Sodlike Productions
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

4 posters

Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:03 pm

...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.
true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:12 am

true lilly wrote:...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? 324574
Little is known about Gustavo 'Gus' Fring, other than that he is a
prominent business owner that lives in the Albuquerque, NM area. He is
the owner (or acts as the owner) of a restaurant chain named Los Pollos
Hermanos, which inferred by the name serves a variety of chicken dishes.
He is also in charge of an industrial laundromat, and both businesses
are used as a cover for the manufacturing and trade of illegal drugs
(methamphetamine). He is a very calculating man, and will do what is
necessary to accomplish his tasks he sets for himself and for his
business.

Other Facts:

His origin is unknown, though it has been stated he is from somewhere in South America.

He has direct ties to local (Albuquerque DEA) and possibly international law enforcement and/or military.

Los Pollos Hermanos and the industrial laundromat are subsidiaries of a German company, Madrigal Electromotive, GmbH.


Madrigals originated in Italy during the 1520s.
A madrigal is a secular vocal music composition.

Kungliga Hovkapellet (Swedish: the Royal Court Orchestra), is a Swedish orchestra and was located at the Royal Court in Sweden's capital Stockholm. It was first recorded in 1526. Since 1773, when the Royal Swedish Opera was founded by Gustav III of Sweden, the Kungliga Hovkapellet has been part of the opera's company.

Philippe de Monte, Flemish composer of Italian madrigals (died 1603)
Monte was a hugely prolific composer,[18] and wrote both sacred and secular music,[19] primarily printed in the German language.[20] He wrote about 40 masses and about 260 other sacred pieces, including motets and madrigali spirituali (works differing only from madrigals in that they have sacred texts).

Madrigal de las Altas Torres, a municipality in Ávila, Castile and León, Spain
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? 338px-Escudo_de_la_provincia_de_%C3%81vila.svg

Estadio El Madrigal, a stadium in Villarreal, Spain
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? 220px-El_madrigal_2
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Madrigal

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5nbv0Wy1qdrcyyo1_250Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5nbv0Wy1qdrcyyo2_250
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5nbv0Wy1qdrcyyo3_500

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5759ca21qdrcyyo1_250Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5759ca21qdrcyyo2_250Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5759ca21qdrcyyo3_250
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Tumblr_lre5759ca21qdrcyyo4_500

One of the most epic Breaking Bad's scene.
From Episode 13 "Face Off"
(finale episode) Season 4.

https://youtu.be/R6CjCEyAJ2s

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Gustavo-Fring-death-scene
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Gustavo-Fring-death-scene5
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Gustavo-Fring-death-scene3
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Gustavo-Fring-death-scene2
Breaking Bad Season Finale (Spoilers)
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? AZzmmMwnvXIJ
In These Times - 15 hours ago
Season 4 is a battle of wits between
Walter White and Gus Fring
for the soul of Jesse Pinkman.
Jesse is the only person, besides Walt,
who knows how to cook ...
Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Episode-7-jesse-pinkman-gus-fring
true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:22 am

true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  mugglez Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:37 am

so?....................................................meth/heroin/coke/crack are evil..............................you're part of the problem or part of the solution, what part of that equation don't you understand? popcorn


A Kabbalistic View
of the Use of Drugs
By Rabbi Ariel Bar Tzadok.


http://koshertorah.com/PDF/Drug%20Use.pdf

Throughout the ages, many spiritual traditions, in their alleged zeal to experience the
spiritual realms have turned to the usage of mind/body altering chemicals. The decision
to follow this path is usually based on a desire to experience what is beyond the
conscious mind. The hope of the practitioners of this path is that in the induced, altered
state of consciousness they will be afforded a closer look into the spiritual world, and or
receive "powers" that could be used for, what we must define as, questionable
purposes.
While Kabbalah transverses many levels of altered states of consciousness, there is
never any reference to using any external chemical in order to achieve the prophetic
state. The prophetic state experienced by the prophet was achieved only after long
arduous training in the spiritual disciplines of prophetic Kabbalah. The results were
always ecstatic, but never intoxicating, nor hallucinogenic.
In Biblical times, the priests, who served in the Holy of Holies before the Divine
Presence, were forbidden to partake of anything could hinder their mental faculties, at
the time of their service.
In the Bible (Lev. 10:1-2), the story is told of Nadav, and Avihu, the two sons of the High
Priest Aharon, who when offering the ketoret incense before G-d, were said to have
offered "strange fire". Consequently, fire came forth from G-d, and they were both
burned alive in the presence of G-d. G-d then commands (v. 8-11) that the priests must
never enter their service intoxicated, (it is taught that the "strange fire", was a foreign
element within their bodies that defiled them before G-d's Presence). This abstinence is
an eternal commandment, for all times. The priests are told that this is a separation
between the sacred and the profane, the pure and the unclean. While the specific
reference is to alcohol use, it is obviously applicable to anything else that might interfere
2
with the priest's ability to properly do his job. Whosoever would enter the presence of
G-d without full faculties is condemned to death, a penalty that G-d, Himself will carry
out.
Prophetic ecstasy was thus never a state induced by some external means. True
prophetic ecstasy is one of spiritual/psychological origin. This state, however, was
achieved only after long practices of stringent disciplines geared at successfully
educating the conscious mind how to correctly separate from the limitations of the
senses of the physical body. There could be no short cuts here. This had to be
accomplished in a very precise way to avoid the dangers of such separation, which
could be severe psychosis, or death.
This was the experience, recorded in the Talmud, Hagigah 14B, of the four men, who
entered the "Pardes". One looked around and went insane, one looked around and
apostates, one looked around and died. Only one entered and exited, in peace. If any
type of external chemical was introduced into the body of the aspirant during these
trials, even for the purpose of drawing closer to G-d, like Nadav and Avihu, one might
get a little too close, and not being properly aligned, be burnt up, alive.
Within my experience in Kabbalistic circles, I have known my Rabbis specifically to not
initiate anyone who has a history of hallucinogenic drug use. I was told, and have seen
with my own eyes, that when one approaches the true spiritual courts wherein which
G-d resides, one must be both, physically and psychologically grounded in the objective
reality of that experience. One misconception caused by a malfunction of brain
chemistry (brought on by drug use or abuse) can be the cause of devastating
psychological and spiritual problems.
In order to understand why the Torah of the Kabbalah is so adamant in the rejection of
consciousness altering chemicals, some introductory knowledge regarding true Jewish
Kabbalistic initiation is necessary. To begin with, Kabbalistic training is progressive.
Like the priesthood in the ancient Temple, training develops in stages. It must be
remembered that in Kabbalah, there are many avenues and levels of practice. Each
one of these levels is learned, mastered, tested, and only then practiced.
In the Mishna (Hagigah Ch. 2), the schools of Kabbalistic study are divided into three
sections of learning. First, there is the sitrei arayot (secrets of forbidden relationships),
generally; this is the study of the olamot, and the sefirot. These are the cosmic laws of
Torah and nature. Second, there is the Ma'aseh Bereshit (secrets of creation) which
deals with the manipulations of these cosmic laws of nature, through the manipulation of
the building blocks of creation, the letters of the Hebrew Aleph-bet. The third school,
considered to be the purest and most profound teachings of the Kabbalah, is Ma'aseh
Merkava (the work of the chariot). Ma'aseh Merkava is the experience of G-d's
presence, the purpose of which is for the reception of Divine inspiration and prophecy.
This was the level where Nadav and Avihu stood.
3
In order to see how chemical usage can sabotage this progression of learning, we must
understand some more Kabbalistic basics. The Ba’al Shem Tov teaches (Ekev 35), that
the physical body is created in the image of, and correlates to the spiritual body. The
spiritual body is, of course, created in the image of, and correlates to the ten supernal
sefirot of Atzilut (Zoh. III, 73A). It is not the physical body that experiences G-d directly,
but rather the spiritual body.
The spiritual body, the source of the physical body, experiences G-d directly, and this
experience reverberates all the way down the line to the physical body and
consciousness. (The spiritual body being spoken of here is not the astral body referred
to in western mystical literature. The astral body, according to the Kabbalah (Zoh. II,
162B) is nothing other than that level of the physical body, which is made up of a higher
form of matter.) If the Kabbalist wishes to affect something in one's physical body, (as
in the case of healing) he is taught to go to the source of the problem, in the spiritual
body, i.e. the Neshama (Sefer Ba’al Shem Tov, Ekev, 2,7).
The Neshama congeals its interacting powers into a form that leads to the manifestation
of the physical human body. Therefore, the body is the outward expression of the
Neshama soul. At the same time, the Neshama of a person is a vessel for the holy
yehida, which is the spark of holiness and the connection between the human soul, and
G-d. It is called nishmata d’nishmata, the soul of the soul, in the language of the Zohar
(II, 118B).
The body is thus the vehicle for the Neshama, as the Neshama is the vehicle of the
yehida, which is the vehicle of the Shekhina. (Remember, vehicle in Hebrew, is
Merkava). Therefore, whatever affects one has an affect on all the others. Any
unnatural alteration of the body chemistry has a correlative effect upon the astral
chemistry. What happens in the body, both physical and astral affect one another. The
Neshama and what it contains can therefore be hindered from correctly manifesting its
light in the body.
The astral, spiritual and sefirotic plans all have objective reality to them, as does our
physical plane. One can artificially alter all the consciousness that one perceives. Yet,
the experiences therein are nothing but subjective, and thus only a shadowy reflections
of the truth. For example, if when in an altered state of consciousness, you decide to
stand in front of a speeding train, thinking yourself to be Superman, you will very quickly
realize that you are not.
Many people experimenting with mind-altering drugs feel themselves to be spiritual
supermen. They believe that they can side step the long, ardent details of spiritual
discipline. What they do not know is that what they are experiencing is not an objective
reality, but a subjective one. Such subjective truths are of no concern for the Kabbalist,
for such immature experiences are nothing but klipah (the glow that surrounds the true
light). Bluntly put, such experiences are lies..
4
It is of interest to note that in his work, "Meditation and the Kabbalah", (Pg. 156) Rabbi
Aryeh Kaplan z’l refers to some esevim, (grasses) mentioned in the "Shoshana Yesod
Olam", a text on magical Kabbalah. He offers a possible interpretation that these
"grasses" refer to psychedelic drugs. Yet, there doesn't seem to be any Kabbalistic
authority who mentions esevim in this context. Esevim are widely spoken about in
Kabbalistic literature.
The Holy Zohar says that, "There is no grass or herb that grows in which G-d's wisdom
is not greatly manifested and which cannot exert great influence in heaven" and "If men
but knew the wisdom of all the Holy One, blessed be He, has planted in the earth, and
the power of all that is to be found in the world, they would proclaim the power of their Lrd
in His great wisdom" (Zoh. II, 80B). Yet, the best definition that can be ascribed to
the word Esevim is not "grasses", which is its literal interpretation, but rather medicinal
herbs.
Two texts on practical Kabbalah, Mareh Yeledim, and Abiyah Hidut, both have long
sections on Esevim. Together, both books cover over 100 different herbs and their
medicinal usage. Within all this, there is never mentioned, even one hint, to the usage
of any esev in a way, or for the purpose of altering consciousness, or drawing closer to
the spiritual world, or G-d.
In ancient Israel, the prophets, who were the masters of spiritual discipline were also
masters in herbal arts and healing. The use of herbs and natural healing was
widespread in Biblical times. The Talmud relates that in the days of King Hezekiah, the
Sefer Refuot, the Book of Healing had to be concealed because everyone was being
healed of everything and no one was dying.
The Zohar (II, 80B) says, "The Holy One has purposely hidden this wisdom from men
that they should not turn from His way by trusting in that wisdom alone, forgetting Him".
While much of this story might be legend, it does reveal, nonetheless, the existence of
the knowledge of an ancient Jewish knowledge of body chemistry.
The sectarian group known as the Essenes were also natural healers. According to
Encyclopedia Judaica (Vol. 6, pg. 900, in the name of G. Vermes), the word "Essene"
come from the Aramaic root "esen" which means to heal. Therefore, the title "Essenes"
means, "the healers". This would fit in with our historical knowledge of them from Philo,
and Josephus. Being they knew so much about medicinal herbs and medicines, maybe
they also knew of mind-altering chemicals. Yet, in whatever literature we have
regarding them, there is never any mention of any type of chemical usage for altering
consciousness.
I believe I can offer an answer as to why drug use might be a spiritual temptation.
Remember that the three levels of Kabbalistic learning are progressive. First, one is to
learn the outline of the prophetic universe, which are the sitrei arayot. One then
proceeds to learn the secrets of creation, Ma'aseh Bereshit. Only then can one proceed
and learn the secrets and source of Self, Ma'aseh Merkava, which is the pinnacle and
5
ultimate acquisition of wisdom. Ma'aseh Merkava is not an easy path to walk. It
requires full devotion to ultimate truth, including the recognition, and rectification of the
dark side of the human self. This last step is one most do not succeed in achieving. In
order to make up for this loss of experience, many choose instead to receive a
substitute. This substitute is the personal subjective experience one receives from the
powers of the klipot. It is a shadow of the real thing but it is false.
Many learn the powers of Ma'aseh Bereshit, and abuse them as simple magic. It must
be remembered that manipulation of the laws of nature, which is all that any magic (or
Ma'aseh Bereshit) really is, is not a sign of any spiritual advancement. Magic is a
science like any other technology. Mental magic, alternate states of consciousness
follow the same biological/spiritual pattern. It is only impressive to the simple minded
who cannot understand things in their true depths.
As there are no shortcuts in physical bodybuilding, so there are no shortcuts with
spiritual soul building. Hallucinogenic chemicals are like spiritual steroids. In the short
run, they appear to bring results. Yet, in reality all they do is destroy the souls ability to
properly receive G-d's power through the biological channels that correlate to their
spiritual counterparts. What is left is a handicapped spiritual condition. One who is in
this condition still hungers for the true taste of spiritual nourishment, yet is unable to
receive it, due to the inability of his body to receive the light.
In such cases, out of desperation, many choose to receive from the dark side, rather
than not receive at all. Of course, what is received is not real. Yet, a filling illusion is
sometimes considered more desirable than an empty reality.
This is the result of those paths that do not properly channel G-d's light. They cause
themselves harm, and add insult to injury by drifting farther from the truth, instead of
rectifying the wrong.
According to the Torah, drug use for the purpose of spiritual gain is condemned. There
is no place for it.

personally, I watched the first two episodes then shitcanned it, the teachers 'justification' for his activities is: BOGUS.........depressing, immoral, violent, bullshit............right up your alley....... thumbs up

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/practices/Ethics/Our_Bodies/Health_and_Healing/Smoking_Alcohol_and_Drugs.shtml

A Necessary Evil: The Yetzer ha-Ra

http://ejmmm2007.blogspot.com/2006/12/necessary-evil-yetzer-ha-ra.html

mugglez
mugglez

Posts : 503
Join date : 2011-07-03
Location : Afwhereistan

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:30 pm

true lilly wrote:...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.

Gus was like a smart, non-spamming, non-Oz-obsessed version of you. They didn't firebomb his car either.
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:00 pm

Interesting; with all the statements you mob love to make about the character of real people,
declaring bald faced lies to be fact, and with all your claims to understanding what is and isn't
conspiracy, and how the hidden side of how the world is run, functions, none of you dare give an opinion on the very carefully drawn, very important character of 'Gustavo Fring'.

So, why can't "you" debate a fictional character's character?
Is it all just too deep for such shallow people to begin to contemplate?
Or the fact that the world is full of people that Gus's character is based on,
rightly, scares the shitter out of "you".

P.S. "spam" is what "YOU" do under all "your" fake I.D.s,
all over the world wide web.
true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:45 pm

I have one Internet name, "Ciggy".

Spam is reposting the same irrelevant news article 666 times across every active thread.

I enjoy watching well-written fiction like Breaking Bad. And that's what it's for, to be enjoyed, not "debated".

And nobody bombed your fucking car.

Some Gus, for your viewing pleasure:
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:47 am

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? African-lion-attacks-more-occur-after-full-moon
true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:58 am

Moar:
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  true lilly Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:53 am

BTW, I vote, "Good Guy". Wink
true lilly
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 62
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:56 am

He was a drug dealer and a murderer, Lilly. Your morals are as out of whack as your mind.
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Billy Ruben Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:08 am

Ciggy wrote:
true lilly wrote:...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.

Gus was like a smart, non-spamming, non-Oz-obsessed version of you. They didn't firebomb his car either.

Was a car bombing/fire part of the storyline?Just establishing the real motive behind the threads...Ta.
Billy Ruben
Billy Ruben

Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:34 pm

Billy Ruben wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
true lilly wrote:...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.

Gus was like a smart, non-spamming, non-Oz-obsessed version of you. They didn't firebomb his car either.

Was a car bombing/fire part of the storyline?Just establishing the real motive behind the threads...Ta.

In the show Walt plants a bomb in Gus' car but Gus suspected it and didn't get in. So Walt rigs the old man's wheelchair with the bomb instead and sells it to the old man as a chance for revenge, and he takes it.
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Billy Ruben Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:09 pm

Ciggy wrote:
Billy Ruben wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
true lilly wrote:...there's a debate in this house...funny though, we agree,
Walt was inherently bad, and Jessie was inherently good,
but as to Gustavo Fring, opinion varies; from Devil to God,
and all mortals between.

Hope some here may be able to add some debate ending points.

Gus was like a smart, non-spamming, non-Oz-obsessed version of you. They didn't firebomb his car either.

Was a car bombing/fire part of the storyline?Just establishing the real motive behind the threads...Ta.

In the show Walt plants a bomb in Gus' car but Gus suspected it and didn't get in. So Walt rigs the old man's wheelchair with the bomb instead and sells it to the old man as a chance for revenge, and he takes it.

It'd be interesting to see a wheelchair in the stratos-sphere...good switcheroo
Billy Ruben
Billy Ruben

Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:18 pm

The old man, Hector Salamanca, was a rival drug dealer. Gus killed all his sons.
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Billy Ruben Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:30 pm

Ciggy wrote:The old man, Hector Salamanca, was a rival drug dealer. Gus killed all his sons.

I won't be downloading it...Geeky humour and sci-fi.
Billy Ruben
Billy Ruben

Posts : 8077
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  mugglez Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:31 pm

Ciggy wrote:He was a drug dealer and a murderer, Lilly. Your morals are as out of whack as your mind.

Ahoy!!! Bilgerat!!! I agree.............but you still have much in common with the fuktard from down under........... thumbs up
mugglez
mugglez

Posts : 503
Join date : 2011-07-03
Location : Afwhereistan

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Ciggy Mon Oct 17, 2011 7:41 pm

le sabrage wrote:
Ciggy wrote:He was a drug dealer and a murderer, Lilly. Your morals are as out of whack as your mind.

Ahoy!!! Bilgerat!!! I agree.............but you still have much in common with the fuktard from down under........... thumbs up

You and she are two spammer peas of a pod. You think repetitive walls of text prove points. They don't. Neither you nor Lilly get that.

cheese
Ciggy
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

Back to top Go down

Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy? Empty Re: Breaking Bad: Was Gus a Good Guy?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum