it illegal to disagree with BALD FACED LIES.
Oh, there are more links to quotes in these articles at the Title/Links
that I just can't keep trying to edit back in, while also trying to edit back to legible.
Finklestein’s media council: will sceptics be censored?
Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, March 06, 12 (12:07 am)
Australian
Climate Madness warns the Finkelstein report could lead to warming
sceptics being censored by the proposed new News Media Council. And it
is right.
In detaling the alleged sins of the media, Finkelstein strays way
beyond his competence in assessing what’s bias in the climate debate,
and what is a legiitimate protest against overwhelming and deceitful
propaganda and an utterly useless and ruinous tax:
4.33
One of the conclusions reached in the report (a particularly loaded
one by by the far-Left Australian Centre for Independent Journalism)
was this:
The two biggest News Ltd tabloids—the Herald
Sun and the Daily Telegraph—have been so biased in their coverage that
it is fair to say they ‘campaigned’ against the policy rather than
covered it.
Finkelstein even cites sympathetically Robert Manne, a fervent alarmist
with zero qualifications in climate science and little apparent
knowledge of the issues in contention:
4.40 For instance, the Inquiry heard from Professor Robert Manne who,
earlier in 2011, had written an extensive critique of The Australian
newspaper in Quarterly Essay entitled ‘Bad News: Murdoch’s Australian
and the Shaping of the Nation’ that examined seven case studies of the
newspaper’s coverage of issues.
4.41 One of his case studies concerned coverage of climate change
policy and his findings mirrored those of the Australian Centre for
Independent Journalism. Professor Manne’s research found that articles
unfavourable to action on climate change outnumbered favourable articles
by a ratio of four to one.
4.42 In his response to Professor Manne’s work, Paul Kelly who is The
Australian’s editor-?at-?large, did not refute Manne’s statistics.
Instead, he argued that Manne’s position was based on a ‘rejection of
debate’ about the science of climate change:
One reason for the public’s backlash making carbon pricing
so unpopular was the precise attitude [Manne] took.
While pretending to be rational his rejection of debate was really
faith-based dogmatism and the Australian public didn’t like being told
what to think by patronising experts.
Note that Finkelstein makes no comment at all about the far more overwhelming bias of, say, The Age,
which reports the climate debate from a pro-warmist perspective so
one-sided that even its own staff passed a statement of protest
against their editor-in-chief,
after he virtually took dictation from a green group, Nor is any
mention made of the overwheming warmist bias of the ABC. No, the only
bias and alleged campaigning that concerns Finkelstein is that of
sceptics.
Worse, he strongly suggests that this “bias” towards the sceptic’s side
of the argument is one that needs fixing by his government-backed News
Media Council.
Finkelstein raises the climate coverage of The Australian to illustrate this concern:
… in news reporting it is expected by the public, as
well as by professional journalists, that the coverage will be fair and
accurate. Nonetheless, there is a widely-held public view that, despite
industry-developed codes of practice that state this, the reporting of
news is not fair, accurate and balanced.
And after discussing The Australian’s alleged sins - and other media failings such as breaches of privacy - Finkelstein concludes:
Across each of the areas which have been identified, it is relatively easy to identify failings in journalistic standards.
One proponent of the status quo of self-regulation suggested that
‘while it is trivially easy to demonstrate inaccuracies or biases or
ethical lapses in the press, the proper solution to such failures seems
to be working quite well’ . The last assertion will be subject of
detailed consideration later. It is sufficient at this juncture to make
the following points. The ease of identifications of failings comes from
the fact that they are not rare or infrequent. While some might be
trivial, many are not. Their persistent recurrence over the years indicates that existing measures to deal with the problem need improvement.
This strongly suggests that Finkelstein believes his proposed News Media
Council could be used to stop or limit news organsations from
publishing reports casting doubt on global warming theory and useless
measures to “stop” global warming.
I cannot see how it can be read any other way. In this aspect alone, Finkelstein’s report is alarming. Even outrageous..
No wonder Australian Climate Madness is worried. After all, Finkelstein
proposes that his News Media Council regulate just such blogs as well,
and even ones far smaller, with just 40 hits a day.
How frightening that this kind of censorship - or, rather, “improvement” - potentially confronts us.
_____________________________
The warmists’ straw man: “We never said it wouldn’t rain”
Andrew Bolt – Monday, March 05, 12 (05:42 pm)
Is the gullible Anthony Sharwood saying Tim Flannery isn’t credible?
And why does he falsely claim that the criticism of alarmist scientist
is that they said it “would never rain again”? What a ludicrous and
deceptive exaggeration:
Dr Karl Braganza of the National Climate Centre… says
that any prediction whatsoever of higher or lower rainfall as a result
of climate change is complete bunkum.
That’ll come as a surprise to those who promoted the straw man argument
that the climate scientists all told us in the midst of the drought that
it would never rain again.
In fact, the reputable scientists never said anything of the sort. (Note to Sharwood: who ever claimed that they did? Quotes, please.)
“I have trawled everything we put out to see if someone from one of our
offices said anything like this, but no, we definitely never put out
statements that it would never rain again,” says Dr Karl.
“The scientists at the BoM (Bureau of Meteorology)and CSIRO made
continuous statements that the drought will end, and that [the dry spell
in the 2000s] wasn’t permanent...”
Here’s all of that in a nutshell. No one reputable ever said it wouldn’t rain again.
All they said is, it’s getting warmer and we don’t really know what
comes next. Maybe it’s more rain. Maybe it’s less. We’re still working
on that.
Sharwood huffs and puffs in indignation about an accusation that was
never made - that scientists claimed “it would never rain again”. This
is a red herring.
I suspect Sharwood knows that the real accusation is crucially
different: that some prominent warmists claimed global warming was
indeed bringing less rain, the drought could be permanent and our dams
could or would run out of water. What’s more, Braganza is wrong, and
some of those alarmists came from the Bureau of Meteorology.
A sample:
Greens leader Bob Brown in 2006:
<blockquote>From melting polar ice to the spectre of permanent drought in previously productive farmlands,the
(World Meteorological Bureau’s) report makes clear that climate change
is not just a future threat, it is damaging Australia now. </blockquote>Brown in 2008:
Already, (Rudd government adviser Ross Garnaut’s)
daunting data of a 10 per cent chance of no flow at all in the
Murray-Darling river system in future years is being overtaken by data
indicating that drought is the new norm across Australia’s greatest food bowl.
The Sydney Morning Herald in 2008:
This drought may never break
IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by
drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the
nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.
“Perhaps we should call it our new climate,” said the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate analysis, David Jones....
“There is a debate in the climate community, after … close to 12 years
of drought, whether this is something permanent. Certainly, in terms of
temperature, that seems to be our reality, and that there is no turning
back....”
Jones to the University of East Anglia in 2007:
Truth
be know, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don’t
need meteorological data to see it. Almost everyone of our cities is on
the verge of running out of water and our largest irrigation system (the
Murray Darling Basin is on the verge of collapse...
The Age in 2009:
A three-year collaboration between the Bureau of
Meteorology and CSIRO has confirmed what many scientists long suspected:
that the 13-year drought is not just a natural dry stretch but a shift
related to climate change…
‘’It’s reasonable to say that a lot of the current drought of the last
12 to 13 years is due to ongoing global warming,’’ said the bureau’s
Bertrand Timbal.
‘’In the minds of a lot of people, the rainfall we had in the 1950s,
1960s
and 1970s was a benchmark. A lot of our [water and agriculture]
planning was done during that time. But we are just not going to have
that sort of good rain again as long as the system is warming
up.’’...[/i]
Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery in 2007:
Flannery predicted cities such as Brisbane would
never again have dam-filling rains, as global warming had caused “a 20 per
cent
decrease in rainfall in some areas” and made the soil too hot, “so even
the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and river
systems … “.
Warmist scientist David Karoly, 2003:
The Murray-Darling Basin… covers towns north to Toowoomba, west to
Broken
Hill and south to Victoria and South Australia… Drought severity in the
Murray Darling is increasing with global warming… This is the first
drought in Australia where the impact of human-induced global warming
can be clearly observed.
Queensland Conservation Council:
Reduced
rainfall due to Global warming will lead to decreased overall water
availability… In part, the SEQ water crisis has been caused by climate
change
Queensland Premier Peter Beattie, 2007:
Given the current uncertainty about the likely impact of climate change on
rainfall patterns in (South Eastern Queensland) over coming years, it
is only prudent to assume at this stage that lower than usual rainfalls
could eventuate....
Flannery again:
Overthe past 50 years southern Australia has lost about 20 per cent of its rainfall, and one cause is almost certainly global
warming....Desalination plants can provide insurance against drought. In Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane, water supplies are so low they need desalinated water urgently, possibly in as little as 18 months.
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, 2008:
We
know the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said by
2050 that Australia should expect around about a 25 per cent reduction
in rainfall in the southern part of the Australia…
So there is a very, very sound body of evidence that indicates that
climate change is and will have an impact on rainfall in the
Murray-Darling Basin and in southern Australia.
UPDATE
Remember how 60 Minutes (and the CONspiracy Industry 'Stars' that still attack me,
for warning folk back then, to NOT fall for it), whipped up the “permanent drought” scare in 2005?
CHARLES WOOLEY: While many farmers believe that drought is just part of a
natural cycle, scientist Dr Tim Flannery sees much broader and more
sinister forces at work. We live in a new world where global warming and
climate change now have Australia on the edge of permanent drought.
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: We are in by far the worst position of any country that I’ve had a look at in terms of climate change.
CHARLES WOOLEY: The worst of any country?
PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: Yes. When you look right across the continent,
what has happened is that the winter rainfall zone that has been the
heart and soul of the bread basket of Australia is declining. The amount
of rainfall through winter is declining. On the east coast of Australia
we have a parallel effect where we are getting these El Ninos back to
back. We’re getting one drought after the other and eastern Australia is
suffering from that. So put together, you have the continent from Perth
through to Brisbane suffering severe water deficits.
CHARLES WOOLEY: If Tim Flannery is right, the new weather regime has southern Australia drying out permanently.
(Thanks to readers Ray and Mark.)
And that's only this week, lets forget the inconvenient truth of the last couple of years of
floods, that if we had have built dams and managed our annual monsoonal dumps, that
flow
and flood from the north to the south in heavy years, we wouldn't have
had any dry years, or such damaging floods from wild, uncontrolled
flows.
It's not rocket science, it's simple hydrology that primitive desert cultures have used successfully for thousands of years.
But lets not kid ourselves, those Greenies are NOT idiots, and they do NOT want to 'save the planet', but DESTROY LIFE, and have been doing a BLOODY 'good' job of that for generations.
Piers Akerman – Thursday, March 08, 12 (07:09 pm)
THE Australian economy is under attack
from international forces allied
to Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s
minority government partner, the Greens.
Continue reading 'Greens and their crazy cronies are holding a gun to our head'
232 comments
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 10, 2012 7:16 am
Labor only has one policy - target Tony
Piers Akerman – Saturday, March 10, 12 (10:21 pm)
THE Gillard-Labor-Green-independent minority government has no successful
programs, policies or record of success, so it is attacking Tony Abbott.
With not one issue they wish to identify with, the government, from
Julia Gillard down, is reading from a single script - get Abbott. What
an extraordinary admission of total failure.
The Labor Party is still operating as if it were in opposition.
With its media allies in the ABC and Fairfax, the ALP never stops
sniggering about his appearance in his life-saver uniform
budgie-smugglers, or attempting to promote malicious rumours about his staff.
Even now there are Labor supporters trawling through Abbott’s career as a
journalist with long-extinct Bulletin magazine in an attempt to sully his reputation.
As we saw during the vicious campaign to denigrate Kevin Rudd, there are
no depths too low for Labor. Even the newly minted senator Bob Carr is
on-message, telling allies on Tuesday: “If we make Abbott the issue, we
will win. Our strategy at the next election needs to be a referendum on
Abbott. If we drive that message home, we will win.”
Militant incoming ACTU boss Dave Oliver is promising a campaign to demonise Abbott.
There was a time when governments were expected to deliver for the nation, not carry-on like vuvuzela-blowing sports fans.
But the monotonous drone has deafened many voters to the government’s silence on big issues.
This paucity of policy was highlighted when the Prime Minister flew over
the flooded plains of NSW this week and was asked a question about the
need to build dams.
Unable to come up with a constructive reply, Gillard replied: “Oh look, I
think you’ll find that the question about dams and flood mitigation is
not a simple one.
“So let’s not, whilst people are still working, you know, volunteering,
while people are still thinking what’s happened to their home, pretend
that there’s an easy solution here. That’s not the right thing to do."
Oh, really, if it’s not the right time to outline policy on water, when is?
The dam question Gillard ducked really related to the need to have a
sensible policy on harvesting water, not letting it run into the ocean.
That says a lot about her sensitivity to the Green ideologues who
successfully manipulated Carr when he was NSW premier and blocked the
building of a much-needed new dam south of Sydney.
As for sloganeering politicians, there is probably no greater abuser of
the political slogans and cliches than Gillard, who still flogs “moving
forward”, “the right thing to do” and “working families” (as opposed to what?).
If Gillard was genuine she would have denounced Fair Work Australia for
its refusal to assist police inquiries on allegations of misuse of union
funds by Craig Thomson, the NSW Labor MP who is subject to the
longest-running investigation of an individual in the nation’s history
(which he denies).
But she and her Minister for Workplace Relations, Bill Shorten, cannot bring themselves to criticise Fair Work Australia.
The hypocrisy of a government so critical of everything the opposition
proposes, accepting without question the refusal of a government
instrumentality to assist law enforcement authorities is staggering.
But contradictions are the norm for this government, with Treasurer
Wayne Swan claiming to support growth in the Australian economy while
singling out the mining sector, the only area of the economy which is
expanding, for criticism.
It makes as much sense as Climate Minister Greg Combet’s insistence that
the government will maintain its starting price of $23-a-tonne for
carbon dioxide in July when there is no support for such a price on the
world market. That stupidity is matched only by the government’s plan to
provide a fixed level of compensation for this economy-destroying tax
when it subsequently floats the carbon dioxide price.
How can that possibly work? Even the most economically illiterate will
understand that it is impossible to “fix” a level of compensation for a
“floating” penalty.
Never has a sitting prime minister, even an appointed one like Gillard,
lied so clearly about a policy during an election campaign as she did on
this tax issue. Never has a prime minister been so publicly referred to
as a liar and never has the description been so deserved and so
accepted.
The lies, of course, continue with the anti-Abbott campaign.
Even now, as Abbott promises - among other policies - to establish an
audit commission, repeal the carbon dioxide tax and restore border
security, Labor insists he has no policies.
Abbott is not the issue, he is the Opposition leader.
The government is the issue and it is a failure.
15 comments
Labor Party members and their supporters are first political team players,
everything they do puts the Labor Party first.
It is all about keeping Labor in front of the Liberal National Coalition at any cost
to constituents.
They proclaim their faults by insisting on using
the MP for Dobell, Craig Thomson, as their little drummer boy.
Insisting on keeping him standing their year after year
defiantly tapping on his drum, while every attempt to bring him down is blocked
by faceless men and women in positions of power and influence.
Every shot intended to bring him and Federal Labor government to their knees
fails to hit the small yet important target.
This party member is part of a much more important battle,
where we the peoples must resolve to do at the ballot box what,
The Labor Party refuses to do for itself.
We must uproot the political weeds growing within our garden bed of democracy.
Labor MP for Dobell Craig Thomson symbolizes in the political court of public
opinion much of what has gone wrong with Labor nationally.
We know Labor has been consuming itself from within, we watched while they reached
greedily for something useful in the person of Bob Carr from outside the federal sphere. Their actions a signpost pointing to their own political consumption.
The fall in membership means their politics
has withered and bears no good fruit for the grass roots people who nurtured
Labor over a hundred years, Labors roots are rotten. It is way past time to
plough the political weeds into the ground and start again.
Edward James
Edward James (Reply)
Sat 10 Mar 12 (11:25pm)
Piers Akerman – Saturday, March 10, 12 (10:21 pm)
THE Gillard-Labor-Green-independent minority government has no successful
programs, policies or record of success, so it is attacking Tony Abbott.
With not one issue they wish to identify with, the government, from
Julia Gillard down, is reading from a single script - get Abbott. What
an extraordinary admission of total failure.
The Labor Party is still operating as if it were in opposition.
With its media allies in the ABC and Fairfax, the ALP never stops
sniggering about his appearance in his life-saver uniform
budgie-smugglers, or attempting to promote malicious rumours about his staff.
Even now there are Labor supporters trawling through Abbott’s career as a
journalist with long-extinct Bulletin magazine in an attempt to sully his reputation.
As we saw during the vicious campaign to denigrate Kevin Rudd, there are
no depths too low for Labor. Even the newly minted senator Bob Carr is
on-message, telling allies on Tuesday: “If we make Abbott the issue, we
will win. Our strategy at the next election needs to be a referendum on
Abbott. If we drive that message home, we will win.”
Militant incoming ACTU boss Dave Oliver is promising a campaign to demonise Abbott.
There was a time when governments were expected to deliver for the nation, not carry-on like vuvuzela-blowing sports fans.
But the monotonous drone has deafened many voters to the government’s silence on big issues.
This paucity of policy was highlighted when the Prime Minister flew over
the flooded plains of NSW this week and was asked a question about the
need to build dams.
Unable to come up with a constructive reply, Gillard replied: “Oh look, I
think you’ll find that the question about dams and flood mitigation is
not a simple one.
“So let’s not, whilst people are still working, you know, volunteering,
while people are still thinking what’s happened to their home, pretend
that there’s an easy solution here. That’s not the right thing to do."
Oh, really, if it’s not the right time to outline policy on water, when is?
The dam question Gillard ducked really related to the need to have a
sensible policy on harvesting water, not letting it run into the ocean.
That says a lot about her sensitivity to the Green ideologues who
successfully manipulated Carr when he was NSW premier and blocked the
building of a much-needed new dam south of Sydney.
As for sloganeering politicians, there is probably no greater abuser of
the political slogans and cliches than Gillard, who still flogs “moving
forward”, “the right thing to do” and “working families” (as opposed to what?).
If Gillard was genuine she would have denounced Fair Work Australia for
its refusal to assist police inquiries on allegations of misuse of union
funds by Craig Thomson, the NSW Labor MP who is subject to the
longest-running investigation of an individual in the nation’s history
(which he denies).
But she and her Minister for Workplace Relations, Bill Shorten, cannot bring themselves to criticise Fair Work Australia.
The hypocrisy of a government so critical of everything the opposition
proposes, accepting without question the refusal of a government
instrumentality to assist law enforcement authorities is staggering.
But contradictions are the norm for this government, with Treasurer
Wayne Swan claiming to support growth in the Australian economy while
singling out the mining sector, the only area of the economy which is
expanding, for criticism.
It makes as much sense as Climate Minister Greg Combet’s insistence that
the government will maintain its starting price of $23-a-tonne for
carbon dioxide in July when there is no support for such a price on the
world market. That stupidity is matched only by the government’s plan to
provide a fixed level of compensation for this economy-destroying tax
when it subsequently floats the carbon dioxide price.
How can that possibly work? Even the most economically illiterate will
understand that it is impossible to “fix” a level of compensation for a
“floating” penalty.
Never has a sitting prime minister, even an appointed one like Gillard,
lied so clearly about a policy during an election campaign as she did on
this tax issue. Never has a prime minister been so publicly referred to
as a liar and never has the description been so deserved and so
accepted.
The lies, of course, continue with the anti-Abbott campaign.
Even now, as Abbott promises - among other policies - to establish an
audit commission, repeal the carbon dioxide tax and restore border
security, Labor insists he has no policies.
Abbott is not the issue, he is the Opposition leader.
The government is the issue and it is a failure.
15 comments
Labor Party members and their supporters are first political team players,
everything they do puts the Labor Party first.
It is all about keeping Labor in front of the Liberal National Coalition at any cost
to constituents.
They proclaim their faults by insisting on using
the MP for Dobell, Craig Thomson, as their little drummer boy.
Insisting on keeping him standing their year after year
defiantly tapping on his drum, while every attempt to bring him down is blocked
by faceless men and women in positions of power and influence.
Every shot intended to bring him and Federal Labor government to their knees
fails to hit the small yet important target.
This party member is part of a much more important battle,
where we the peoples must resolve to do at the ballot box what,
The Labor Party refuses to do for itself.
We must uproot the political weeds growing within our garden bed of democracy.
Labor MP for Dobell Craig Thomson symbolizes in the political court of public
opinion much of what has gone wrong with Labor nationally.
We know Labor has been consuming itself from within, we watched while they reached
greedily for something useful in the person of Bob Carr from outside the federal sphere. Their actions a signpost pointing to their own political consumption.
The fall in membership means their politics
has withered and bears no good fruit for the grass roots people who nurtured
Labor over a hundred years, Labors roots are rotten. It is way past time to
plough the political weeds into the ground and start again.
Edward James
Edward James (Reply)
Sat 10 Mar 12 (11:25pm)
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:14 pm
Why does Thomson seem a protected species?
It's not Craig Thompson, but his very close, blood relation,
and her very large, extended, scattered among Left, Right, Centre,
Red, Blue, Green, Plain, Checkered and All Stripes, but yet,
'strangle hold' tight, family.
She's known as Ms. Box; Pandora.
Breaking News: 'Protected Species' Title Lifted.
The lid has been lifted on the family of Ms. Pandora Box.
Having reached Globally Threatening Plague proportions,
culls have already begun.
All members who fail to divorce themselves
from the family of Ms. Pandora Box,
by a yet to be disclosed date,
will be classed as 'Non-persons' and
given 'After Birth Abortions'.
It was revealed that plague numbers went unnoticed for
so long, due to the Shredding, withholding, burying and
deliberate altering of records, by family members of the,
once powerful Ms. Pandora Box, deliberately placed in
'respected' positions, such as medicine, the judiciary,
policing, education and every other 'public service' roll.
It's not Craig Thompson, but his very close, blood relation,
and her very large, extended, scattered among Left, Right, Centre,
Red, Blue, Green, Plain, Checkered and All Stripes, but yet,
'strangle hold' tight, family.
She's known as Ms. Box; Pandora.
Breaking News: 'Protected Species' Title Lifted.
The lid has been lifted on the family of Ms. Pandora Box.
Having reached Globally Threatening Plague proportions,
culls have already begun.
All members who fail to divorce themselves
from the family of Ms. Pandora Box,
by a yet to be disclosed date,
will be classed as 'Non-persons' and
given 'After Birth Abortions'.
It was revealed that plague numbers went unnoticed for
so long, due to the Shredding, withholding, burying and
deliberate altering of records, by family members of the,
once powerful Ms. Pandora Box, deliberately placed in
'respected' positions, such as medicine, the judiciary,
policing, education and every other 'public service' roll.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:02 pm
The Bolt Report today
Andrew Bolt – Sunday, March 11, 12 (01:20 pm)
(videos at above Title/Link)
On Defence Minister Stephen Smith’s
continuing campaign against one of his officers.
On the new Julia - and the old Smith.
With Michael Kroger and Bruce Hawker.
On Peter Slipper’s expenses and the flying phone;
Wayne Swan’s softening up for a tax;
and the scaremongers who went to work
a year ago at Fukushima.
Andrew Bolt – Sunday, March 11, 12 (01:20 pm)
(videos at above Title/Link)
On Defence Minister Stephen Smith’s
continuing campaign against one of his officers.
On the new Julia - and the old Smith.
With Michael Kroger and Bruce Hawker.
On Peter Slipper’s expenses and the flying phone;
Wayne Swan’s softening up for a tax;
and the scaremongers who went to work
a year ago at Fukushima.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:28 pm
Catallaxy Files
Media bias – does it affect voting patterns?
12 comments
I take it as such an obvious fact of life that one of the problems
we on our side of the fence have to deal with, and it is a very
long-standing problem, is the media bias that makes it very difficult to
put our perspective into the public domain without having to go through
the distorting lens of the mainstream media. In a posting
in which I noted that his wins in the lastest rounds of primaries were
being given no serious media coverage and certainly very little positive
coverage, something noticed by many others and not just me, I stated in
an off-handed sort of way that “the narrative, as in all instances, is
in the hands of the American media whose aim is to demoralise the
Republican side as much as possible.” But this then led to a comment by
one of my fellow contributors here at Catallaxy. Samuel J wrote in reply:
<blockquote><blockquote>What’s going on is that the narrative, as in all instances,
is in the hands of the American media whose aim is to
demoralise the Republican side as much as possible.</blockquote>
This type of argument is used by those who think the media should be
regulated and overseen by some independent council for fairness. I don’t
agree with the argument – if Romney doesn’t win the election it will be
because people didn’t vote for him, not because of the media.
</blockquote>
To be frank, I found this something of a surprise. I would think that
to have watched politics at all, certainly everywhere in the English
speaking world, there would be no question that to try to inject a
right-of-centre perspective is seriously difficult. And again, I am
hardly the only one to have made this point. So to clarify matters, I
wrote this response:
<blockquote>You know, Samuel J, we are obviously living in a parallel universe. What kind of statement is this?
<blockquote>If Romney doesn’t win the election it will be because people didn’t vote for him, not because of the media.
</blockquote>
Do you not see any possible cause and effect relationship between who
people vote for and the media that surrounds them? You should have a
look at the extraordinarily interesting book on media bias, Left Turn,
which I reviewed in Quadrant. This is from that review:
<blockquote>Using some very sophisticated econometric techniques, he
estimates that were the media’s bias around 50 instead, the PQ of the
country would move from around 50 to around half that number to
something like 20-25. That is, the population of the United States would
then have views on average far more conservative than the biases
exhibited in the present day by Fox News!
</blockquote>
That is as near a fact as I can conjure about what ought to be the
most obvious problem for anyone running on the right side of the
political fence. It is not, and amongst us has never been, a call to
regulate the media. But if this is invisible to you, whatever remains
visible must often seem difficult to understand.
</blockquote>
I would have left it there except that Samuel J responded in turn.
In his response Samuel J wrote:
<blockquote>Steve – yes, I’m denying that the media can influence public opinion
[my emphasis - SK]. How much, no one really knows. Is it the most
important factor in a number of potential and actual influences on
public opinion – again, unknown.
But let’s say that the media is the principal influence on voting.
And let’s say that democracy demands that voters have accurate
information presented to them to make an informed decision –
otherwise false or biased commentary in the newspapers
will result in voters casting votes different to what they would
if they had unbiased commentary.
Then you are led inexorably into the need to have an overseeing body to bring balance, fairness and accuracy to the media.
Me, I’d prefer (correctly or not) to work on the presumption that
voters are intelligent enough and to sort the wheat from the chaff. That
voters are influenced by a whole host of factors, and that among these
are their peers, friends, personal prejudices etc.
Yes, the media has biased elements – maybe it is dominated by biased
elements. Yes, I often get annoyed about the bias – which I think is
principally left-wing, although there are elements of extremism on the
other side.
And, yes, I think it would be nice if the media had a clear
distinction between news and comment – the former should consist
entirely of facts and be sourced. The latter can have speculation and
biases.
</blockquote>
So his point, as I understand it, is that if we came to the
conclusion that the media have a left wing bias, then we would be forced
to enact some kind of legislation to prevent it, to rectify matters, to
straighten it out. Therefore, it seems, the best way to forestall
having to start regulating the media is to deny that it is biased at all.
Media bias to the left is shown in more studies than the one I quoted in Quadrant.
And there are compensating advantages to the right side since
politicians on the right know they are being watched like hawks so they
tend to be more careful, while those on the left tend to be slipshod
because they are called out less often. Overall, however, this bias
costs votes and support for those on the right. People are less well
informed and it is more difficult to get a message out. The natural
reflexes of the media is somewhere between Fabian and Marxist, with an
almost no-enemies-to-the-left approach. Public debate is stifled and
there is a general drift to the left in policy which is brought to an
end usually only because of the fantastic damage such policies do.
Mitt Romney is now ahead of Barack Obama in the polls 48%-43% only
because the evidence of the harm Obama has done has become so
overwhelming that even with all of the protections offered by the media,
the population in general has begun to understand for themselves that
things must change. But this will still likely be a very close election,
and if the media can cause Obama to be re-elected, they will do it. For
the life of me, I just do not see how this can be denied.
Written by Steve Kates
March 11th, 2012 at 2:53 pm
Media bias – does it affect voting patterns?
12 comments
I take it as such an obvious fact of life that one of the problems
we on our side of the fence have to deal with, and it is a very
long-standing problem, is the media bias that makes it very difficult to
put our perspective into the public domain without having to go through
the distorting lens of the mainstream media. In a posting
in which I noted that his wins in the lastest rounds of primaries were
being given no serious media coverage and certainly very little positive
coverage, something noticed by many others and not just me, I stated in
an off-handed sort of way that “the narrative, as in all instances, is
in the hands of the American media whose aim is to demoralise the
Republican side as much as possible.” But this then led to a comment by
one of my fellow contributors here at Catallaxy. Samuel J wrote in reply:
<blockquote><blockquote>What’s going on is that the narrative, as in all instances,
is in the hands of the American media whose aim is to
demoralise the Republican side as much as possible.</blockquote>
This type of argument is used by those who think the media should be
regulated and overseen by some independent council for fairness. I don’t
agree with the argument – if Romney doesn’t win the election it will be
because people didn’t vote for him, not because of the media.
</blockquote>
To be frank, I found this something of a surprise. I would think that
to have watched politics at all, certainly everywhere in the English
speaking world, there would be no question that to try to inject a
right-of-centre perspective is seriously difficult. And again, I am
hardly the only one to have made this point. So to clarify matters, I
wrote this response:
<blockquote>You know, Samuel J, we are obviously living in a parallel universe. What kind of statement is this?
<blockquote>If Romney doesn’t win the election it will be because people didn’t vote for him, not because of the media.
</blockquote>
Do you not see any possible cause and effect relationship between who
people vote for and the media that surrounds them? You should have a
look at the extraordinarily interesting book on media bias, Left Turn,
which I reviewed in Quadrant. This is from that review:
<blockquote>Using some very sophisticated econometric techniques, he
estimates that were the media’s bias around 50 instead, the PQ of the
country would move from around 50 to around half that number to
something like 20-25. That is, the population of the United States would
then have views on average far more conservative than the biases
exhibited in the present day by Fox News!
</blockquote>
That is as near a fact as I can conjure about what ought to be the
most obvious problem for anyone running on the right side of the
political fence. It is not, and amongst us has never been, a call to
regulate the media. But if this is invisible to you, whatever remains
visible must often seem difficult to understand.
</blockquote>
I would have left it there except that Samuel J responded in turn.
In his response Samuel J wrote:
<blockquote>Steve – yes, I’m denying that the media can influence public opinion
[my emphasis - SK]. How much, no one really knows. Is it the most
important factor in a number of potential and actual influences on
public opinion – again, unknown.
But let’s say that the media is the principal influence on voting.
And let’s say that democracy demands that voters have accurate
information presented to them to make an informed decision –
otherwise false or biased commentary in the newspapers
will result in voters casting votes different to what they would
if they had unbiased commentary.
Then you are led inexorably into the need to have an overseeing body to bring balance, fairness and accuracy to the media.
Me, I’d prefer (correctly or not) to work on the presumption that
voters are intelligent enough and to sort the wheat from the chaff. That
voters are influenced by a whole host of factors, and that among these
are their peers, friends, personal prejudices etc.
Yes, the media has biased elements – maybe it is dominated by biased
elements. Yes, I often get annoyed about the bias – which I think is
principally left-wing, although there are elements of extremism on the
other side.
And, yes, I think it would be nice if the media had a clear
distinction between news and comment – the former should consist
entirely of facts and be sourced. The latter can have speculation and
biases.
</blockquote>
So his point, as I understand it, is that if we came to the
conclusion that the media have a left wing bias, then we would be forced
to enact some kind of legislation to prevent it, to rectify matters, to
straighten it out. Therefore, it seems, the best way to forestall
having to start regulating the media is to deny that it is biased at all.
Media bias to the left is shown in more studies than the one I quoted in Quadrant.
And there are compensating advantages to the right side since
politicians on the right know they are being watched like hawks so they
tend to be more careful, while those on the left tend to be slipshod
because they are called out less often. Overall, however, this bias
costs votes and support for those on the right. People are less well
informed and it is more difficult to get a message out. The natural
reflexes of the media is somewhere between Fabian and Marxist, with an
almost no-enemies-to-the-left approach. Public debate is stifled and
there is a general drift to the left in policy which is brought to an
end usually only because of the fantastic damage such policies do.
Mitt Romney is now ahead of Barack Obama in the polls 48%-43% only
because the evidence of the harm Obama has done has become so
overwhelming that even with all of the protections offered by the media,
the population in general has begun to understand for themselves that
things must change. But this will still likely be a very close election,
and if the media can cause Obama to be re-elected, they will do it. For
the life of me, I just do not see how this can be denied.
Written by Steve Kates
March 11th, 2012 at 2:53 pm
true lilly wrote:
Mardi Gras launched the logo for
the 2012 Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras today,
but has dropped "Gay and Lesbian" from the event.
The move has sparked vigorous debate without the LGBTI community,
however SGLMG claims that the move was intended the better reflect
the muti-faceted LGBTI community and thus coincides with
the symbol representing infinite love.
After 10 years of being known as New Mardi Gras,
the organisation has changed its name back
to the Sydney Gay & Lesbian Mardi Gras,
despite dropping the words "Gay and Lesbian" from the event.
(oh, so it's
ONLY, EVERYONE ELSE who HAS TO BOW to
the 'gay & lesbian' DEMANDS
SHOVED DOWN THE WORLD'S THROAT.
NOT, The FUCK THE WORLD OVER, LEFT.)
The name change is accompanied by the launch of a new season logo
which was developed with advertising agency Moon Communications Group.
Moon creative director Greg Logan told the Star that
the logo is a universal symbol that connects with everyone in a different way.
"It symbolizes all types of genders coming together and does not
discriminate. its symmetry indicates equality and people coming
together to celebrate love," he said.
This year Mardi Gras will feature guest appearances from RuPaul,
Jonathan Hellyer and Sneaky Sound System.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
Billy Ruben Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:05 am
https://sodlikeproductions.forumotion.com/t1278-ballarat-police-confirm-my-suspicionstrue-lilly-lied-about-car-bombings
well,that was a heap of shit bitch,about as reasoning as this video.Nah,I just shit stir you about God,I kind of think you don't deserve to know him,but come to think of it,you need it more than most...and a little therapy and a heavy regimen of anti-psychotics that you avoid so dilligently,until I ring the mental health authorities come Monday morning.But I have the pleasure,to know,to avoid capture,you'll renounce God,to stay out the loonie bin,that's how I'll rig it...
THREATENED TO STEAL...i OFFERED TO DRIVE ALL THE WAY DOWN AND BACK,$600-700 IN FUEL,TO TAKE IT OFF YOUR HANDS YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT...F*CK YOU.
EVERYONE WILL KNOW THE TRUTH OF THAT,WHEN THEY READ THIS...I WOULD'NT HURT AN ANIMAL,BUT I'D KICK YOU LOWER THAN ANY DOG...LYING BAG OF SHIT...HATE YOU...
[/quote]
DESPITE MY ILL FEELING ON OCCASSION TO SOD AND MANAGEMENT HERE,I TAKE THE TIME TO APOLOGISE,PUTTING YOU UNDER PRESSURE WITH THE CONSTANT COMPLAINTS I CAUSE AND FOR BEING FAIR ABOUT IT AND STAYING IN THE BACKGROUND WHILE THIS EVENT,HAMMERS ITSELF OUT.IT'S BEEN HARD FOR EVERYONE,ESPECIALLY ME,WHEN SO MUCH BETTER THINGS CAN BE WRITTEN,DISCUSSED AND OBSERVED...ONCE THE DRAGON,USES ITS DUNGEON,IT'LL BE LEFT ALONE,TO ITS DEVICES AND SHE CAN SAY WHATEVER SHE WANTS ABOUT PEOPLE...BUT AT LEAST SHE KNOWS HER PLACE...AND EVERYONE ELSE WILL KNOW,JUST HOW SPITEFUL AND PATHETIC,IT REALLY IS...THANKYOU IN ADVANCE,BILLY.
well,that was a heap of shit bitch,about as reasoning as this video.Nah,I just shit stir you about God,I kind of think you don't deserve to know him,but come to think of it,you need it more than most...and a little therapy and a heavy regimen of anti-psychotics that you avoid so dilligently,until I ring the mental health authorities come Monday morning.But I have the pleasure,to know,to avoid capture,you'll renounce God,to stay out the loonie bin,that's how I'll rig it...
As I've said over and over again,retarded one,I have no dealings with Tintin,never spoke to him,if I did,I forgot,obviously.Cori refused to answer me as well,I don't fight for them,I'm using your lies as an example...you are very ungrateful for all the good Tintin did for you,and it's scum like you,that make people lose faith in people and God,who'd follow it,if you're an example of it.I backstabbed a few at DIF and my own friends,first time I ever did it in my life,was the last 18 months,I warned Colin for years,change your attitude,stop the bullshit,lies and rumours you say about your friends and family,the same with Boots and Limelady,they never listened,so I did them.There was a lot of so-called friends,pretending to be one at David Icke forums,whilst keeping me in the dark,of what was being said,and colluding with the bullshit...but I always knew,I just spook them with it,just to let them know,how transparent they always were to me...and I'm proud of it.
Any other hunk of shit you want to bring up.Mountain was a very nice girl there for a while too,I hated her,when she listened to Pinkfreud about me being in love with her,no I was'nt,I just propped her up,cause she was having very big problems at the time with Jose,her guy...as she turned out,she was one of the worst judas's of the lot(Pinkfreud),the very day she got mod-ship,she vowed to f*ck Sean over...I have the PM's,I can screen capture now...do you understand how much I can f*ck these people over know???LOL,ROFLMAO,thankyou,John Drake,love you on the very rare occassion.I have'nt even begun,to stick that knife in real good...and just wait until the people see Limeladies and my last PM together...and the fools who believed I was rude to her...no,I was'nt and Size of Light and Merlincove and Shodan all seen it,but not one,not one of them...supported me...how about that eh?...and look what come out of it.Yeah,I'm consumed by hate for alot of people I used to love...and they deserved every bit of it...and I have'nt even begun to prove it.Oh,I forgave Mountain,you can't stay angry at her,not her fault,she was friends with that lot for years,but she should've stayed out of it...and not spread rumours.Even Hadabusa dropped me from his friends list,how'd the f*ck did he get it wrong,I loved that guy...but he bought the bullshit.I wanted him here,so we could have some fun.That's all...ah,but fark ya's,you all fail before me,as weak people,not to be counted on...in a nutshell,I look after number one these days,you offer me nothing,except target practice...Up Yours,the lot of you...
JUST HAD TO DELELE THE OTHER WORTHLESS SHIT,SO WE CAN DEAL WITH YOUR WORTHLESS LIES...THE PREFECT ACCOUNTANT EH?THE OMNIPOTENT ONE,RIGHTO,WHAT DOES GOD SAY ABOUT LIARS,SLANDERERS,AND CONSPIRATIST SPEAKING AND PREACHING IN HIS NAME...AND ASKING FOR MONEY,WELL?...HUMBLE LITTLE GUYS,YOU'RE CALLING PEOPLE TOGETHER,TRYING TO SCARE ME OFF,I'M THE LONER HERE SWEETIE,YOU SHOVE THAT UP YOUR ARSE,EVERYONE KNOWS YOUR PATTERNS,EVEN ON THESE THREADS YOU URGE TO ATTACK OTHERS,ALL THE TIME,SHOVE IT AND YOUR LIES UP YOUR AHAIRY ARSE,I HATE YOU...AND WILL FINISH WITH YOU,WHEN YOU ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED,GO ON,ADMIT HOW MANY TIMES YOU CONSPIRED ON ME AND IT BLEW BACK IN YOUR FACE,THAT,MY DEAR,IS HOW GOD WORKS,YOU KNOW HIM NOT,I DON'T HIDE MY INTENTION,I ANNOUNCE THEM BEFORE I DO THEM,UP YOURS SUZY RYAN,I GIVE NOT A TOSS FOR YOUR LIES,INTERPRETATIONS OR WELL-BEING,OK?...YOU'VE GONE WAY OVER THE LINE,YOU LAUGH AT MY ILLNESS,I WANT YOU DEAD,OK?,NOW YOU KNOW.
think I'm bluffing,guess again,have no shame in this and will rejoice the victory I have in mind for you...and I promise to pay one visit to you,just for that glee,that satisfaction and I gaze into those vacant scared eyes of yours,you want to be scared Suzy Ryan...you want to be...and we'll find,if your name is Suzy Ryan and someone you're setting up for the fall,such is the amount of lies and bullshit."I Am" was right about you fucktard,"She does'nt half talk a load of shit" and when people see you laugh at my condition and lie about the cats,you'll lose even more of your lousy readership,ha!,you already have,hahahahahaha,you're irrelevant and imbecilic
Billy Ruben wrote:...But I suppose you all knew that,stupid bint,could'nt get any interest and spread rumours about dogfuckers and babyrapers...where it was probably an uncle or step dad who tricked her out.Anyway,I'd love to see the evidence where she tries to extort the forum for money...pathetic she is,anyway,it's a war and it's grizzley,sorry about this to human eyes,but it's the way it is...
She tried extorting Tintin too,everything she accuses one of,believe me,it's the opposite...she's a true lowlife,see it in the street,don't hit it,don't pity it,expectorate on it...in other words,hawk it right back and spit it heavy in her face,that's what I intend on doing...Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:Anyone of unfounded crimes and atrocities ever again I swear,I'll pursue you to the ends of the Earth,your God,will not protect you...
How dare you,pick on someone that can't even defend themselves.
Do you know how much hurt and pain your stupid little game does,how does mine back to you feel? Get it,myopic slag???
Ozpixie would never be what you accuse her off.
Quote: I Am
Jase,
I would not even show this to ozpixie as I know how much it would upset her and trust me, she does not need this sort of disgusting accusation in her life.
I have been slated by the best of them but really don’t give a toss. I know who I am and my friends and family know who I am.. I have been around long enough that it is water off a duck’s back.
Oz on the other hand is a very sweet lady who is not all that savvy to the hatred spread on the net.
I cannot give you too much information but I can assure you she is not the person true lilly believes she is. Her name is not Christine and she has never met or had any contact with lilly. She is not only not from Ballarat, She is not even from the same state.
How's that for showing what little you really know,eh? But still quite prepared to vomit your bullshit.You got no credibility and you make the Anti-Icke movement look cold and hate-filled with no warrant to be...and for that
I THANK YOU
ANYWAY,YOU'RE NOT GETTING LET OFF,WHILST YOU STILL USE GENERAL FORUM,i WILL HAUNT YOU,BACK IN YOUR DUNGEON DRAGON...AND WHILE YOU'RE THERE,ACCUSE ANYBODY OF ANY SEXUAL CRIME AND I WILL TAUNT AND HAUNT YOU MORE...
THIS WILL NOT END,I WILL AWAIT YOU AND DESTROY EVERY SYLLABLE YOU DARE UTTER IN FUTURE...F*CK YOU,IS THE ORDER FOR EVERYDAY,DRAGON...
Billy Ruben wrote:ANSWER ME YOU GOD WHORE,WHY ACCUSE SOMEONE MEEK AND MILD OF AN ATROCITY THAT SHE COULD'NT EVEN READ ABOUT,LET ALONE PERFORM,WITH NO EVIDENCE AS USUAL,BUT YOU SEEM PRE-OCCUPIED WITH THIS SUBJECT,AND NAMED OZPIXIE WRONG,BUT STILL PERSIST,WHY SPREAD VICIOUS LIES AND RUMOURS,JUST SO PEOPLE WOULD TAKE NOTICE OF YOUR POST,BITCH!!!
I ALSO NOTICED YOU NEVER MENTIONED CIGGY AND I FOR MONTHS,UNTIL YOU FOUND I WAS POSTING AT HPANWO...WAS THIS THE BIGGEST BUNGLE YOU AND YOUR ILK MADE,I KNOW SO,HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,F*CK YOU....
ALL THIS JUST TO RAISE YOUR READERSHIP...IF YOU WERE'NT SUCH A SPASTIC,YOU'D STILL BE WHERE YOU WANT TO BE,THE DAVID ICKE FORUMS...NER,NER,NER,NER
Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:I just sent Alison (I am) an email of this thread with your accusations about Ozpixie.As long as it don't go against their non-disclosure agreement,I asked her to inform Christine of this thread and to please give me information why True Lilly,(mental basket case spastic bitch),why would one of Gods' anointed would make such a claim?
I also asked for information about you madam...not where you live,but what you've done to others and the games and back-stabbing you involve yourself with,thankyou Lulzy for admitting this,it was arsehole game players is why I left DIF in the end,but I might just re-activate my account...and keep a low profile...the rant room is too tempting....And you know why arsehole???I'll rant every thread you've done,lost in the bowels of the rant room...Then,I'll ask Ozpixie to take you to court over your accusations,by using the police,(they'll help her...then when it's thrown out of court cause we just found out you're a registered mental patient...a real one!!!...then I will be ever so sorry I spoke ill to you...and forgive you for your harassment and games you play...if not,you're gonna look stupid,at any rate...and if Ozpixie does cough up...and reveals your lies and games the same as everyone else asserts,then your readers,must be as mental and fucked in the head as you...have a nice day.
and just to let the discerning reader know...Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:Hey Mental Patient,since you assert that you can answer questions,without spam I hope,...
What justifies you calling Christine/Ozpixie a goat fucker and that she makes men do it for bribery purposes???
Would you not consider that the men would rather f*ck Ozpixie than goats...but the possibilty is,that the men might rather f*ck a goat than some broken shrunken imp of a person such as yourself???
Why do you always label people goat,dog/fuckers,peadophiles?I have,but they and I know the truth of it...Even proved a few things that go on deaf ears.
You're sick Suzy,real sick...if you get sanctioned in a mental home,I'll forgive you,but you're on the street being a danger to yourself and everybody else...I can con a mental health team Suzy,5 minute chat with you,they'll never let you out,they hate God botherers the most in psyche-wards,drug the absolute crap out of them...Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:true lilly wrote:...and your 'double speak' is so weak and transparent...could it be thatBilly Ruben wrote:
So,where is the sex/porn spam,do you still think beastiality is natural sex???You see,Lilly,it's about interpretations,what you view as natural and loving,the law of the land regards as perverse and criminal...but in danger of giving the judge an erection
you are the local horse rapist that the judges keep letting off...
true lilly wrote:sadly, some 'sick puppies' are so sick, a bullet's their only 'cure'......
... or you could simply'you' 'ninny' 'billy' goat shagger's...
...umm, so 'you' do 'know' Christine
animal raping ex-copper's witch...
...she couldn't get enough of making men fcuk goats...them blackmailing them...
...to stay in her sick death circles forever...I did warn people about her, years ago,
back in the ATS days...mind you, she and her ilk are a dime a dozen cheap slags...
...I'm sure you can find another if she's no longer available...now go,
your own kind...I can't even pity you...
Are you kidding...No,this comes from the lips of True Lilly,it's all batshit...
Lilly,stop telling lies and no,I don't know Christine/OzPixie...Imagine that eh?David Icke Forum Moderators are either Illuminati Shills like Dark Eternal or goat fucking satanist like OzPixie,cause True Lilly tells me so...
No Lilly,I don't think they'll let you back on DIF....EVER.
DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN TRUE LILLY,EVERYONE YOU TAKE A DISLIKE TOO,IS PAINTED A GOATFUCKER,BABYFUCKER OR SOMETHING ELSE.YOU HAVE ISSUES IN THIS AREA,AND IT'S ALL TO DO WITH YOUR PERCEPTION OF YOURSELF.IF YOU WERE MADE TO DO THINGS WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG,IT'S NOT YOUR FAULT,IF YOU INSTIGATED IT,THEN GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON...YOU POINT THE FINGER SUZY,BUT IT'S NOT THE FIRST TIME I HAVE FIGURED YOU OUT,READ YOUR PM ABOUT YOUR FAMILY...Billy Ruben wrote:This is not such a bad way to go actually,my way,I would've destroyed you,but the fall-out for me would be just as bad...this way,we can deal with the FACTS as you've claimed...
Once you have no credibilty,you can post spam to the wall,cause there is no-way anyone will believe you...Hey,how come you have'nt called in the cavalry??? (hOrSeY-Palomino)...when it gets out of control you usually sink to every method that you accuse David Icke and Tintin of...
Gang-stalking,harassment,etc...when the dust settles,was that one little lie that kicked this all off a year ago,...Was it All Worth It?Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:true lilly wrote:Nothing 'private' about this, 'you' 'ninny nong'...
So, which is it?
"Billy Ruben" makes a serious threat, or, he's all lying talk?
From Billy Ruben To true lilly, Today at 4:28 pm
____________________________________________________________________
true lilly wrote:
So, you still haven't figured out why the smarter ones hand-balled you this:
"Keep pushing and I'll destroy you good and proper.", job.
_____________________________________________________________________
quote:Billy Ruben
your a goner mate...
_____________________________________________________________________
Either way...'you & Ciggy' simply shouldn't have spammed, my one thread,
with 'you & Ciggy's' endless public 'conversations' about 'you & Ciggy's'
'beliefs' on when a child is too young or too related to lust after, and then
stepped up 'your' phone and on line harassment, when I asked 'you', again,
to remove that, utterly sick, way off topic, 'conversation' of 'yours',
from my thread, that was 'chopped up' to have 'those conversations'
of 'you & Ciggy', head and end the pages, as if it where my topic...and then cry,
rant, libel, make endless personal threats and try to sound like 'you'
AND 'your' supportive ASSOCIATES are 'good guys'.
Mind you, as 'Billy Ruben & Ciggy' thought it funny at the time of 'that conversation',
that I should ask them to stop spamming my thread with 'their' sick 'fishing', and that
'he' keeps bringing it up, I'd say it's something else that has 'them' worried...as it should.
this is what I mean't you're a goner,you think I'd martyr you...hehehehe,that's how you think,idiot,no,a living permanenet death...I destroyed every credible shred you ever had or beLIEved you had.
This is what I am had to say,the truth...you're a disgusting spiteful shitbag of a person Suzy Ryan...if I get a chance,I'll f*ck you over in court
...Alison won't even show Ozpixie your stuff and I don't blame her,Ozpixie to me was like an Aussie Antiem,a very nice young lady,but Antiem shocked me with her strengths,I always thought Ozpixie was a little softy,like Curtain Cat,very lovely girls...You spiteful stale withered shitbag of a woman,I HATE you properly now...and have no shame in how I treat you,exactly how I treat demons,what I say to them,made them weep...you I will break...I am an old demon in transition,anything that tries stopping me in future,I'll swat,as I do to roaches...
the only thing being threatened is what little credibilty you think you had...call the police,go on,dare you,send your bald headed mate up,I'm in pretty good shape compared to yesterday.F*CK YOU!!!
sucked in...you make me ill...
True Lilly,puts her foot in it:Mind you, as 'Billy Ruben & Ciggy' thought it funny at the time of 'that conversation',
that I should ask them to stop spamming my thread with 'their' sick 'fishing', and that
'he' keeps bringing it up, I'd say it's something else that has 'them' worried...as it should.
Thankyou Suzy,that's exactly what I said,spam a True Lilly shitbox thread to make it interesting and you get painted as a child molester...exactly what I've been saying.
The only disappointing aspect,is you're proving me dead-on with no effort needed,this is all to easy...
THIS SUPER-SPAM CAN BE ALOT OF FUN AND ANNOYANCE,THANKYOU TRUE LILLY,FOR INTIATING ME IN THE SCHOOL OF SECRET ARTS...Billy Ruben wrote:yeah,we remember the car-bombing,you lied and bullshitted about that one too...and sent us a pic of some woman walking a dog as proof,yeah,credible honest god fearing suzy fuckwit ryan...Billy Ruben wrote:NOW THAT YOU SLYLY ADMIT YOU'RE TORTURING THOSE CATS IN YOUR YARD,LIKE I ALWAYS SUSPECT A PATHETIC SLAG LIKE YOU TO DO,JUST TO UPSET ME,WELL F*CK YOU SUZY RYAN,A CAT'S LIFE IS WORTH MORE THAN A 1000 OF YOURS,I DON'T CARE WHO SEES THIS OR DISGUSTED WITH ME OR EVEN LAW ENFORCEMENT,BUT I SWEAR,I'LL CATCH UP WITH YOU AND TEACH YOU WHAT PAIN IS...I SPENT 4 HOURS ON THE NET,LAST NIGHT USING THE WHITE PAGES,BITCH LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE A REGISTERED ADDRESS ON A NORMAL PHONE LINE,SO YEAH,I' NOT TAKING YOUR SHIT THIS TIME...FUCKING DIE BITCH...
GINGER AND WHITE CATS I LOVE AND ADORE,I WAS LAST YEAR,GOING TO DRIVE THERE JUST TO TAKE ONE OR TWO OFF YOUR HANDS...BUT F*CK YOU...YOU DEAD TO ME...
Billy Ruben wrote:...As I and many of you suspected,there was no car bombing,to True Lilly/Vera Susa/Suzy Ryan.Made good on a threat I made to her and rang the police to have her charged with defamation,to myself,her ex-husband and everyone else she has pointed a finger at for the last five years.We went through every detail,including her husband,whom they are tracking down,to give what information I was able to convey to him.
I enquired,she'd be easy to remember,she had a car bombing and put in hospital twice through beatings,not one detail was on file,nor could any officer at the station remember it.SHE'S A TOTAL FAKE ARSE FRAUD....IT'S OUT,SHE PLAYED YOU PEOPLE GOOD AND PROPER FOR YEARS,WHOEVER BOUGHT IT,YOU GULLIBLE LITTLE FOOLS.
Anyway,today is to be counted as great vfictory for truth and sanity,rest assured,the fool thinks she can spam this under the carpet,but it won't work,with due dilligence and participation by all.
You have a duty to do so,The Craig Oxley site went down,so full rebuttals are needed here.
I will not bend,tomorrow,it's the mental health authorities.I did'nt really want her charged,I just wanted her to make a scene with the police,so they lock her in the loonie bin,when that happens,it's usually for 6 months,scheduled.Which she needs for her and your safety.I will not back down and continue with this grubby war against the dragon,my boots are worn and could do with a new shod of leather.Hate her with a passion and will endeavor my best to garner a result.
I just wanted all her enemies to know and understand,everything she ever said,was a hoax,a lie and an attempt to gain favour by readership or money from you,the extortionist bitch.She'll try this on someone in real life and that will be the end of her,good and proper,you'll be reading about her soon enough,not enduring her slabs of lies for much longer and for that,I thankyou,Suzy Ryan.
Billy Ruben wrote:Billy Ruben wrote:WELL,THAT WAS INTERESTING,JUST HAD A CHAT WITH BALLARAT POLICE,ALTHOUGH I CAN'T PRESS CHARGES (INTERNET STALKING),CAUSE I'VE HAD COMMUNICATION WITH HER,BUT TINTIN,"I AM" AND OTHERS,CAN PRESS CHARGES....BUT THE BEST BIT...GET READY...HE CONFIRMED FOR ME....HAHAHAHAHAHA
Billy Ruben wrote:When I push you over the edge and you pull Mr Policeman on me,like I want you too,I have your former husbands' name here,which will come in very handy.Tell me,if your kids seen this,would they be so supportive of you,if they knew you call daddy a baby raping goat fucker?I want to cost you dearly madam,for your years of lies and baseless and groundless accusations,did your husband spam your thread too,Lying C*nt,I bet...
true lilly wrote:ICKE, ASSange, BILL RYAN, CIGGY,
TINTIN, CORI, and so on and on the list
of CON Industry PUSHERS goes...and made
FILTHY 'RICH' through 'their' WORK as
MASS ANTI-SOCIAL MANIPULATORS, who
HATE me FOR being CONTENT with ENOUGH,
NOT ENVYING NOR HATING THE 'TRULY WEALTHY'.
Learn something about cops,they're not in it for justice,they look after their own,corrupt and facilitate evil,you'd better watch it Suzy,Victorian Cops are'nt as lenient as NSW cops,they shoot mental patients down your way,set you up,you'll start rambling with a kitchen knife...and BLAM!!!,they put the rabid idiot out to pasture for ever and ever.Amen...Amen-Ra
Billy Ruben wrote:true lilly wrote:Unhived Mind Website Taken Down...!!!true lilly wrote:
Fine by me,
I got all of my thread on that site,
on hard copy.
Unfortunately, Team Tintin have been flat out,
re-writing all his myths (as if actual history),
on "tintin's", "The News Behind The News" thread,
at.
Fortunately, the readership of that thread has plummeted.
SO WHAT,WHO'D BELIEVE YOU ANYWAY...DON'T HAVE THOSE PHOTOS DO YOU???...OF SAY...A CAR BOMBING???...THOUGHT SO...
ps,SHE DOES'NT HAVE TO LIVE THROUGH THE HUMILIATION THERE ANY MORE,CAN SEE WHY YOU'RE HAPPY...I WANTED TO SEE WHAT WONDER WOMAN HAD TO SAY TO YOU...
LULZ,
so has yours significantly,the Lying Conspiracy has'nt been bumped since Christmas,ROFLMAO,hypocrite...and you're still posting shit from Oxleys site,passing it off as "NEW" news....dribbling on the floor,gasping for air laughter...
true lilly wrote:Talk about full blow delusions...
what doesn't 'Jason'/'Billy Ruben' GET, about BEING IGNORED,
that he simply has to keep texting me about what he's posting?
And despite contradicting himself with and within every text, he's
still hanging onto some insane idea that he's 'winning'?... something???
e.g. the latest just in:...and what doesn't he get about 'them'Billy Ruben wrote:Making progress r
we,god stopping
me,no,ur faith must
be shattered,he looks
after me very
well,bitch
(those 'respected' people he 'defends' ),
trying and failing to 'shatter my faith'
for 50 years, that he believes his overtly
erratic, filthy, violent, mind, could even
come close to breaking my faith in The God,
Who, he and all of 'them', so violently hate?
Especially when all he is doing, is breaking,
'their' (those 'respected' people's), cover 'as',
'worthy of respect', by putting himself up as
'their'
supporter and defender.
well,that was a heap of shit bitch,about as reasoning as this video.Nah,I just shit stir you about God,I kind of think you don't deserve to know him,but come to think of it,you need it more than most...and a little therapy and a heavy regimen of anti-psychotics that you avoid so dilligently,until I ring the mental health authorities come Monday morning.But I have the pleasure,to know,to avoid capture,you'll renounce God,to stay out the loonie bin,that's how I'll rig it...
Billy Ruben wrote:true lilly wrote:I noticed that when you Google, "vera susa david icke", this thread is on the First Page. So Please, read a random selection of "BILLY RUBEN" posts, TO SEE that 'that name' IS A DEMON OBSESSED, MENTALLY ILL (by his own BRAGGING words), BAD LIAR...BAD IN SPIRIT and BAD in that he CAN'T STICK TO THE SAME LIE, IN ONE INCESTUOUS PAEDOPHILE PROMOTING Post. So Thanks, "BILLY RUBEN", getting bitter rants from "you", THREATENING ME WITH ANOTHER CAR BOMB and OTHER VIOLENCE AGAINST MY PERSON AND MY PETS (the Stolen, Dehidrated and Starved "GINGER and WHITE CAT", "you" THREATENED TO STEAL, made it back home, recovered and RAISED HER LARGEST and STRONGEST Litter ever!), gives people GOOD REASON TO READ WHAT "YOU" ARE DESPERATE TO PREVENT PEOPLE READING...posts by 'vera susa'/'true lilly', who SHOWS, THE CONspiracy Of The CONspiracy Industry IS TO SLANDER THE CREATOR OF LIFE, AND SO, DRIVE THE WORLD TO BOW TO THE BEAST.
lying fucking bitch,every word of it and you fool no-one,there's new members here,fully aware of your decrepid dying spirit.Not one word does anyone believe of you,but at least you can see why people beat you up and I would do the same,if you were local and handy,not to use my fist,but to kick you as the low dugfucker that you are,then expectorate upon your mashed in face,you're not worth blowing one's nose on,filth,un-woman like and not up to the spiritual worth,to deliver Gods word.The only idiot that does'nt get it,is stubborn fuckwit you,where's hOrSeY?,burned him like everybody else,by now,what,you blackmailed him to do your bidding before,now he's not here and the harassment is much worse than last time.You lost your own family through your schizoid ramblings,they turned on you,not conspired,because you're a basket case,it was sad to learn at first,but seeing the way you really are spastic,I applaud your former husband,getting them out and to a safer,much more loving woman than you could ever be,you're an incubator,not a woman.
[quote=”Billy Ruben”]Billy Ruben wrote:CARRY ON WITH YOUR SHIT AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE,YOU JUST GAVE AWAY WHY YOU MOUTH OFF ABOUT TINTIN,CAUSE YOU KNOW HE'S GOT TOO MUCH INTEGRITY TO BOTHER WITH A LOSER LIKE YOU AND FOR THAT,I THANK YOU...BUT YOU HAVE MADE PROGRESS,YOU ADMIT YOU'RE NOT RESPECTFUL,EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING TO YOU AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ALMIGHTY,YOU FINALLY GET IT MADAM...BY YOUR OWN WORDS AND KICKED AN "OWN GOAL"...GOOD GIRL MADAM,GOOD GIRL...YOU KNOW HOW TO PLEASE ME AFTER ALL....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
THREATENED TO STEAL...i OFFERED TO DRIVE ALL THE WAY DOWN AND BACK,$600-700 IN FUEL,TO TAKE IT OFF YOUR HANDS YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT...F*CK YOU.
EVERYONE WILL KNOW THE TRUTH OF THAT,WHEN THEY READ THIS...I WOULD'NT HURT AN ANIMAL,BUT I'D KICK YOU LOWER THAN ANY DOG...LYING BAG OF SHIT...HATE YOU...
[/quote]DESPITE MY ILL FEELING ON OCCASSION TO SOD AND MANAGEMENT HERE,I TAKE THE TIME TO APOLOGISE,PUTTING YOU UNDER PRESSURE WITH THE CONSTANT COMPLAINTS I CAUSE AND FOR BEING FAIR ABOUT IT AND STAYING IN THE BACKGROUND WHILE THIS EVENT,HAMMERS ITSELF OUT.IT'S BEEN HARD FOR EVERYONE,ESPECIALLY ME,WHEN SO MUCH BETTER THINGS CAN BE WRITTEN,DISCUSSED AND OBSERVED...ONCE THE DRAGON,USES ITS DUNGEON,IT'LL BE LEFT ALONE,TO ITS DEVICES AND SHE CAN SAY WHATEVER SHE WANTS ABOUT PEOPLE...BUT AT LEAST SHE KNOWS HER PLACE...AND EVERYONE ELSE WILL KNOW,JUST HOW SPITEFUL AND PATHETIC,IT REALLY IS...THANKYOU IN ADVANCE,BILLY.
true lilly wrote:Talk about full blow delusions...
what doesn't 'Jason'/'Billy Ruben' GET, about BEING IGNORED,
that he simply has to keep texting me about what he's posting?
And despite contradicting himself with and within every text, he's
still hanging onto some insane idea that he's 'winning'?... something???
e.g. the latest just in:...and what doesn't he get about 'them'Billy Ruben wrote:Making progress r
we,god stopping
me,no,ur faith must
be shattered,he looks
after me very
well,bitch
(those 'respected' people he 'defends' ),
trying and failing to 'shatter my faith'
for 50 years, that he believes his overtly
erratic, filthy, violent, mind, could even
come close to breaking my faith in The God,
Who, he and all of 'them', so violently hate?
Especially when all he is doing, is breaking,
'their' (those 'respected' people's), cover 'as',
'worthy of respect', by putting himself up as
'their'
supporter and defender.
well,that was a heap of shit bitch,about as reasoning as this video.Nah,I just shit stir you about God,I kind of think you don't deserve to know him,but come to think of it,you need it more than most...and a little therapy and a heavy regimen of anti-psychotics that you avoid so dilligently,until I ring the mental health authorities come Monday morning.But I have the pleasure,to know,to avoid capture,you'll renounce God,to stay out the loonie bin,that's how I'll rig it...
Ok,I know it does'nt suit your arguement,that you keep insisting I have mates and that I'd bother to tell them about this,or would get them involved like you did with Palomino,Sod and any other idiot who had the guts to front up.F*ck you,the last thing I want,is Tintin,coming here,wasting his time,like I do,highlighting your lies that are endless, and when one fails,you invent another,like the injured cats you schizoid shitbag...BUT,you never admit your filthy tactics and the knowledge you get from others,so I'm sending you down the path that I went through with my niece and family,which broke my heart and probably the reason,I MIGHT be developing a serious condition,it's just the doctors word I repeat,but not accept,until the fat lady sings,bitch.Billy Ruben wrote:When I push you over the edge and you pull Mr Policeman on me,like I want you tootrue lilly wrote:ICKE, ASSange, BILL RYAN, CIGGY,
TINTIN, CORI, and so on and on the list
of CON Industry PUSHERS goes...and made
FILTHY 'RICH' through 'their' WORK as
MASS ANTI-SOCIAL MANIPULATORS, who
HATE me FOR being CONTENT with ENOUGH,
NOT ENVYING NOR HATING THE 'TRULY WEALTHY'.
Learn something about cops,they're not in it for justice,they look after their own,corrupt and facilitate evil,you'd better watch it Suzy,Victorian Cops are'nt as lenient as NSW cops,they shoot mental patients down your way,set you up,you'll start rambling with a kitchen knife...and BLAM!!!,they put the rabid idiot out to pasture for ever and ever.Amen...Amen-Ra
As I've said over and over again,retarded one,I have no dealings with Tintin,never spoke to him,if I did,I forgot,obviously.Cori refused to answer me as well,I don't fight for them,I'm using your lies as an example...you are very ungrateful for all the good Tintin did for you,and it's scum like you,that make people lose faith in people and God,who'd follow it,if you're an example of it.I backstabbed a few at DIF and my own friends,first time I ever did it in my life,was the last 18 months,I warned Colin for years,change your attitude,stop the bullshit,lies and rumours you say about your friends and family,the same with Boots and Limelady,they never listened,so I did them.There was a lot of so-called friends,pretending to be one at David Icke forums,whilst keeping me in the dark,of what was being said,and colluding with the bullshit...but I always knew,I just spook them with it,just to let them know,how transparent they always were to me...and I'm proud of it.
Any other hunk of shit you want to bring up.Mountain was a very nice girl there for a while too,I hated her,when she listened to Pinkfreud about me being in love with her,no I was'nt,I just propped her up,cause she was having very big problems at the time with Jose,her guy...as she turned out,she was one of the worst judas's of the lot(Pinkfreud),the very day she got mod-ship,she vowed to f*ck Sean over...I have the PM's,I can screen capture now...do you understand how much I can f*ck these people over know???LOL,ROFLMAO,thankyou,John Drake,love you on the very rare occassion.I have'nt even begun,to stick that knife in real good...and just wait until the people see Limeladies and my last PM together...and the fools who believed I was rude to her...no,I was'nt and Size of Light and Merlincove and Shodan all seen it,but not one,not one of them...supported me...how about that eh?...and look what come out of it.Yeah,I'm consumed by hate for alot of people I used to love...and they deserved every bit of it...and I have'nt even begun to prove it.Oh,I forgave Mountain,you can't stay angry at her,not her fault,she was friends with that lot for years,but she should've stayed out of it...and not spread rumours.Even Hadabusa dropped me from his friends list,how'd the f*ck did he get it wrong,I loved that guy...but he bought the bullshit.I wanted him here,so we could have some fun.That's all...ah,but fark ya's,you all fail before me,as weak people,not to be counted on...in a nutshell,I look after number one these days,you offer me nothing,except target practice...Up Yours,the lot of you...
Billy Ruben wrote:true lilly wrote:Unhived Mind Website Taken Down...!!!true lilly wrote:
Fine by me,
I got all of my thread on that site,
on hard copy.
Unfortunately, Team Tintin have been flat out,
re-writing all his myths (as if actual history),
on "tintin's", "The News Behind The News" thread,
at
Fortunately, the readership of that thread has plummeted.
SO WHAT,WHO'D BELIEVE YOU ANYWAY...DON'T HAVE THOSE PHOTOS DO YOU???...OF SAY...A CAR BOMBING???...THOUGHT SO...
ps,SHE DOES'NT HAVE TO LIVE THROUGH THE HUMILIATION THERE ANY MORE,CAN SEE WHY YOU'RE HAPPY...I WANTED TO SEE WHAT WONDER WOMAN HAD TO SAY TO YOU...
LULZ,
so has yours significantly,the Lying Conspiracy has'nt been bumped since Christmas,ROFLMAO,hypocrite...and you're still posting shit from Oxleys site,passing it off as "NEW" news....dribbling on the floor,gasping for air laughter...
true lilly wrote:Seriously 'Jason',
how can 'they' keep going around
charging people to be hypnotized,
to believe they were healed 'by jayssusss'
(who the schills pocketing the dough,
claim to 'channel'
when you're running around telling the world that
all your best 'mates'
(the one's you're 'defending', 'from' me???),
are blood sacrificing satanists???
And then there's all those other,
butter wouldn't melt in their
(stone, cold, dead), mouths,
(ANTI) 'social worker' types, who
teach children how to 'stay out of trouble',
when committing the criminal acts that
'they' have also taught them.
You know, all those who go around
wearing a mask of 'respectability'
while laughing at the their victims
for not smelling the devil behind the mask.
And still the texts continue; ha! and proving
'Billy Ruben' can't even grasp that concept.
The idiot doesn't know the difference between,
'a mask of respectability' and
'being worthy of respect'...or does, and believes
that the former has more 'currency',
simply because,
The Mask Wearing Demons, Out-Number
the humble little good guys...but 'they' always,
fail to take into account, that,
The Perfect Accountant IS Keeping Perfect Account.
...and that, not only are, wolves hiding among the sheep...
...but watchmen, are hidden amongst the wolves...
JUST HAD TO DELELE THE OTHER WORTHLESS SHIT,SO WE CAN DEAL WITH YOUR WORTHLESS LIES...THE PREFECT ACCOUNTANT EH?THE OMNIPOTENT ONE,RIGHTO,WHAT DOES GOD SAY ABOUT LIARS,SLANDERERS,AND CONSPIRATIST SPEAKING AND PREACHING IN HIS NAME...AND ASKING FOR MONEY,WELL?...HUMBLE LITTLE GUYS,YOU'RE CALLING PEOPLE TOGETHER,TRYING TO SCARE ME OFF,I'M THE LONER HERE SWEETIE,YOU SHOVE THAT UP YOUR ARSE,EVERYONE KNOWS YOUR PATTERNS,EVEN ON THESE THREADS YOU URGE TO ATTACK OTHERS,ALL THE TIME,SHOVE IT AND YOUR LIES UP YOUR AHAIRY ARSE,I HATE YOU...AND WILL FINISH WITH YOU,WHEN YOU ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED,GO ON,ADMIT HOW MANY TIMES YOU CONSPIRED ON ME AND IT BLEW BACK IN YOUR FACE,THAT,MY DEAR,IS HOW GOD WORKS,YOU KNOW HIM NOT,I DON'T HIDE MY INTENTION,I ANNOUNCE THEM BEFORE I DO THEM,UP YOURS SUZY RYAN,I GIVE NOT A TOSS FOR YOUR LIES,INTERPRETATIONS OR WELL-BEING,OK?...YOU'VE GONE WAY OVER THE LINE,YOU LAUGH AT MY ILLNESS,I WANT YOU DEAD,OK?,NOW YOU KNOW.
Billy Ruben wrote:so,everything True lilly says is the opposite...and a fooking lie...
lets investigate the reversal to her name
TRUE = LYING
LILLY = VAGINA
PUT TOGETHER...
LYING C*NT...THAT'S YOUR NAME FOR NOW ON SHITBAG...
http://www.health.vic.gov.au/mentalhealth/services/adult/grampians-a.htmBilly Ruben wrote:I might just start hunting around for what I really believe,you've been lying about money and more than one occassion try to extort or will it away from people.
YOU SEE TRUE LILLY,YOU'RE SO LUCKY,TINTIN IS SUCH A GENTLEMAN WITH INTEGRITY AND WOULD'NT WASTE HIS TIME ARGUING WITH A SCHIZOID LIKE YOU,SULLYING HIS NAME TO DEFEND AGAINST YOUR LIES AND ACCUSATIONS...OTHERWISE,I'D UTILIZE EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO BREAK YOU.NO HOLDS BARRED.MY NAME IS MUD LONG AGO,SO DO YOU THINK I CARE HOW I LOOK,NO....BUT MUCH MORE INTERESTING THAN YOU WILL EVER BE,CAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO BE A NORMAL PERSON.NOTICE KABONG AND I HAVE A GOOD TIME IN THAT WOODSTOCK THREAD AND YOU COME ALONG,SEE,THERE'S NOTHING TO YOU BUT MINDLESS LIES AND DRIVEL....HAHAHAHAHAHA,I STILL HAVE MY FAMILY AFTER REAL TRIALS MADAM,I DO MORE OF GODS WORK THAN YOU'LL EVER COMPREHEND,YOU'RE NOTHING...BUT A MORONIC SCHIZOID AND A DANGEROUS ONE...
think I'm bluffing,guess again,have no shame in this and will rejoice the victory I have in mind for you...and I promise to pay one visit to you,just for that glee,that satisfaction and I gaze into those vacant scared eyes of yours,you want to be scared Suzy Ryan...you want to be...and we'll find,if your name is Suzy Ryan and someone you're setting up for the fall,such is the amount of lies and bullshit."I Am" was right about you fucktard,"She does'nt half talk a load of shit" and when people see you laugh at my condition and lie about the cats,you'll lose even more of your lousy readership,ha!,you already have,hahahahahaha,you're irrelevant and imbecilic
Billy Ruben- Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:11 am
Creeps free to work with kids
Peter Mickelburough, Grant McArthur
REVEALED: A KILLER stepfather,
thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children.
Welfare: Police warned to leave teenagers alone
yep, our Red/Green/Left 'public' 'servants'
give us...teenage thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children...and...
Another, $60 Million To Our INVADERS,
to Help FIGHT US IN OUR COURTS,
to MAKE US LET THEM STAY...
and FORCE Their RELIGIOUS LAWS,
INTO OUR COURTS and LAW!
Lawyers win $60m to fight for refugees
Steve Lewis
EXCLUSIVE:
TAXPAYERS will pay at least $60 million
in free legal advice for asylum seekers
this year,
an investigation has revealed.
Peter Mickelburough, Grant McArthur
REVEALED: A KILLER stepfather,
thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children.
Welfare: Police warned to leave teenagers alone
yep, our Red/Green/Left 'public' 'servants'
give us...teenage thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children...and...
Another, $60 Million To Our INVADERS,
to Help FIGHT US IN OUR COURTS,
to MAKE US LET THEM STAY...
and FORCE Their RELIGIOUS LAWS,
INTO OUR COURTS and LAW!
Lawyers win $60m to fight for refugees
Steve Lewis
EXCLUSIVE:
TAXPAYERS will pay at least $60 million
in free legal advice for asylum seekers
this year,
an investigation has revealed.
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:43 am
Why does Thomson seem a protected species?
It's not Craig Thompson, but his very close, blood relation,
and her very large, extended, scattered among Left, Right, Centre,
Red, Blue, Green, Plain, Checkered and All Stripes, but yet,
'strangle hold' tight, family.
She's known as Ms. Box; Pandora.
Breaking News: 'Protected Species' Title Lifted.
The lid has been lifted on the family of Ms. Pandora Box.
Having reached Globally Threatening Plague proportions,
culls have already begun.
All members who fail to divorce themselves
from the family of Ms. Pandora Box,
by a yet to be disclosed date,
will be classed as 'Non-persons' and
given 'After Birth Abortions'.
It was revealed that plague numbers went unnoticed for
so long, due to the Shredding, withholding, burying and
deliberate altering of records, by family members of the,
once powerful Ms. Pandora Box, deliberately placed in
'respected' positions, such as medicine, the judiciary,
policing, education and every other 'public service' roll.
Creeps free to work with kids
Peter Mickelburough, Grant McArthur
REVEALED: A KILLER stepfather,
thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children.
Welfare: Police warned to leave teenagers alone
yep, our Red/Green/Left 'public' 'servants'
give us...teenage thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children...and...
Another, $60 Million To Our INVADERS,
to Help FIGHT US IN OUR COURTS,
to MAKE US LET THEM STAY...
and FORCE Their RELIGIOUS LAWS,
INTO OUR COURTS and LAW!
Lawyers win $60m to fight for refugees
Steve Lewis
EXCLUSIVE:
TAXPAYERS will pay at least $60 million
in free legal advice for asylum seekers
this year,
an investigation has revealed.
God's Gonna Cut You Down :
https://youtu.be/wxh-FfElY0M
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambiler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down.
Well my goodness gracious,
Let me tell you the news.
My heads been wet with the midnight dew.
I've been down on bended knee,
Talkin to the man from Galiee.
He spoke to me in a voice so sweet,
I thought I heard the shuffle of angels feet.
He called my name and my heart stood still,
When He said "John go do my will"
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down.
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
You can throw your rock, hide your hand,
Workin in the dark against your fellow man.
But as sure as God made black and white,
What's done in the dark,
Will be brought to the light.
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
WHO BY FIRE
https://youtu.be/j2T274bXIxU
And who by fire?
Who by water?
Who in the sunshine?
Who in the night time?
Who by high ordeal?
Who by common trial?
Who in your merry merry month of May?
Who by very slow decay?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who in her lonely slip?
Who by barbiturate?
Who in these realms of love?
Who by something blunt?
Who by avalanche?
Who by powder?
Who for his greed?
Who for his hunger?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who by brave assent?
Who by accident?
Who in solitude?
Who in this mirror?
Who by his lady's command?
Who by his own hand?
Who in mortal chains?
Who in power?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who by fire?
Who by water?
Who in the sunshine?
Who in the night time?
Who by high ordeal?
Who by common trial?
Who in your merry merry month of May?
Who by very slow decay?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
It's not Craig Thompson, but his very close, blood relation,
and her very large, extended, scattered among Left, Right, Centre,
Red, Blue, Green, Plain, Checkered and All Stripes, but yet,
'strangle hold' tight, family.
She's known as Ms. Box; Pandora.
Breaking News: 'Protected Species' Title Lifted.
The lid has been lifted on the family of Ms. Pandora Box.
Having reached Globally Threatening Plague proportions,
culls have already begun.
All members who fail to divorce themselves
from the family of Ms. Pandora Box,
by a yet to be disclosed date,
will be classed as 'Non-persons' and
given 'After Birth Abortions'.
It was revealed that plague numbers went unnoticed for
so long, due to the Shredding, withholding, burying and
deliberate altering of records, by family members of the,
once powerful Ms. Pandora Box, deliberately placed in
'respected' positions, such as medicine, the judiciary,
policing, education and every other 'public service' roll.
Creeps free to work with kids
Peter Mickelburough, Grant McArthur
REVEALED: A KILLER stepfather,
thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children.
Welfare: Police warned to leave teenagers alone
yep, our Red/Green/Left 'public' 'servants'
give us...teenage thugs and fiends
have all been given the go-ahead
to work with children...and...
Another, $60 Million To Our INVADERS,
to Help FIGHT US IN OUR COURTS,
to MAKE US LET THEM STAY...
and FORCE Their RELIGIOUS LAWS,
INTO OUR COURTS and LAW!
Lawyers win $60m to fight for refugees
Steve Lewis
EXCLUSIVE:
TAXPAYERS will pay at least $60 million
in free legal advice for asylum seekers
this year,
an investigation has revealed.
God's Gonna Cut You Down :
https://youtu.be/wxh-FfElY0M
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambiler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down.
Well my goodness gracious,
Let me tell you the news.
My heads been wet with the midnight dew.
I've been down on bended knee,
Talkin to the man from Galiee.
He spoke to me in a voice so sweet,
I thought I heard the shuffle of angels feet.
He called my name and my heart stood still,
When He said "John go do my will"
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down.
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
You can throw your rock, hide your hand,
Workin in the dark against your fellow man.
But as sure as God made black and white,
What's done in the dark,
Will be brought to the light.
You can run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Run on for a long time,
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Sooner, or later, God'll cut you down.
Go and tell that long tongue liar,
Go and tell that midnight rider,
Tell the rambler, the gambler, the back biter,
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
WHO BY FIRE
https://youtu.be/j2T274bXIxU
And who by fire?
Who by water?
Who in the sunshine?
Who in the night time?
Who by high ordeal?
Who by common trial?
Who in your merry merry month of May?
Who by very slow decay?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who in her lonely slip?
Who by barbiturate?
Who in these realms of love?
Who by something blunt?
Who by avalanche?
Who by powder?
Who for his greed?
Who for his hunger?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who by brave assent?
Who by accident?
Who in solitude?
Who in this mirror?
Who by his lady's command?
Who by his own hand?
Who in mortal chains?
Who in power?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
And who by fire?
Who by water?
Who in the sunshine?
Who in the night time?
Who by high ordeal?
Who by common trial?
Who in your merry merry month of May?
Who by very slow decay?
And who shall I say is calling?
(Who shall I say is calling?)
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:32 am
Police should charge Fair Work officials
Piers Akerman Tuesday, March 13, 2012 (5:35am)
181 Comments
Fair Work Australia general manager Bernadette O’Neill is denying
Victorian police access to transcripts of interviews of witnesses who
gave evidence about alleged corruption involving Labor MP Craig Thomson.
She should be charged with obstruction of justice.
Fair Work Australia has been “investigating” Thomson for some three
years - longer than the investigation into the assassination of US
President John F. Kennedy.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard says Thomson, has her full support.
Those who don’t rely on Thomson’s Labor vote say it looks as if Fair
Work Australia is dragging its feet for blatantly political purposes.
Thomson is being investigated by both the Victorian and NSW police.
The Australian’s Ean Higgins reports that Victorian detectives believe
the transcripts, apart from being of considerable general assistance,
could potentially catch out some witnesses as lying under oath and
enable them to be charged with being accessories after the fact.
A source close to the Victorian police investigation has told The
Australian that because FWA conducted its interviews before many of the
more damaging allegations surrounding Thomson and his associates became
public over the past seven months, some witnesses may have presented a
different story at that time.
The source said it was Ms O’Neill’s refusal to provide the transcripts
that led to anger among Victorian police commanders who are seeking to
gather key evidence to bring charges against one or more individuals.
FWA has spent three years investigating alleged financial malpractice in
the national office of the Health Services Union, and specific
allegations that Thomson, when he was HSU national secretary between
2002 and 2007, misused his union credit card in a splurge of more than
$100,000 of personal spending including on prostitutes.
Thomson strenuously denies the allegations.
FWA interviewed a large number of serving and former union officials under oath, including, in 2010, Thomson.
Victorian police are investigating the same allegations with a view to
determining if Thomson committed fraud, and whether other union
officials were complicit.
In Senate estimates last month O’Neill defended the legal right of her
predecessor, Tim Lee, to refuse to speak to a senior NSW police
commander about the Thomson investigation.
NSW Strikeforce Carnarvon is investigating allegations Thomson and HSU
East general secretary Michael Williamson took secret commissions from a
graphic designer, John Gilleland, who has a $680,000 annual contract
with the union and whose premises were recently raided by police.
Thomson, Williamson and Gilleland deny any wrongdoing.
The Coalition yesterday stepped up pressure on the issue, with Tony
Abbott attempting to sheet home some responsibility to Julia Gillard,
who has deflected questions, saying FWA is an independent body.
“Here is a federal agency that is refusing to co-operate in a criminal
investigation and if the Prime Minister has no opinion on this, well
frankly, she becomes complicit in . . . what looks like a cover up of
some very, very low acts,” Abbott said.
Oposition workplace relations spokesman Eric Abetz called on FWA
president Iain Ross to direct O’Neill to co-operate with police.
He cited section 655(2) of the Fair Work Act, which says that the
president may disclose information “likely to assist in the
administration or enforcement of a law of the commonwealth, a state or a
territory”.
It should not be necessary to remind a senior public servant (or anyone else) that they have a duty to uphold the law.
The circumstances of the Thomson investigation stink.
If the Labor federal government’s agencies are not prepared to work with
police, why should members of the public feel they have a duty to help
whenever they can?
Gillard must act, the president of FWA Iain Ross must act.
If they do not, they are demonstrating contempt for the nation and its laws.
__________________________
181 Comments
Piers Akerman Tuesday, March 13, 2012 (5:35am)
181 Comments
Fair Work Australia general manager Bernadette O’Neill is denying
Victorian police access to transcripts of interviews of witnesses who
gave evidence about alleged corruption involving Labor MP Craig Thomson.
She should be charged with obstruction of justice.
Fair Work Australia has been “investigating” Thomson for some three
years - longer than the investigation into the assassination of US
President John F. Kennedy.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard says Thomson, has her full support.
Those who don’t rely on Thomson’s Labor vote say it looks as if Fair
Work Australia is dragging its feet for blatantly political purposes.
Thomson is being investigated by both the Victorian and NSW police.
The Australian’s Ean Higgins reports that Victorian detectives believe
the transcripts, apart from being of considerable general assistance,
could potentially catch out some witnesses as lying under oath and
enable them to be charged with being accessories after the fact.
A source close to the Victorian police investigation has told The
Australian that because FWA conducted its interviews before many of the
more damaging allegations surrounding Thomson and his associates became
public over the past seven months, some witnesses may have presented a
different story at that time.
The source said it was Ms O’Neill’s refusal to provide the transcripts
that led to anger among Victorian police commanders who are seeking to
gather key evidence to bring charges against one or more individuals.
FWA has spent three years investigating alleged financial malpractice in
the national office of the Health Services Union, and specific
allegations that Thomson, when he was HSU national secretary between
2002 and 2007, misused his union credit card in a splurge of more than
$100,000 of personal spending including on prostitutes.
Thomson strenuously denies the allegations.
FWA interviewed a large number of serving and former union officials under oath, including, in 2010, Thomson.
Victorian police are investigating the same allegations with a view to
determining if Thomson committed fraud, and whether other union
officials were complicit.
In Senate estimates last month O’Neill defended the legal right of her
predecessor, Tim Lee, to refuse to speak to a senior NSW police
commander about the Thomson investigation.
NSW Strikeforce Carnarvon is investigating allegations Thomson and HSU
East general secretary Michael Williamson took secret commissions from a
graphic designer, John Gilleland, who has a $680,000 annual contract
with the union and whose premises were recently raided by police.
Thomson, Williamson and Gilleland deny any wrongdoing.
The Coalition yesterday stepped up pressure on the issue, with Tony
Abbott attempting to sheet home some responsibility to Julia Gillard,
who has deflected questions, saying FWA is an independent body.
“Here is a federal agency that is refusing to co-operate in a criminal
investigation and if the Prime Minister has no opinion on this, well
frankly, she becomes complicit in . . . what looks like a cover up of
some very, very low acts,” Abbott said.
Oposition workplace relations spokesman Eric Abetz called on FWA
president Iain Ross to direct O’Neill to co-operate with police.
He cited section 655(2) of the Fair Work Act, which says that the
president may disclose information “likely to assist in the
administration or enforcement of a law of the commonwealth, a state or a
territory”.
It should not be necessary to remind a senior public servant (or anyone else) that they have a duty to uphold the law.
The circumstances of the Thomson investigation stink.
If the Labor federal government’s agencies are not prepared to work with
police, why should members of the public feel they have a duty to help
whenever they can?
Gillard must act, the president of FWA Iain Ross must act.
If they do not, they are demonstrating contempt for the nation and its laws.
__________________________
181 Comments
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:02 pm
Back to eugenics with the greens
Andrew Bolt March 14 (6:44am)
The green movement
I remember being attacked when I warned of the strong links between Nazism and Germany’s green groups in the 1930s. The totalitarian instinct, and the disregard for the individual, seemed only too common to both ideologies.
Now, as the global warming faith develops, the links I warned off grow
far less tenuous. Take the latest idea - to breed a race of
super-greens. Yes, we’re back to eugenics again:
<blockquote>The threat of global climate change has prompted us
to redesign many of our technologies to be more energy-efficient… So,
some scholars are asking, what if we could engineer human beings to be more energy efficient?
A new paper to be published in Ethics, Policy & Environment
proposes a series of biomedical modifications that could help humans,
themselves, consume less…
For instance, the paper suggests that parents could make use of genetic
engineering or hormone therapy in order to birth smaller, less
resource-intensive children.
</blockquote>
Of course, reassurances are given. I mean, we’re none of us brutes these days, right?
<blockquote>The lead author of the paper, S. Matthew Liao, is a professor of
philosophy and bioethics at New York University.... Neither Liao or his
co-authors, Anders Sandberg and Rebecca Roache of Oxford, approve of
any coercive human engineering; they favor modifications borne of
individual choices, not technocratic mandates.
</blockquote>
But actually, that’s false. Liao makes clear that his proposal include
modifying fetuses - a most coercive form of human engineering:
<blockquote>Liao: ... Each kilogram of body mass requires a
certain amount of food and nutrients… And so size reduction could be one
way to reduce a person’s ecological footprint....
You might try to do it through a technique called preimplantation
genetic diagnosis, which is already used in IVF settings in fertility
clinics today. In this scenario you’d be looking to select which embryos
to implant based on height.
Another way to affect height is to use a hormone treatment to trigger the closing of the epiphyseal plate earlier than normal---this
sometimes happens by accident in vitamin overdose cases. In fact
hormone treatments are already used for height reduction in overly tall
children. A final way you could do this is by way of gene imprinting, by
influencing the competition between maternal and paternal genes, where
there is a height disparity between the mother and father.
</blockquote>
The obvious question is asked:
<blockquote>Isn’t it ethically problematic to allow parents to make these kinds of irreversible choices for their children?
</blockquote>
And that totalitarian instinct is then revealed - that casual sacrifice of an individual to the great cause:
<blockquote>Liao: That’s a really good question..... With
selection you don’t really have the issue of irreversible choices
because the embryo selected can’t complain that she could have been
otherwise..l. In the case of modification, that issue could certainly
arise, but even then I think it’s important to step back and ask
why we are looking at these solutions in the first place. The reason we
are even considering these solutions is to prevent climate change,
which is a really serious problem
</blockquote>
Actually, a far bigger problem than climate change is this return to
eugenics - the modification of children on ideological grounds. What
next? The “euthanasia” of people too ungreen to live?
Proposals for mass sterilisation?
Oops. We’ve had that already.
(Via Watts Up With That.)
______________________________
Drive-by shooting led to pistols in the post -
inside Sydney's suburban arms trade
Yoni Bashan The Daily Telegraph March 14, 2012 12:00AM
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-nsw/drive-by-shooting-led-to-pistols-in-the-post-inside-sydneys-suburban-arms-trade/story-e6freuzi-1226298627215
Gun syndicate linked to Sydney post office
AAP March 13, 2012 10:49PM
THREE people have been charged after
Australian and German detectives smashed an international gun-smuggling
syndicate alleged to have been run, at least in part, from a suburban
Sydney post office.
Police raided 11 properties in Sydney yesterday morning, including
Sylvania Waters post office, in the city's south, eight homes and an
import business.
They arrested three men, including a 30-year-old post office licensee,
a 21-year-old worker at the import business and
a 27-year-old telecommunications technician.
The men were charged with a raft of offences including supplying firearms,
aggravated possession of firearms and participating in a criminal group.
All were refused bail and are due to appear at Burwood and Sutherland local courts today.
It's alleged the trio were part of a syndicate importing Glock pistols from
Austria via a gun dealership in Remscheid, west Germany, using falsified
documents.
Police began an investigation the operation in February after tracing guns found in Sydney, including a Glock linked to a shooting in Campsie in late January, to a batch made in Austria.
The weapons were traced to the German gun dealership, which is alleged to have
imported them to Australia using false consignment data.
Sylvania Waters post office is alleged to have been the end destination for the guns before they were distributed to bikie and Middle Eastern gangs across the city.
"We will be alleging these guns were being imported specifically for use by criminals, including outlaw motorcycle gang members and those in Middle Eastern organised crime groups," NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said in a statement.
"One firearm has been linked to a south-western Sydney shooting and we are
making further inquiries to see if others are similarly linked."
A fourth person, a 28-year-old woman, was also arrested in Sydney and was being questioned last night.
German detectives arrested a man in connection with the investigation after raiding a number of properties in Remscheid yesterday and seizing a number of documents and parcels.
Detectives involved in the Sydney raids also seized a parcel
containing 140 Glock magazines, seven firearms, ammunition,
drugs and computer equipment.
_______________________________________________
Most Commented
Labor only has one policy - target Tony 284
Police should charge Fair Work officials 200
...and if you still refuse to see
the DIRECT LINKS between:
The MEDICAL INDUSTRY;
Those Campaigning For LATE TERM 'Abortion'
and LEGALIZED BABY MURDER
('as' AFTER BIRTH 'Abortion');
'EDUCATORS';
LABOR, GREENS and
THEIR CAMPAIGN to FLOOD AUSTRALIA with
RELIGIOUSLY AVOWED ENEMIES of ALL
FREE From ENSLAVEMENT To ISLAM,
WHILE TRASHING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH that
THIS UNIQUELY BLESSED LAND WAS BUILT ON,
YOU ARE A WILLING SLAVE of THE DEVIL.
EXPECT 'his' 'REWARDS'!
Andrew Bolt March 14 (6:44am)
The green movement
I remember being attacked when I warned of the strong links between Nazism and Germany’s green groups in the 1930s. The totalitarian instinct, and the disregard for the individual, seemed only too common to both ideologies.
Now, as the global warming faith develops, the links I warned off grow
far less tenuous. Take the latest idea - to breed a race of
super-greens. Yes, we’re back to eugenics again:
<blockquote>The threat of global climate change has prompted us
to redesign many of our technologies to be more energy-efficient… So,
some scholars are asking, what if we could engineer human beings to be more energy efficient?
A new paper to be published in Ethics, Policy & Environment
proposes a series of biomedical modifications that could help humans,
themselves, consume less…
For instance, the paper suggests that parents could make use of genetic
engineering or hormone therapy in order to birth smaller, less
resource-intensive children.
</blockquote>
Of course, reassurances are given. I mean, we’re none of us brutes these days, right?
<blockquote>The lead author of the paper, S. Matthew Liao, is a professor of
philosophy and bioethics at New York University.... Neither Liao or his
co-authors, Anders Sandberg and Rebecca Roache of Oxford, approve of
any coercive human engineering; they favor modifications borne of
individual choices, not technocratic mandates.
</blockquote>
But actually, that’s false. Liao makes clear that his proposal include
modifying fetuses - a most coercive form of human engineering:
<blockquote>Liao: ... Each kilogram of body mass requires a
certain amount of food and nutrients… And so size reduction could be one
way to reduce a person’s ecological footprint....
You might try to do it through a technique called preimplantation
genetic diagnosis, which is already used in IVF settings in fertility
clinics today. In this scenario you’d be looking to select which embryos
to implant based on height.
Another way to affect height is to use a hormone treatment to trigger the closing of the epiphyseal plate earlier than normal---this
sometimes happens by accident in vitamin overdose cases. In fact
hormone treatments are already used for height reduction in overly tall
children. A final way you could do this is by way of gene imprinting, by
influencing the competition between maternal and paternal genes, where
there is a height disparity between the mother and father.
</blockquote>
The obvious question is asked:
<blockquote>Isn’t it ethically problematic to allow parents to make these kinds of irreversible choices for their children?
</blockquote>
And that totalitarian instinct is then revealed - that casual sacrifice of an individual to the great cause:
<blockquote>Liao: That’s a really good question..... With
selection you don’t really have the issue of irreversible choices
because the embryo selected can’t complain that she could have been
otherwise..l. In the case of modification, that issue could certainly
arise, but even then I think it’s important to step back and ask
why we are looking at these solutions in the first place. The reason we
are even considering these solutions is to prevent climate change,
which is a really serious problem
</blockquote>
Actually, a far bigger problem than climate change is this return to
eugenics - the modification of children on ideological grounds. What
next? The “euthanasia” of people too ungreen to live?
Proposals for mass sterilisation?
Oops. We’ve had that already.
(Via Watts Up With That.)
______________________________
Drive-by shooting led to pistols in the post -
inside Sydney's suburban arms trade
Yoni Bashan The Daily Telegraph March 14, 2012 12:00AM
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-nsw/drive-by-shooting-led-to-pistols-in-the-post-inside-sydneys-suburban-arms-trade/story-e6freuzi-1226298627215
Gun syndicate linked to Sydney post office
AAP March 13, 2012 10:49PM
THREE people have been charged after
Australian and German detectives smashed an international gun-smuggling
syndicate alleged to have been run, at least in part, from a suburban
Sydney post office.
Police raided 11 properties in Sydney yesterday morning, including
Sylvania Waters post office, in the city's south, eight homes and an
import business.
They arrested three men, including a 30-year-old post office licensee,
a 21-year-old worker at the import business and
a 27-year-old telecommunications technician.
The men were charged with a raft of offences including supplying firearms,
aggravated possession of firearms and participating in a criminal group.
All were refused bail and are due to appear at Burwood and Sutherland local courts today.
It's alleged the trio were part of a syndicate importing Glock pistols from
Austria via a gun dealership in Remscheid, west Germany, using falsified
documents.
Police began an investigation the operation in February after tracing guns found in Sydney, including a Glock linked to a shooting in Campsie in late January, to a batch made in Austria.
The weapons were traced to the German gun dealership, which is alleged to have
imported them to Australia using false consignment data.
Sylvania Waters post office is alleged to have been the end destination for the guns before they were distributed to bikie and Middle Eastern gangs across the city.
"We will be alleging these guns were being imported specifically for use by criminals, including outlaw motorcycle gang members and those in Middle Eastern organised crime groups," NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said in a statement.
"One firearm has been linked to a south-western Sydney shooting and we are
making further inquiries to see if others are similarly linked."
A fourth person, a 28-year-old woman, was also arrested in Sydney and was being questioned last night.
German detectives arrested a man in connection with the investigation after raiding a number of properties in Remscheid yesterday and seizing a number of documents and parcels.
Detectives involved in the Sydney raids also seized a parcel
containing 140 Glock magazines, seven firearms, ammunition,
drugs and computer equipment.
_______________________________________________
| Which Genesis story should Christians believe? | 378 |
Police should charge Fair Work officials 200
...and if you still refuse to see
the DIRECT LINKS between:
The MEDICAL INDUSTRY;
Those Campaigning For LATE TERM 'Abortion'
and LEGALIZED BABY MURDER
('as' AFTER BIRTH 'Abortion');
'EDUCATORS';
LABOR, GREENS and
THEIR CAMPAIGN to FLOOD AUSTRALIA with
RELIGIOUSLY AVOWED ENEMIES of ALL
FREE From ENSLAVEMENT To ISLAM,
WHILE TRASHING THE CHRISTIAN FAITH that
THIS UNIQUELY BLESSED LAND WAS BUILT ON,
YOU ARE A WILLING SLAVE of THE DEVIL.
EXPECT 'his' 'REWARDS'!
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:06 pm
Craig Thomson taken to hospital
Phillip Hudson
CONTROVERSIAL Labor MP Craig Thomson
has been given leave from Parliament
because of potential appendicitis.
CONTROVERSIAL Federal Labor MP Craig Thomson
has been taken to Canberra Hospital with stomach pains
and given leave from Parliament today.
Mr Thomson's office told the Herald Sun
the MP had "pains in his stomach yesterday
and they got worse overnight".
He went to hospital this morning and
is having tests.
Government Whip Joel Fitzgibbon said Mr Thomson has been granted a parliamentary
"pair'' which means Labor will not be down a vote because of the absence. This is a common procedure.
Mr Fitzgibbon put a message on Twitter saying Mr Thomson may have appendicitis.
"Looks like Craig Thomson has appendicitis. May have to come out but he's fine.''
Mr Thomson is at the centre of allegations - which he denies - that he
misused a union credit card to pay for prostitutes in his former role as
national secretary of the Health Services Union.
The allegations are being investigated by Fair Work Australia.
Victoria and NSW police are also examining it.
_____________
One wonders if he's more, or less safe, among 'his old comrades',
that he's brought to the very negative attention of the nation with
so many people on years long waiting lists for tests and treatment
of painful and life threatening illness.
Sunday? Monday? Tuesday? Wednesday, he goes in?
Could it be that he to, wonders how safe it is for him
to trust 'his old comrades' to 'assess' and 'treat' him.
"He got I think some stomach pains, some abdominal pains, yesterday,"
the spokesman said.
"I think it’s really been since the beginning of the week."
Mr Thomson's spokesman said
the MP was "just being checked up at the moment".
"At this stage he's there still being assessed."
"Looks like Craig Thomson has appendicitis,"
he wrote on the social networking site.
"(It) may have to come out but he's fine."
Prime Minister Julia Gillard said
Mr Thomson will likely be back at work in "a day or two".
Gee, wonder if he'll be lucky, and this is one time Gillard hasn't lied.
After all, "still being assessed" for "likely appendicitis",
then booking surgery (cancelling someone else's?),
fasting and preparation for surgery, surgery, recovery from surgery...
that alone, should, take, 'a day or two', plus...
that's an awful lot of opportunity for 'something to go wrong',
but JuLIAR 'says' he'll "likely be back at work, in a day or two"...
but then again, a day or two at the hands of medicos,
is all a faithless body needs, for a 'tune up' to 'make them work, silently'.
Personally, I hope it isn't too serious, he comes through it fine,
but with a heart turning empathy, and desire to do justice, for,
the countless suffering victims of The 'Medical & Health' Industry.
Phillip Hudson
CONTROVERSIAL Labor MP Craig Thomson
has been given leave from Parliament
because of potential appendicitis.
CONTROVERSIAL Federal Labor MP Craig Thomson
has been taken to Canberra Hospital with stomach pains
and given leave from Parliament today.
Mr Thomson's office told the Herald Sun
the MP had "pains in his stomach yesterday
and they got worse overnight".
He went to hospital this morning and
is having tests.
Government Whip Joel Fitzgibbon said Mr Thomson has been granted a parliamentary
"pair'' which means Labor will not be down a vote because of the absence. This is a common procedure.
Mr Fitzgibbon put a message on Twitter saying Mr Thomson may have appendicitis.
"Looks like Craig Thomson has appendicitis. May have to come out but he's fine.''
Mr Thomson is at the centre of allegations - which he denies - that he
misused a union credit card to pay for prostitutes in his former role as
national secretary of the Health Services Union.
The allegations are being investigated by Fair Work Australia.
Victoria and NSW police are also examining it.
_____________
One wonders if he's more, or less safe, among 'his old comrades',
that he's brought to the very negative attention of the nation with
so many people on years long waiting lists for tests and treatment
of painful and life threatening illness.
Sunday? Monday? Tuesday? Wednesday, he goes in?
Could it be that he to, wonders how safe it is for him
to trust 'his old comrades' to 'assess' and 'treat' him.
"He got I think some stomach pains, some abdominal pains, yesterday,"
the spokesman said.
"I think it’s really been since the beginning of the week."
Mr Thomson's spokesman said
the MP was "just being checked up at the moment".
"At this stage he's there still being assessed."
"Looks like Craig Thomson has appendicitis,"
he wrote on the social networking site.
"(It) may have to come out but he's fine."
Prime Minister Julia Gillard said
Mr Thomson will likely be back at work in "a day or two".
Gee, wonder if he'll be lucky, and this is one time Gillard hasn't lied.
After all, "still being assessed" for "likely appendicitis",
then booking surgery (cancelling someone else's?),
fasting and preparation for surgery, surgery, recovery from surgery...
that alone, should, take, 'a day or two', plus...
that's an awful lot of opportunity for 'something to go wrong',
but JuLIAR 'says' he'll "likely be back at work, in a day or two"...
but then again, a day or two at the hands of medicos,
is all a faithless body needs, for a 'tune up' to 'make them work, silently'.
Personally, I hope it isn't too serious, he comes through it fine,
but with a heart turning empathy, and desire to do justice, for,
the countless suffering victims of The 'Medical & Health' Industry.
Last edited by true lilly on Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:06 am; edited 1 time in total
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Re: And Labor still thinks Rudd is the bigger scandal
true lilly Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:50 pm
'They know where these guns are'
3:48PM
THREE men accused of running a gun-smuggling ring
from a suburban post office
may know where 150 pistols are being held.
3:48PMTHREE men accused of running a gun-smuggling ring
from a suburban post office
may know where 150 pistols are being held.
- Sting: Hundreds of guns still on the street
true lilly- Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 63
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
Page 5 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar topics» New kid turdwave thinks we should all be mods do you agree?
» psst...palomino is Well educated, and Thinks for themself
» Is there another DIF scandal?...why the bannings?
» Phone Hacking Scandal...!!!
» German president quits in scandal
» psst...palomino is Well educated, and Thinks for themself
» Is there another DIF scandal?...why the bannings?
» Phone Hacking Scandal...!!!
» German president quits in scandal
Page 5 of 7
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum