...and then there are those, just begging to be hated, with a Perfect Hatered...and Proud of it...

ninny wrote:
31-08-2011, 11:17 AM #30555

Originally Posted by dixie d I'm just wondering if there is any link from The Best Is Yet to Come (song)

maybe...

'I promise you... The best is yet to come' but it never did... only if he hoaxed his death...

video


Last edited by ninny; 31-08-2011 at 11:22 AM.

dixie d wrote: 31-08-2011, 04:56 AM #30549


I'm just wondering if there is any link from The Best Is Yet to Come (song)

Quote:

"The Best Is Yet to Come" is a song composed by Cy Coleman, with lyrics by Carolyn Leigh. It is particularly associated with Frank Sinatra, who recorded it on his 1964 album It Might As Well Be Swing, accompanied by Count Basie, under the direction of Quincy Jones.

Quote:

He was born Seymour Kaufman on June 14, 1929, in New York City to Eastern European Jewish parents, and was raised in the Bronx.

And Colemans Mustard


An old Colman's advert at the Buckinghamshire Railway Centre.

Quote:

From 1855 the firm introduced its distinctive yellow packaging and bull's head logo, and in 1866 was granted the Royal Warrant as manufacturers of mustard to Queen Victoria.[1] Her Majesty’s household still uses Colman’s today.

Last edited by dixie d; 31-08-2011 at 05:11 AM.

Who is online?

In total there are 14 users online :
: 1 Registered, 2 Hidden and 11 Guests :
: 2 Bots
Most users ever online was 267
on Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:34 pm

Registered Users: true lilly

true lilly wrote:...as I was saying...

September 01, 2011
7:28PM

Bomb hoax closes city loop


7:28PM
Angus Thompson
UPDATE 7.45pm:
CITY loop train services have resumed
following a bomb hoax
that caused the evacuation
of Parliament Station.

• Metro:
  Check to see if your line is disrupted
  
  

Metro Trains shut down peak-hour services
in the CBD at 7.25pm
after
someone phoned police
alleging a bomb was planted at Parliament Station.

But the caller phoned soon after
to say it was a hoax.

The transport chaos
followed disruptions on the Upfield line
when trains were delayed for up to 30 minutes
after paramedics were called
to attend a sick passenger at Moreland.

Trains from Flinders St to Box Hill
were also delayed for up to 15 minutes.


...The "WAY" it is written,
this News does seem,
as "BIG" as it is "small"...

true lilly wrote:...growing...

We have 177 registered users

...but now...

Who is online?
In total there are 6 users online :
: 1 Registered, 1 Hidden and 4 Guests :
: 1 Bot

...makes me wonder, again...
Road Block, Ambo, Police Cars...

true lilly wrote:Road Block, Ambo, Police Cars...at least 5, outside, on my corner, now...
...is that why my on line attackers have gone so quite...just wondering...

I've had a pain riddled, but lovely day, pottering about with household chores,
playing chasey with the dog, chatting with the cats...heard some commotion
a little while back, but too used to much worse around here, to pay attention...

...interesting though, that those gathered around my yard, have mentioned,
a whack with a shovel...and seem quite entertained...again why I wonder,
where my on line attackers are... as I know their lust for seeing real blood,
spilled, 'tops' 'only' talking about it

And no, it's nothing to do with me. It's a house well known for 'domestics'.

...and again...
SHUT THE HELL UP ABOUT AUSTRALIA!!!
So many 'australian' ICKESTS,
yet so little of OZ News, that effects the world, covered

true lilly wrote:Surely I can't be the only one to notice, that the bigger
and more impacting (on those of other nations as well),
that News, from or about Australia is, the more very old,
'cat up trees' level of 'news', is found in "TODAY'S NEWS"
section of The DAVID ICKE OFFICIAL FORUMS, while, The
Big OZ News, remains totally unmentioned, or if posted
at all, barely read, let alone discussed...unless twisted,
to push, David Ickest Type of Religion's Barrows of Poison.

Could it have anything to do with the fact, that so much
of The OZ Big News, is what I warned to watch for, and
what all my attackers, still INSANELY DENY

Anyway, here's some more, of what 'they' ignore...

'Any offshore detention unlawful'


Matt Johnston, AAP
UPDATE 5pm:
THE High Court's rejection of
the Malaysia swap deal
means any offshore detention
is unlawful, the Greens say.
334 comments on this story

Poll: Is it time for Julia Gillard to resign?

Taxpayers:Failed Malaysia deal to cost millions

Editorial: PM's credibility goes overboard

Phillip Hudson:All at sea without a paddle

Analysis:What the High Court ruling means

'Maggot': Labor MP attacked at carbon protest

A woman shouts at Labor MP Anthony Albanese
during an anti-carbon tax rally
outside his office in Marrickville, Sydney.
Picture: Damian Shaw
The Daily Telegraph

(ah, my long lost youthful days, of working in Marrickville... )

Oh, and please remember, that 'they' decided and actively went all out,
to 'make it about me', only as an excuse to distract from the little covered
but Major, Globe And All It's Peoples Effecting, News, that I found to be
Forewarned of, in God's Book's of Holy Scripture, and asked all others to
also consider, study up on, and WATCH FOR and WARN OF.

And how silly of 'them' to try to 'make a liar of God', by pointing out that
I'm only an imperfect old woman, as I keep doing myself, but while also
giving all thanks and all glory to The Creator, Who Promised to reveal,
things hidden, and give understanding to, even the most lowly of His Faithful.

..............

)
ATTACK

true lilly wrote:Oh, a little detail I left out:

the person targeted by the first car bomb,
is a respectable and respected, Servant of The Court.

But don't worry about us, I also Raised them to abhor vengeance.
It's One of the reasons she is so liked and respected by her peers.

Doing Justice, Protecting the weak, Speaking for the voiceless,
Caring for the fatherless, and other such Christian Values,
such as working to make bad things better, rather that being bitter,
is what drew her to scholarship her way through Law.

ANTISEMITISM AND CHRISTIANITY

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8820.html

Hitler did not achieve most of his political and military goals, but on the Jewish question he succeeded remarkably. If his antisemitic propaganda found resonance, its success can be credited in large measure to the unrelenting anti-Jewish Christian theological discourse that linked Nazi propaganda with the traditions and moral authority of the churches. That link was proclaimed with enthusiasm by Nazi Christians: “In the Nazi treatment of the Jews and its ideological stance, Luther’s intentions, after centuries, are being fulfilled.”13 Antisemitism was the lingua franca of the Nazi era and was employed by church leaders to gain credibility with their own adherents—but also out of sincere antisemitic conviction. Antisemitism was also a tactic in the rhetorical battles among the different Christian factions, with each accusing its opponents of being “Jewish” while positioning itself as the true Nazi believer.14

Already in 1971 the historian Uriel Tal challenged the entrenched view that racist antisemitism is a new phenomenon that repudiates Christianity by arguing that it was actually utterly dependent on Christian anti-Judaism for its success: “it was not the economic crises that brought about this new political, racial and antireligious antisemitism, but completely the reverse, it was precisely the anti-Christian and antireligious ideology of racial antisemitism which hampered the first antisemitic parties in their efforts to utilize the economic crisis for their political development . . . [because] what still attracted the masses was the classical, traditional Christian anti-Judaism, however adapted it may have become to the new economic conditions.”15 Tal demonstrated that Germany’s antisemitic, völkisch movements that arose in the nineteenth century had to abandon their initial anti-Christian stances in order to win supporters for whom Christian anti-Jewish arguments held profound political appeal.16 Even within the so-called “church struggle” between German Christians and the Confessing Church for control of the Protestant church, antisemitism became the glue that united the otherwise warring factions. Similarly, however much Hitler made use of images of messianism, redemption, and other Christian motifs, the most useful and consistent aspect of Christianity for the Nazi movement was its anti-Judaism, just as the single most consistent and persistent feature of Nazism was its antisemitism.

Hitler was well aware of arguments that were central to the Institute: that Jesus was an Aryan, and that Paul, as a Jew, had falsified Jesus’s message, themes he repeatedly mentioned in private conversations, together with rants against the church as a Jewish subversion of the Aryan spirit (though the reliability of his reported private conversations is uncertain). In a diatribe alleged to have occurred in October of 1941, the month Hitler made the decision to murder the Jews,17 Hitler proclaimed that Jesus was not a Jew, but a fighter against Jewry whose message was falsified and exploited by Paul: “St. Paul transformed a local movement of Aryan opposition to Jewry into a super-temporal religion, which postulates the equality of all men . . . [causing] the death of the Roman Empire.”18 His views demonstrate that the German Christian diagnosis of Christianity as tainted by Jewish influence resonated at the highest levels of the Reich, but that its prescribed solution of dejudaization was met with skepticism if not sheer mockery. Was Christianity thoroughly impregnated with Judaism, or could it be dejudaized, as the Institute claimed?

Like the antisemitic parties of the nineteenth century, the Nazi Party could not reject Christianity—not only because it would offend the moral and social sensibilities of Germans, but because the antisemitism of Christianity formed the basis on which the party could appeal to Germans with its racial and nationalist ideology. Nazism’s relationship to Christianity was not one of rejection, nor was it an effort to displace Christianity and become a form of “political religion.” Nazism did not present racial antisemitism as antithetical to Christian theological anti-Judaism; rather, Nazi ideology was a form of supersessionism, a usurpation and colonization of Christian theology, especially its antisemitism, for its own purposes. The theology of the Institute was a similar effort at supersessionism in reverse, taking over elements of Nazi racial ideology to bolster and redefine the Christian message. The result was an uneasy competition between two sides seeking popular support and institutional control, though access to power was, of course, highly asymmetrical.

Thus, while seeking to undermine the political power and moral authority of the churches, Nazism simultaneously appropriated key elements of Christian theology into its own ideology both for purposes of winning adherents used to Christian arguments and also to give its own message a coherence and resonance with the age-old Christian teachings that had shaped European culture. Conversely, German Christians appropriated Nazi rhetoric and symbols into the church to give its Christianity a contemporary resonance. Both the Nazis and the German Christians identified Hitler as Christ’s second coming. That gave Hitler the status of a supernatural being and gave Christ renewed glory as a contemporary figure of enormous political significance. Both were suspicious of the institutional church. Factions within the Nazi Reich and the party saw the church as competition and a potential threat to be ultimately eliminated after the war.19 The German Christians sought control and radical reform of the Protestant church, which they never fully achieved, leading them to bitter complaints and, in some cases, demands for its demolition. Meanwhile, Christianity was not to be banned nor the churches outlawed; rather, as the historian Ernst Piper writes, Nazi strategy was to control the churches and lead to “a steadily advancing process of delegitimization and disassociation, of undermining and repression” that would undercut the church’s moral authority and position of respect.20 In its own supersessionist theology, an amalgam of Nazism and Christianity, with a rejection of church authority and doctrine, an assertion of German supremacy and Jewish degeneracy, and absurd revisions of the Bible, the German Protestant church contributed substantially to the Nazi project of undermining Christianity.

The establishment of the Institute in 1939 and the proliferation of its projects during the war years demonstrates that the antisemitism of the German Christians was not simply rhetorical, but was intended to lend active support to Nazi policies against the Jews—or, at times, to push those policies in more radical directions. Indeed, certain Protestant theologians stood at the forefront in discussions of the so-called Jewish problem; Gerhard Kittel’s notorious speech of May 1933, later published as a pamphlet, has been called the most antisemitic utterance of that year.21 In considering ways to rid Germany of Jews, Kittel proposed not only expulsion and guest status, but extermination (“Ausrottung”), a method he rejected only because it was too difficult to implement. On February 24–25, 1936, a few months after the proclamation of the Nuremberg Laws, but long before Jews were being deported and murdered, a group of theologians, some of whom subsequently became leaders of the Institute, met in Dresden to discuss a merger of the German Christian factions of the state churches of Thuringia and Saxony. During the course of the meeting, Siegfried Leffler, a German Christian leader, official in the Thuringian Ministry of Education, and, by 1939, figurehead of the Institute, stated:

In a Christian life, the heart always has to be disposed toward the Jew, and that’s how it has to be. As a Christian, I can, I must, and I ought always to have or to find a bridge to the Jew in my heart. But as a Christian, I also have to follow the laws of my nation [Volk], which are often presented in a very cruel way, so that again I am brought into the harshest of confl icts with the Jew. Even if I know “thou shalt not kill” is a commandment of God or “thou shalt love the Jew” because he too is a child of the eternal Father, I am able to know as well that I have to kill him, I have to shoot him, and I can only do that if I am permitted to say: Christ.22
What is striking is not only that Leffler spoke of killing Jews as early as February 1936, long before mass murder of the Jews became Nazi policy, but that there was no response to his comments from those attending, neither immediately nor later in the session; the discussion simply continued as if murder of Jews in the name of Christ was a customary topic.23 The aryanization of Jesus into a manly, heroic, fighting spirit reflected among the theologians the “heroic realism” that prevailed in the 1930s within right-wing political thought. That “heroism” meant killing one’s opponent without emotion but in accord with principles of natural law, in defense of one’s own race and at the cost of personal sacrifice.24 Paul Althaus, professor of theology at the University of Erlangen and a noted ethicist, was present at the meeting, but expressed nothing to indicate that he was appalled or disturbed by Leffler’s remarks. The lack of outrage is evidence that ridding Germany of Jews had become an acceptable point of discussion among theologians, even when murder was proposed as a technique of achieving it. The Nuremberg Laws, while perceived by many German Jews as protection from far worse legislation, were viewed as an encouragement by the German Christian movement to take even more radical positions. Legal cases in German courts, brought in the wake of the Nuremberg Laws’ criminalization of sexual relations and marriage between Jews and Aryans, and widely reported in the German press, implicated Jews as sexual predators of Aryans, further encouraging Christian theologians to insist on protecting Christian purity by eradicating Jewishness with even more radical measures.25 The penetration of Christian bodies by Jewish sex reiterated a typical motif of racist rhetoric, the dangers of miscegenation, and reinforced fears that Aryanism was not immutable, but subject to destruction by Jews.26 Antisemites had long insisted that German Aryan women were vulnerable to Jewish predation, and Jesus, whose gentleness and suffering was viewed as effeminate by German Christians, was depicted in one caricature as an Aryan woman on a cross with a lecherous Jewish man in the foreground: the crucifixion as the Jewish rape of Germany. ............................

Billy Ruben wrote:

Billy Ruben wrote:Besides commending those Hooligans for defacing the Arch...I noticed Miss Newsbot,that you dilligently avoided the sexual scandals in our serving Navy and Army personelle.

Yes,we all know you treat women as second rate,just like my mother in law did,denied her own femininity and her tit rotted and dropped off as a sign to change her attitude to loving herself.Did'nt work of course,she grew a beard.

But just letting you know,as an ex-serving reservist,the stories in the papers are true and actually down played,as it is a disgusting mind-set that our military personelle enact on each other.

AND THEREFORE ARE TRAITORS TO MY COUNTRY AND WAY OF LIFE...SUCK MY LEFT TESTICLE WHILE YOU'RE ABOUT IT,CHUMP DOWN ON THIS AND EAT SHIT.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10778347

Sex abuse still rife in armed services
By Greg Ansley 5:30 AM Friday Jan 13, 2012 Email
Print


Expand Australian Defence Minister Stephen Smith said sexual abuse would not be tolerated in the Defence Force. Photo / NZPAAlarming revelations in confidential military reports reveal that the Australian Defence Force is struggling to reduce levels of sexual abuse, bullying and other problems among its troops.

Despite a massive bid to shift the force's culture and seven reports probing almost every aspect of service life after a series of scandals, documents obtained by Channel Seven under freedom of information laws show little appears to have changed.

Most of the incidents were reported after the outrage of last year's Skype scandal, in which a cadet at the elite Australian Defence Force Academy filmed his seduction of a female colleague and broadcast it live to other cadets.

The incidents included in dozens of "hot issues briefs" obtained by Channel Seven ranged from rape and attempted murder to possession of child pornography, sexual assault, the concubinage of teenagers on base and further explicit videotaping.

The greatest number of complaints involved the navy, whose problems peaked with revelations of life on board the supply ship HMAS Success during an Asian deployment in 2009.

Subject to a separate report and pending action, these included inappropriate conduct towards women, workforce bullying, a "tribal culture" on board the ship, drunken and disreputable behaviour ashore, a breakdown in discipline and serious failures of command.

Even after the subsequent outcry, problems continued on board the Success.

The Channel Seven documents said one of its officers had been accused of inappropriate relationships with junior sailors and of filming them in the shower.

Videos of sexual acts with other sailors were also discovered, butdespite a record of similar behaviour the officer was transferred to another ship.

The documents also said that just four days after the first report into the original Success allegations, a sailor on the ship - now facing court martial - allegedly indecently assaulted two others in their cabin.

More serious was the charging of a sailor from the minehunter HMAS Yarra with aggravated sexual assault and strangulation with intent to murder.

In the army, a soldier was charged with rape, deprivation of liberty and assault involving a female civilian, another at the School of Artillery was found in possession of child pornography, and yet another was accused of housing two teenagers, aged 15 and 17, for two weeks in Sydney's Holsworthy barracks.

An air force member was charged with indecently assaulting a minor.

Defence Minister Stephen Smith said yesterday that such behaviour would not be tolerated.

"It is essential that the Defence Force promotes and enforces the highest standards of behaviour in line with modern community expectations and creates an environment where complaints can be aired and appropriately addressed," he said.

Smith already has a welter of disturbing reports to consider, continuing long lists of recommendations from the five inquiries established after the Skype scandal.

Most will be released this month, with the Government's response.