The Secret Mass Grave Of The David Icke Forum...!!!

[Sod-Haus...!!!]

The Secret Mass Grave Of The David Icke Forum...!!!



I See Myself,
Vera Susa,
Snoops,
Dove Of Numbness As Harx Bullar,
And Masonicboomering On That List...

[Billy Ruben]

Steevo,banned??? He just come back from inactive.Biblegirl,Pumma...good people,she should've been mod years ago,Biblegirl.I remember Limelady saying no-one is in-expendable,as she found years later,but to lose good people,then the energy will be black,and many little trolls will have fun.

Steevo,banned,shiiiiit man,he was a popular dude,sensible,mostly.Many friends have said,it's not the same since I left,no,nothing to do with me,....the place changed,in alot of ways,they fucked themselves up,management,they did alot of things to counter arguements like this place and Infinite Love have been saying for years,should've tended their own flocks,than worrying about scattered wolf packs.

It's like Tiswas talking about Infidelyork,being a anti - Icke mod,no,he just does'nt agree with it,but no-one realises LookFar,doesn't go with the Reptoid "Theory",either...But she's pretty sweet,hell good looking (for a blonde) English girl.

That's where you guys make the mistakes,thinking it's all Icke worship,it isn't,the last person that wants worship,is Icke...he's going to get it anyway,New Age Groupies,looking for the next messianic figure to lead them over the rainbow...Poor bastard,envy him not...

[true lilly]

David Icke's Official Forums
Today's News

The NEWS behind the NEWS.
tintin
Last Page 3142
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3142

6-10-2011
5:30PM
in Victoria Oz
19,202,791 Views

7-10-2011
10:30AM
in Victoria Oz
19,212,074 Views

Last Page 3146
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3146
9-10-2011
09:00 AM
Victoria OZ
19,236,143 Views

Even with 'tintin' back,
gone are the days of 50,000 views a day.

Last Page 3146
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3146
9-10-2011
08:10 PM
Victoria OZ
19,243,911 Views

...and The TIMING...always The TIMING...

U.K. - Wiki Whacked
Play video

It launched with massive fanfare and a radical agenda to
change the way news was reported. It offered anonymity to whistleblowers
and a platform to freely publish information to a global audience.
WikiLeaks was an instant sensation as it exposed the hidden deeds of
governments and corporations. But now its controversial founder Julian
Assange finds himself isolated - deserted by many of his former partners
and friends and fighting extradition. His organisation is damaged and
can’t currently receive the leaks that are its lifeblood. Can WikiLeaks
survive?

It’s the story WikiLeaks doesn’t want you to know about.

Assange awaits decision on extradition to Sweden.

Andrew Fowler - who first reported on WikiLeaks and its Australian founder
Julian Assange for Foreign Correspondent last year and went on to write a
definitive account of the cyber-phenomenon - The Most Dangerous Man in the World - goes in search again of the truth behind WikiLeaks’ dramatic, chaotic descent into dysfunction, perhaps even collapse.

He’s tracked down key figures in the launch and spectacular flight of
WikiLeaks and the ascendency of Julian Assange and found shattered
relationships, bitter feuds and the future of the website under a very
dark cloud.

Holed up in his Norfolk bolthole awaiting the result
of his appeal against extradition to Sweden, where he's accused of sex
crimes, Assange denies the whistleblower website he founded is in
crisis.

“There is no problem in the hundreds of relationships
that this organisation has signed partnerships with, on every continent
except Antarctica. None of those have failed. They are all strong.” Julian Assange, WikiLeaks

But the evidence of former friends and partners tells otherwise. Such as
former WikiLeaks deputy, Daniel Domscheit-Berg who walked out with
hundreds of thousands of leaked documents, and has now set up his own
rival organisation.

“He threatened me that he would hunt me
down and kill me if I ever f****d up, and the f*****g up part was
related to endangering any of our sources.”
Daniel Domscheit-Berg, WikiLeaks former deputy

And prominent Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir - formerly one of Assange’s
biggest supporters also accuses Assange of harassment and abuse. The
human rights campaigner worked with him on the release of Collateral
Murder the video that established WikiLeaks as a bold, crusading and
potent new media force.

“It actually did feel a bit abusive to
work in this environment where people were objectified, and only
thought kindly of if they were useful.”
Birgitta Jonsdottir, Icelandic MP and ex WikiLeaks collaborator

Assange still has his supporters, including prominent lawyer Geoffrey Robertson
QC and journalist and filmmaker Iain Overton, who watched from close
quarters as Julian Assange fought with old media forces like The
Guardian and The New York Times.

“If
he is sent (to Sweden and to jail) I think WikiLeaks will limp on for a
while. I doubt they are going to get any major new revelations given to
them and it will
probably just be in a holding pattern until such time as Julian is
released from prison.”
Iain Overton, Bureau of Investigative Journalism
_____________________________________

Transcript

FOWLER:
It’s a two-hour train trip northeast of London, through rolling green
pastures to the English country town of Beccles. This quiet little
community doesn’t toss up a lot of news. The locals still talk of media
megastar Sir David Frost who moved here as a boy more than half a
century ago, but now Beccles is in the spotlight thanks to a blow in
from down under by the name of Julian Assange.

When we arrived he was completing for him the mundane daily task of signing in at the local police station.

“How many days is this Julian?”

JULIAN ASSANGE: “Two hundred… a hundred and sixty eight yeah”.

FOWLER:
The man synonymous with the explosive website WikiLeaks now cuts a
remote, forlorn figure as he heads back to a supporter’s country mansion
where he waits as the wheels of justice turn slowly in his sex crimes
case. Julian Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden where he’s
accused of molesting two women.

JULIAN ASSANGE: [WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief] “I felt that I was basically
turning into Howard Hughes. That I had a very small circle of people here,
a long way away from London in rural England and
that those few people could be trusted”.

FOWLER: If Assange and his legal team fail and the man
dubbed ‘the most dangerous man in the world’ is surrendered to Sweden,
gaol time there could be the least of his worries.

JENNIFER ROBINSON: [Defence Lawyer] “Once Julian is in custody in Sweden to face
domestic prosecution under Swedish law, there is a provision in the US
Sweden treaty which allows for a defendant either facing prosecution or
someone who has been prosecuted and is serving a sentence to be lent to
the US for prosecution”.

GEOFFREY
ROBERTSON QC: [Defence Barrister] “Sweden has been guilty of
extraditing a number of individuals by in fact handing them over without
proper process to the
CIA and they’ve been tortured down the line and there have been findings
against Sweden in human rights courts and of course extradition is
partly a political decision and with an extremely right wing Swedish
Government that owes a lot to America, you have a situation where he’d
be more vulnerable than if, for example, he were returned to his own
country, namely Australia”.

FOWLER: It seems like only yesterday
that we first reported on the organisation threatening to change the
future of information and journalism. WikiLeaks was pumping out secret
after big secret and the people behind it forecast a new global
transparency. As a people’s intelligence agency, it opened the door on a
hidden world. An electronic drop box for whistle blowers whose
identities would remain secret and their secrets made public.

From number 10 Downing Street to the defence department, to MI5, corrupt
governments in Africa and multi nationals dumping toxic chemicals in
third world countries – all were fair game. So too were some of the most
secretive and sensitive corners of government in the United States and
the reaction there was intense. Some very powerful figures want Assange
dead. Prominent conservative Sarah Palin demanded he be hunted down like
the Taliban. Other political heavy weights joined the chorus.

NEWT GINGRICH: Julian Assange is engaged in warfare. Information terrorism
which leads to people getting killed is terrorism and Julian Assange is
engaged in terrorism. He should be treated as an enemy combatant.

US SENATOR MITCH McCONNELL: He’s done enormous damage to our country. I think the man is a hi-tech terrorist.

JOSEPH BIDEN (US Vice President): I would argue that it’s closer to being a hi-tech terrorist.

ASSANGE:
“It’s a pretty big deal right if Joseph Biden says you’re a hi-tech
terrorist and Sarah Palin says that you should be hunted down like Osama
Bin Laden etcetera and others say that you should be garrotted in your
hotel room and a car bomb would take care of the issue and so on and the
threats against even my children, but what you do is you just take
appropriate precautions”.

IAIN
OVERTON: [Bureau of Investigative Journalism] “I think if he’s
extradited the likelihood he’ll be sent down is pretty great because I
think there’s huge amount of political
and international pressure on the judiciary to find against you and then
Swedish laws are pretty harsh when it comes to what he’s been accused
of, and if he is sent down, I think WikiLeaks will limp on for a while. I
doubt they’re going to get any major new revelations given to them and
it will probably just be in a holding pattern until such time as Julian
is released from prison”.

FOWLER:
The Julian Assange we profiled a year or so ago is isolated and without
many of his closest most trustedallies and his truth machine,
WikiLeaks, has serious problems. We’ve
tracked down key figures in
the launch and spectacular flight of WikiLeaks and the ascendancy of
Julian Assange and we found broken relationships, bitter feuds and the
future of the website under a very dark cloud.

ASSANGE: “There is no problem in hundreds of
relationships that this organisation has - signed partnerships with
media organisations on every continent except Antarctica. None of those
have failed. They are all strong, they have all produced tremendous
work”.

FOWLER: “How close a relationship did you have with him?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Do you mean if we kissed or something like that? We were
just friends, but I mothered him. I washed his clothes”.

FOWLER:
Birgitta Jonsdottir is an Icelandic MP, a campaigner for human rights
and open government. She was one of Assange’s closest friends. Now it’s
over. Things got heated when she advised him to stand aside as the
WikiLeaks spokesperson while the sexual molestation allegations played
out.

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: [MP, Iceland] “Yeah it was just one of
these times when you sort of felt that maybe I should have shut up
because there was a lot of anger you know? “

FOWLER: “Like what?”

BIRGITTA
JONSDOTTIR: “Well you know what sort of started to happen throughout
this entire process was that there were many threats. It actually did
feel a bit you know abusive to work in this environment where people
were objectified and only thought kindly of if they were useful”.

FOWLER: “In what way was he abusive towards you?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Just you know by threatening you, you know?”

FOWLER: “In what way?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “I can’t go into details about that”.

FOWLER: “Why not?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: (shakes head)

FOWLER: Jonsdottir and Assange once had grand plans to make Iceland a media haven for free speech. Now they don’t even speak.

ASSANGE:
“Anyone can say whatever they like but Birgitta Jonsdottir’s - although
she did valuable work and I would never detract from the valuable work
that she did - what she thinks is actually not relevant to the
organisation, having been excluded from the organisation she had certain
animosity towards it and towards me.”

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG:
“Julian is a very brilliant person, he’s very intelligent and on the
other hand I think he lacks some social competence”.

FOWLER: Once
a part of an unbreakable WikiLeaks double act, Daniel Domscheit-Berg
played the computer nerd, Julian Assange the charismatic leader. But
here again the close relationship has turned noxious. For Assange it
founded on trust.

ASSANGE: “He’d been excluded from all source
material. It was viewed that he was not trustworthy. We had concerns
about his stability back in January 2010 and as a result he was phased
out of the high security part of what we were doing”.

FOWLER:
Domscheit-Berg believes Assange, the cyber warrior, developed an
over–inflated ego from the glut of global attention and then he turned
on his own.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: [Former WikiLeaks Deputy] “He
threatened me that he would hunt me down and kill me if I ever f****d
up and the f****ing up part was related to endangering any of our
sources and actually that statement came completely out of the blue
because there was no mistake that had happened at that point in time. He
became very paranoid about the way he was dealing with me, dealing with
others as well. It was all about conspiracies, back-stabbing, alleged
backstabbing, alleged conspiracies and that’s just tiresome if you want
to work together”.

FOWLER: Now in Berlin building his own whistle
blower site, Domscheit-Berg has someone WikiLeaks and Assange badly
need. The brains behind the intricate and protective WikiLeaks anonymous
drop box. He’s one of the few in this very public saga who’s kept a lid
on his identity. In the Wiki fraternity he is simply called ‘the
Architect’.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It’s all his creation. Not a
single line of code ever was made by Julian. He has no role in creating
the submission system and neither have I and neither did I or he ever
have access to that system and that person who created it decided to not
provide such a powerful tool to WikiLeaks anymore and he decided to
take it away”.

FOWLER: “What can you tell us about the Architect?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Nothing”.

FOWLER: “Why is that?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “He wants to remain anonymous so I have nothing to say about him”.

FOWLER: “But how can someone remain anonymous in such a transparent area?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “If you want to protect the people that want to be only
working on the content not the politics, you should absolutely honour that”.

FOWLER: “How important is the role of the architect?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “It’s very”.

FOWLER: “In what way?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “He’s a genius”. He’s a genius and you know writing the
stuff that you need to write, the coding, the encryptions to make sure
that people can leak documents without being tracked”.

FOWLER:
The super security of the Wiki website designed and delivered by the
Architect drew an avalanche of super sensitive material. But after
dalliances with self publication, Assange’s strategy shifted into
alliances with some of the world’s biggest and most respected
newspapers. It would not be long before these relationships would also
disintegrate.

The Guardian is a bastion of British journalism,
along with The New York Times, Le Monde and Spain’s El Pais it’s
published sensational stories courtesy of classified information
provided by WikiLeaks. Julian Assange’s relationship with The New York
Times has been difficult for several months now, but his relationship
with The Guardian has turned toxic.

WikiLeaks
and The Guardian had collaborated on a number of big releases and they
were invariably fraught with shifting terms and conditions, but it was a
treasure trove
of documents dubbed “Cablegate” a cache of 251,000
classified State Department files that would bring the biggest
arguments, accusations and recriminations.

ALAN RUSBRIDGER:
[Editor, The Guardian] “Things were getting tense between us because
Julian was at best part in sort ofsemi-detached. It was, communication
was very difficult because I thinkhe felt more and more paranoid about
his own personal position after
the accusations in Sweden so it
wasn’t a sort of simple matter of just lifting the phone and speaking to
him, you had to go through encrypted technologies”.

FOWLER:
Assange wasn’t simply worried about how The Guardian communicated with
him, he was deeply concerned about how the paper’s computers were
vulnerable to hackers.

ASSANGE: “They put all the cables onto internet connected computer systems, completely
breaching their security, opening them up to foreign intelligence
agencies and computer hackers. The first thing we would have known is
when our people in the United States would have been rounded up and
arrested”.

FOWLER: The Cablegate files spilled the beans on
everything from the State Department spying on the United Nations, to
calls by Saudi Arabia for the US to bomb Iran. It was hot stuff and
certainly one of WikiLeaks biggest scoops, but Assange accused The
Guardian of double dealing.

ASSANGE: “They secretly gave all
the cables to the New York Times behind our backs. They secretly set up
the program to publish them without telling us”.

ALAN RUSBRIDGER:
“We had a sort of crisis meeting or a clear the air meeting where Julian
suddenly barged into this building unannounced with lawyers and he got
very angry with us ‘cause he accused us of dealing with the New York
Times where he didn’t want to and the reason he didn’t want to deal with
the New York Times was because the New York Times had published an
unflattering piece about him. So it was all getting very messy and we
had a meeting that went on for about 8 hours. There was lots of jabbing
of fingers and shouting and accusations”.

FOWLER:
It wasn’t just the so-called hit piece that upset Assange, he was angry
that the New York Times failed to carry some of the reports on
America’s illicit activities.

ASSANGE: “The New York Times had been censoring its material, attacking an alleged
source and attacking us as an organisation for its own strategic purposes”.

FOWLER: WikiLeaks alliance with the old media was on the rocks but the fallout from
Cablegate
wouldn’t end there. More damage was on the way, courtesy of a WikiLeaks
underling by the name of Herbert Snorrason. Wide-eyed and enthusiastic
when
he joined, Snorrason soon found himself in the bitter cross-fire between Assange and Domscheit-Berg.

HERBERT SNORRASON: [Former WikiLeaks volunteer] “The most specific disagreement I
had with Julian was that he alleged that Daniel acted maliciously and
that Daniel was after Julian’s job. I requested evidence because I was
sceptical of the claim”.

FOWLER: “Can you tell me the language that he used when he spoke to you?”

HERBERT SNORRASON: “Ah (laughs) yeah there is a quote that circulated quite
widely, ‘I am the heart and soul of this organisation - its founder,
philosopher, original coder’. I really don’t remember the entire
list..... and ending with ‘if you have a problem with me you can piss
off’.”

ASSANGE: “I think I told him very soundly to piss
off. You know we were trying to get on with things and it wasn’t useful
to have an Icelandic student hectoring the CEO of an organisation during
a time of high stress”.

HERBERT SNORRASON: “My immediate reply was so be it. I left and I have not spoken with Julian since”.

FOWLER:
It might have paid Assange to treat Snorrason better. On a flight home
to Iceland, he read a book written by two Guardian reporters Assange had
teamed up, with to produce the Cablegate stories. Incredibly there in
black and white they’d printed a password, confidentially given to them
by Assange to open the encrypted Cablegate files. The files had been
placed on the internet for safe keeping in case anything happened to
Assange.

HERBERT SNORRASON: “My immediate reaction when I noticed the password was, holy crap this isn’t happening”.

FOWLER:
Snorrason drove to his grandparents’ home close to Reykjavik Airport.
If the password opened the cables, all the names of US informants would
be revealed. Snorrason fired up his computer and carefully typed in the
code. Seconds later the Cablegate internet file opened up.

HERBERT
SNORRASON: “I immediately realised that this would be something that
was very dangerous. My main concern was that the release of those
documents could put people’s lives at risk”.

FOWLER: Snorrason contacted his friend Domscheit-Berg in Germany to tell him what he’d found.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “Sharing the password for the master copy was I think a
big mistake and there’s not really any excuse for that other than being lazy”.

FOWLER:
Not far from central Berlin, Der Freitag, a radical newspaper with a
tiny circulation, splashed the story. We can now reveal the principle
source was none other than Daniel
Domscheit-Berg.

“What do
you say to the argument that by talking to Freitag, by pointing them in
the direction of the file and the password, the key, that you made it
likely that that information would be available, unredacted around the
world?”

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It’s just a matter of time until somebody intelligent
would
have put one and one together and anyone putting in resources into
finding these cables because they had an interest in obtaining access to
the cables was probably, has known that for quite some time already”.

FOWLER: “But you helped speed it up”.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “No I don’t.... well I don’t know. You could..... you could allege that I did. I don’t know if I did”.

FOWLER:
That the code printed in the Guardian book was a grave error of
judgement by the authors mattered not a jot. WikiLeaks looked as if its
security was slack. For Daniel Domscheit-Berg it vindicated his stand
against WikiLeaks.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It is important for
the world to understand the general issue at hand because people are
potentially risking their lives trusting in the ability to handle
information
properly. We were not just making this up in order to find an excuse
for sabotaging WikiLeaks or for spreading dirt you know?”

ASSANGE:
“I assume it was probably not malicious the putting of the password in
the book, it was just extremely arrogant and careless. Where there may
be genuine criticism levelled at me and the decision making of the
organisation, is that actually we trusted The Guardian”.

FOWLER:
With the names of spies and informants revealed, Assange decided to
publish the full cables on the WikiLeaks website arguing that everyone
should have access and not those simply in the know, such as corrupt
dictatorships and their intelligence organisations.

ASSANGE:
“Given that the material had already been published, at that stage we
determined that well actually we have to give this to the public, we
have to give this to the journalists, we have to give this to human
rights workers”.

FOWLER: WikiLeaks polarises opinion.
It’s either a force for good or a dangerous enemy of the state.
Whatever the case,
with the Architect gone,
it’s now effectively closed for new business,
unable to take whistle blowers’ electronic submissions.

“When will it be on line again?”

ASSANGE: “Some time… I don’t know”.

FOWLER: “When will you be open to take submissions again, electronic submissions?”

ASSANGE: “I’m not sure…”.

FOWLER: “Will it be one month, two months, six months?”

ASSANGE: “I imagine before the end of the year”.

FOWLER:
But right now Assange has other more important concerns. Here at the
High Court in London the ruling on his extradition to Sweden is
imminent.
At the same time a US Grand Jury is investigating if
there’s sufficient evidence to indict him on charges of spying against
the United States.

GEOFFREY
ROBERTSON: “Under the US Espionage Act there are sections that do carry
the death penalty. For that reason I suspect he wouldn’t be extradited
on those charges but there are lesser charges that carry up to ten years
imprisonment and that is what he
would face, ten years in a maximum security prison”.

FOWLER: No matter what the outcome in the United States, Julian Assange can expect little help from Australia.

JENNIFER ROBINSON: “We had the Australian Prime Minister come out and accuse him
of illegal conduct which was manifestly untrue and was proven as such
by an Australian Federal Police investigation in Australia, so her
comments were both prejudicial and premature. We also had the Attorney
General, Robert McClelland suggesting that they may cancel Julian’s
passport. Now as an Australian living abroad myself, I found that to be a
shocking statement to come from our Government, that the Australian
Government would be so quick to accuse rather than protect an Australian
living abroad and I think that’s of grave concern and one that the
Australian public ought to take up with our politicians”.

ASSANGE: “Well the Prime Minister and the Attorney General are US lackeys. I mean it’s as simple as that”.

IAIN OVERTON: “I really admire the man. I mean he’s getting a huge amount of
flack from all sides but he’s actually by releasing all this
information, he’s created a complete hellhole for his life. He didn’t
have to do it and yet what he’s done is just remarkable”.

FOWLER:
Julian Assange set out to challenge the media and government secrecy.
WikiLeaks has given a penetrating insight into the covert world of war
and politics. Now he and his organisation face their severest test, the
struggle for survival.

[rodin]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

[ruud gullit]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

Thats easy, you push a load of bullshit wraped up as 'twooth'' 24/7..


Post some reall truth and you will gone too..

[true lilly]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

Thats easy, you push a load of bullshit wraped up as 'twooth'' 24/7..

Post some reall truth and you will gone too..

Just like the infamous "They" wouldn't dare
silence this wolf, misleading the sheep,
to their slaughter...

Julian Assange speaking to protesters from
the steps of Saint Paul's Cathedral.
Photograph: Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images
Assange Addresses Occupy London Protesters
3770 related articles
...oh no, we simply can't hear enough
of the lies of the filthy.

MATTHEW 24:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&c=24&v=1&t=KJV#1
Then ⁵¹¹⁹ if ¹⁴³⁷ any man ⁵¹⁰⁰
shall say ²⁰³⁶ unto you ⁵²¹³,
Lo ²⁴⁰⁰ , here ⁵⁶⁰² [is] Christ ⁵⁵⁴⁷,
or ²²²⁸ there ⁵⁶⁰²; believe ⁴¹⁰⁰ [it] not ³³⁶¹.

For ¹⁰⁶³ there shall arise ¹⁴⁵³ false Christs ⁵⁵⁸⁰,
and ²⁵³² false prophets ⁵⁵⁷⁸,
and ²⁵³² shall shew ¹³²⁵ great ³¹⁷³ signs ⁴⁵⁹²
and ²⁵³² wonders ⁵⁰⁵⁹; insomuch that ⁵⁶²⁰,
if ¹⁴⁸⁷ [it were] possible ¹⁴¹⁵,
they shall deceive ⁴¹⁰⁵ the very ²⁵³² elect ¹⁵⁸⁸.

Behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , I have told ^{4280 0} you ⁵²¹³ before ⁴²⁸⁰ .

Wherefore ³⁷⁶⁷ if ¹⁴³⁷ they shall say ²⁰³⁶ unto you ⁵²¹³,
Behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , he is ²⁰⁷⁶ in ¹⁷²² the desert ²⁰⁴⁸;
go ^{1831 0} not ³³⁶¹ forth ¹⁸³¹ :
behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , [he is] in ¹⁷²² the secret chambers ⁵⁰⁰⁹;
believe ⁴¹⁰⁰ [it] not ³³⁶¹.

For ¹⁰⁶³ as ⁵⁶¹⁸ the lightning ⁷⁹⁶ cometh ¹⁸³¹
out of ⁵⁷⁵ the east ³⁹⁵, and ²⁵³² shineth ⁵³¹⁶
even unto ²¹⁹³ the west ¹⁴²⁴;
so ³⁷⁷⁹ shall ^{2071 0} also ²⁵³² the coming ³⁹⁵²
of the Son ⁵²⁰⁷ of man ⁴⁴⁴ be ²⁰⁷¹ .

For ¹⁰⁶³ wheresoever ^{1437 3699}
the carcase ⁴⁴³⁰ is ⁵⁶⁰⁰ ,
there ¹⁵⁶³ will ^{4863 0}
the eagles ¹⁰⁵ be gathered together ⁴⁸⁶³ .

[McKallisti Of The Sods]

The Secret Mass Grave Of The David Icke Forum...!!!

Spaetregen said...

it implys that actually David Icke fans are ignored in this forum. I know lots of these guys.
They never had any bad purpose on this forum.
Include myself, we were banned on speaking of the truth... like posting critics about David's stand on religion or his used hexagram on the original poster of "The Lion sleeps no more".
If you search the net, there are many pissed of users who genereally supported Icke and were blamed.
search words in google: sodlike productions, David Icke debunked and so on.
You'll find plenty of stuff.
Especially gorilla199 youtube user who catched David sitting on a grandmaster chair, which is not allowed for normal users...

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/79131/The_secret_mass_grave_of_the_David_Icke_forum/

[daddlepoms]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

Thats easy, you push a load of bullshit wraped up as 'twooth'' 24/7..


Post some reall truth and you will gone too..

poor goldy

[daddlepoms]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

Icke has the midas touch

[daddlepoms]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

Thats easy, you push a load of bullshit wraped up as 'twooth'' 24/7..

Post some reall truth and you will gone too..

Just like the infamous "They" wouldn't dare
silence this wolf, misleading the sheep,
to their slaughter...

Julian Assange speaking to protesters from
the steps of Saint Paul's Cathedral.
Photograph: Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images
Assange Addresses Occupy London Protesters
3770 related articles
...oh no, we simply can't hear enough
of the lies of the filthy.

MATTHEW 24:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&c=24&v=1&t=KJV#1
Then ⁵¹¹⁹ if ¹⁴³⁷ any man ⁵¹⁰⁰
shall say ²⁰³⁶ unto you ⁵²¹³,
Lo ²⁴⁰⁰ , here ⁵⁶⁰² [is] Christ ⁵⁵⁴⁷,
or ²²²⁸ there ⁵⁶⁰²; believe ⁴¹⁰⁰ [it] not ³³⁶¹.

For ¹⁰⁶³ there shall arise ¹⁴⁵³ false Christs ⁵⁵⁸⁰,
and ²⁵³² false prophets ⁵⁵⁷⁸,
and ²⁵³² shall shew ¹³²⁵ great ³¹⁷³ signs ⁴⁵⁹²
and ²⁵³² wonders ⁵⁰⁵⁹; insomuch that ⁵⁶²⁰,
if ¹⁴⁸⁷ [it were] possible ¹⁴¹⁵,
they shall deceive ⁴¹⁰⁵ the very ²⁵³² elect ¹⁵⁸⁸.

Behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , I have told ^{4280 0} you ⁵²¹³ before ⁴²⁸⁰ .

Wherefore ³⁷⁶⁷ if ¹⁴³⁷ they shall say ²⁰³⁶ unto you ⁵²¹³,
Behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , he is ²⁰⁷⁶ in ¹⁷²² the desert ²⁰⁴⁸;
go ^{1831 0} not ³³⁶¹ forth ¹⁸³¹ :
behold ²⁴⁰⁰ , [he is] in ¹⁷²² the secret chambers ⁵⁰⁰⁹;
believe ⁴¹⁰⁰ [it] not ³³⁶¹.

For ¹⁰⁶³ as ⁵⁶¹⁸ the lightning ⁷⁹⁶ cometh ¹⁸³¹
out of ⁵⁷⁵ the east ³⁹⁵, and ²⁵³² shineth ⁵³¹⁶
even unto ²¹⁹³ the west ¹⁴²⁴;
so ³⁷⁷⁹ shall ^{2071 0} also ²⁵³² the coming ³⁹⁵²
of the Son ⁵²⁰⁷ of man ⁴⁴⁴ be ²⁰⁷¹ .

For ¹⁰⁶³ wheresoever ^{1437 3699}
the carcase ⁴⁴³⁰ is ⁵⁶⁰⁰ ,
there ¹⁵⁶³ will ^{4863 0}
the eagles ¹⁰⁵ be gathered together ⁴⁸⁶³ .

now if only Israel would worship god instead of a goldberg waiting for the titanic

[daddlepoms]

David Icke's Official Forums
Today's News

The NEWS behind the NEWS.
tintin
Last Page 3142
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3142

6-10-2011
5:30PM
in Victoria Oz
19,202,791 Views

7-10-2011
10:30AM
in Victoria Oz
19,212,074 Views

Last Page 3146
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3146
9-10-2011
09:00 AM
Victoria OZ
19,236,143 Views

Even with 'tintin' back,
gone are the days of 50,000 views a day.

Last Page 3146
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=11956&page=3146
9-10-2011
08:10 PM
Victoria OZ
19,243,911 Views

...and The TIMING...always The TIMING...

U.K. - Wiki Whacked
Play video

It launched with massive fanfare and a radical agenda to
change the way news was reported. It offered anonymity to whistleblowers
and a platform to freely publish information to a global audience.
WikiLeaks was an instant sensation as it exposed the hidden deeds of
governments and corporations. But now its controversial founder Julian
Assange finds himself isolated - deserted by many of his former partners
and friends and fighting extradition. His organisation is damaged and
can’t currently receive the leaks that are its lifeblood. Can WikiLeaks
survive?

It’s the story WikiLeaks doesn’t want you to know about.

Assange awaits decision on extradition to Sweden.

Andrew Fowler - who first reported on WikiLeaks and its Australian founder
Julian Assange for Foreign Correspondent last year and went on to write a
definitive account of the cyber-phenomenon - The Most Dangerous Man in the World - goes in search again of the truth behind WikiLeaks’ dramatic, chaotic descent into dysfunction, perhaps even collapse.

He’s tracked down key figures in the launch and spectacular flight of
WikiLeaks and the ascendency of Julian Assange and found shattered
relationships, bitter feuds and the future of the website under a very
dark cloud.

Holed up in his Norfolk bolthole awaiting the result
of his appeal against extradition to Sweden, where he's accused of sex
crimes, Assange denies the whistleblower website he founded is in
crisis.

“There is no problem in the hundreds of relationships
that this organisation has signed partnerships with, on every continent
except Antarctica. None of those have failed. They are all strong.” Julian Assange, WikiLeaks

But the evidence of former friends and partners tells otherwise. Such as
former WikiLeaks deputy, Daniel Domscheit-Berg who walked out with
hundreds of thousands of leaked documents, and has now set up his own
rival organisation.

“He threatened me that he would hunt me
down and kill me if I ever f****d up, and the f*****g up part was
related to endangering any of our sources.”
Daniel Domscheit-Berg, WikiLeaks former deputy

And prominent Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir - formerly one of Assange’s
biggest supporters also accuses Assange of harassment and abuse. The
human rights campaigner worked with him on the release of Collateral
Murder the video that established WikiLeaks as a bold, crusading and
potent new media force.

“It actually did feel a bit abusive to
work in this environment where people were objectified, and only
thought kindly of if they were useful.”
Birgitta Jonsdottir, Icelandic MP and ex WikiLeaks collaborator

Assange still has his supporters, including prominent lawyer Geoffrey Robertson
QC and journalist and filmmaker Iain Overton, who watched from close
quarters as Julian Assange fought with old media forces like The
Guardian and The New York Times.

“If
he is sent (to Sweden and to jail) I think WikiLeaks will limp on for a
while. I doubt they are going to get any major new revelations given to
them and it will
probably just be in a holding pattern until such time as Julian is
released from prison.”
Iain Overton, Bureau of Investigative Journalism
_____________________________________

Transcript

FOWLER:
It’s a two-hour train trip northeast of London, through rolling green
pastures to the English country town of Beccles. This quiet little
community doesn’t toss up a lot of news. The locals still talk of media
megastar Sir David Frost who moved here as a boy more than half a
century ago, but now Beccles is in the spotlight thanks to a blow in
from down under by the name of Julian Assange.

When we arrived he was completing for him the mundane daily task of signing in at the local police station.

“How many days is this Julian?”

JULIAN ASSANGE: “Two hundred… a hundred and sixty eight yeah”.

FOWLER:
The man synonymous with the explosive website WikiLeaks now cuts a
remote, forlorn figure as he heads back to a supporter’s country mansion
where he waits as the wheels of justice turn slowly in his sex crimes
case. Julian Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden where he’s
accused of molesting two women.

JULIAN ASSANGE: [WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief] “I felt that I was basically
turning into Howard Hughes. That I had a very small circle of people here,
a long way away from London in rural England and
that those few people could be trusted”.

FOWLER: If Assange and his legal team fail and the man
dubbed ‘the most dangerous man in the world’ is surrendered to Sweden,
gaol time there could be the least of his worries.

JENNIFER ROBINSON: [Defence Lawyer] “Once Julian is in custody in Sweden to face
domestic prosecution under Swedish law, there is a provision in the US
Sweden treaty which allows for a defendant either facing prosecution or
someone who has been prosecuted and is serving a sentence to be lent to
the US for prosecution”.

GEOFFREY
ROBERTSON QC: [Defence Barrister] “Sweden has been guilty of
extraditing a number of individuals by in fact handing them over without
proper process to the
CIA and they’ve been tortured down the line and there have been findings
against Sweden in human rights courts and of course extradition is
partly a political decision and with an extremely right wing Swedish
Government that owes a lot to America, you have a situation where he’d
be more vulnerable than if, for example, he were returned to his own
country, namely Australia”.

FOWLER: It seems like only yesterday
that we first reported on the organisation threatening to change the
future of information and journalism. WikiLeaks was pumping out secret
after big secret and the people behind it forecast a new global
transparency. As a people’s intelligence agency, it opened the door on a
hidden world. An electronic drop box for whistle blowers whose
identities would remain secret and their secrets made public.

From number 10 Downing Street to the defence department, to MI5, corrupt
governments in Africa and multi nationals dumping toxic chemicals in
third world countries – all were fair game. So too were some of the most
secretive and sensitive corners of government in the United States and
the reaction there was intense. Some very powerful figures want Assange
dead. Prominent conservative Sarah Palin demanded he be hunted down like
the Taliban. Other political heavy weights joined the chorus.

NEWT GINGRICH: Julian Assange is engaged in warfare. Information terrorism
which leads to people getting killed is terrorism and Julian Assange is
engaged in terrorism. He should be treated as an enemy combatant.

US SENATOR MITCH McCONNELL: He’s done enormous damage to our country. I think the man is a hi-tech terrorist.

JOSEPH BIDEN (US Vice President): I would argue that it’s closer to being a hi-tech terrorist.

ASSANGE:
“It’s a pretty big deal right if Joseph Biden says you’re a hi-tech
terrorist and Sarah Palin says that you should be hunted down like Osama
Bin Laden etcetera and others say that you should be garrotted in your
hotel room and a car bomb would take care of the issue and so on and the
threats against even my children, but what you do is you just take
appropriate precautions”.

IAIN
OVERTON: [Bureau of Investigative Journalism] “I think if he’s
extradited the likelihood he’ll be sent down is pretty great because I
think there’s huge amount of political
and international pressure on the judiciary to find against you and then
Swedish laws are pretty harsh when it comes to what he’s been accused
of, and if he is sent down, I think WikiLeaks will limp on for a while. I
doubt they’re going to get any major new revelations given to them and
it will probably just be in a holding pattern until such time as Julian
is released from prison”.

FOWLER:
The Julian Assange we profiled a year or so ago is isolated and without
many of his closest most trustedallies and his truth machine,
WikiLeaks, has serious problems. We’ve
tracked down key figures in
the launch and spectacular flight of WikiLeaks and the ascendancy of
Julian Assange and we found broken relationships, bitter feuds and the
future of the website under a very dark cloud.

ASSANGE: “There is no problem in hundreds of
relationships that this organisation has - signed partnerships with
media organisations on every continent except Antarctica. None of those
have failed. They are all strong, they have all produced tremendous
work”.

FOWLER: “How close a relationship did you have with him?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Do you mean if we kissed or something like that? We were
just friends, but I mothered him. I washed his clothes”.

FOWLER:
Birgitta Jonsdottir is an Icelandic MP, a campaigner for human rights
and open government. She was one of Assange’s closest friends. Now it’s
over. Things got heated when she advised him to stand aside as the
WikiLeaks spokesperson while the sexual molestation allegations played
out.

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: [MP, Iceland] “Yeah it was just one of
these times when you sort of felt that maybe I should have shut up
because there was a lot of anger you know? “

FOWLER: “Like what?”

BIRGITTA
JONSDOTTIR: “Well you know what sort of started to happen throughout
this entire process was that there were many threats. It actually did
feel a bit you know abusive to work in this environment where people
were objectified and only thought kindly of if they were useful”.

FOWLER: “In what way was he abusive towards you?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Just you know by threatening you, you know?”

FOWLER: “In what way?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “I can’t go into details about that”.

FOWLER: “Why not?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: (shakes head)

FOWLER: Jonsdottir and Assange once had grand plans to make Iceland a media haven for free speech. Now they don’t even speak.

ASSANGE:
“Anyone can say whatever they like but Birgitta Jonsdottir’s - although
she did valuable work and I would never detract from the valuable work
that she did - what she thinks is actually not relevant to the
organisation, having been excluded from the organisation she had certain
animosity towards it and towards me.”

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG:
“Julian is a very brilliant person, he’s very intelligent and on the
other hand I think he lacks some social competence”.

FOWLER: Once
a part of an unbreakable WikiLeaks double act, Daniel Domscheit-Berg
played the computer nerd, Julian Assange the charismatic leader. But
here again the close relationship has turned noxious. For Assange it
founded on trust.

ASSANGE: “He’d been excluded from all source
material. It was viewed that he was not trustworthy. We had concerns
about his stability back in January 2010 and as a result he was phased
out of the high security part of what we were doing”.

FOWLER:
Domscheit-Berg believes Assange, the cyber warrior, developed an
over–inflated ego from the glut of global attention and then he turned
on his own.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: [Former WikiLeaks Deputy] “He
threatened me that he would hunt me down and kill me if I ever f****d
up and the f****ing up part was related to endangering any of our
sources and actually that statement came completely out of the blue
because there was no mistake that had happened at that point in time. He
became very paranoid about the way he was dealing with me, dealing with
others as well. It was all about conspiracies, back-stabbing, alleged
backstabbing, alleged conspiracies and that’s just tiresome if you want
to work together”.

FOWLER: Now in Berlin building his own whistle
blower site, Domscheit-Berg has someone WikiLeaks and Assange badly
need. The brains behind the intricate and protective WikiLeaks anonymous
drop box. He’s one of the few in this very public saga who’s kept a lid
on his identity. In the Wiki fraternity he is simply called ‘the
Architect’.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It’s all his creation. Not a
single line of code ever was made by Julian. He has no role in creating
the submission system and neither have I and neither did I or he ever
have access to that system and that person who created it decided to not
provide such a powerful tool to WikiLeaks anymore and he decided to
take it away”.

FOWLER: “What can you tell us about the Architect?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “Nothing”.

FOWLER: “Why is that?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “He wants to remain anonymous so I have nothing to say about him”.

FOWLER: “But how can someone remain anonymous in such a transparent area?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “If you want to protect the people that want to be only
working on the content not the politics, you should absolutely honour that”.

FOWLER: “How important is the role of the architect?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “It’s very”.

FOWLER: “In what way?”

BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR: “He’s a genius”. He’s a genius and you know writing the
stuff that you need to write, the coding, the encryptions to make sure
that people can leak documents without being tracked”.

FOWLER:
The super security of the Wiki website designed and delivered by the
Architect drew an avalanche of super sensitive material. But after
dalliances with self publication, Assange’s strategy shifted into
alliances with some of the world’s biggest and most respected
newspapers. It would not be long before these relationships would also
disintegrate.

The Guardian is a bastion of British journalism,
along with The New York Times, Le Monde and Spain’s El Pais it’s
published sensational stories courtesy of classified information
provided by WikiLeaks. Julian Assange’s relationship with The New York
Times has been difficult for several months now, but his relationship
with The Guardian has turned toxic.

WikiLeaks
and The Guardian had collaborated on a number of big releases and they
were invariably fraught with shifting terms and conditions, but it was a
treasure trove
of documents dubbed “Cablegate” a cache of 251,000
classified State Department files that would bring the biggest
arguments, accusations and recriminations.

ALAN RUSBRIDGER:
[Editor, The Guardian] “Things were getting tense between us because
Julian was at best part in sort ofsemi-detached. It was, communication
was very difficult because I thinkhe felt more and more paranoid about
his own personal position after
the accusations in Sweden so it
wasn’t a sort of simple matter of just lifting the phone and speaking to
him, you had to go through encrypted technologies”.

FOWLER:
Assange wasn’t simply worried about how The Guardian communicated with
him, he was deeply concerned about how the paper’s computers were
vulnerable to hackers.

ASSANGE: “They put all the cables onto internet connected computer systems, completely
breaching their security, opening them up to foreign intelligence
agencies and computer hackers. The first thing we would have known is
when our people in the United States would have been rounded up and
arrested”.

FOWLER: The Cablegate files spilled the beans on
everything from the State Department spying on the United Nations, to
calls by Saudi Arabia for the US to bomb Iran. It was hot stuff and
certainly one of WikiLeaks biggest scoops, but Assange accused The
Guardian of double dealing.

ASSANGE: “They secretly gave all
the cables to the New York Times behind our backs. They secretly set up
the program to publish them without telling us”.

ALAN RUSBRIDGER:
“We had a sort of crisis meeting or a clear the air meeting where Julian
suddenly barged into this building unannounced with lawyers and he got
very angry with us ‘cause he accused us of dealing with the New York
Times where he didn’t want to and the reason he didn’t want to deal with
the New York Times was because the New York Times had published an
unflattering piece about him. So it was all getting very messy and we
had a meeting that went on for about 8 hours. There was lots of jabbing
of fingers and shouting and accusations”.

FOWLER:
It wasn’t just the so-called hit piece that upset Assange, he was angry
that the New York Times failed to carry some of the reports on
America’s illicit activities.

ASSANGE: “The New York Times had been censoring its material, attacking an alleged
source and attacking us as an organisation for its own strategic purposes”.

FOWLER: WikiLeaks alliance with the old media was on the rocks but the fallout from
Cablegate
wouldn’t end there. More damage was on the way, courtesy of a WikiLeaks
underling by the name of Herbert Snorrason. Wide-eyed and enthusiastic
when
he joined, Snorrason soon found himself in the bitter cross-fire between Assange and Domscheit-Berg.

HERBERT SNORRASON: [Former WikiLeaks volunteer] “The most specific disagreement I
had with Julian was that he alleged that Daniel acted maliciously and
that Daniel was after Julian’s job. I requested evidence because I was
sceptical of the claim”.

FOWLER: “Can you tell me the language that he used when he spoke to you?”

HERBERT SNORRASON: “Ah (laughs) yeah there is a quote that circulated quite
widely, ‘I am the heart and soul of this organisation - its founder,
philosopher, original coder’. I really don’t remember the entire
list..... and ending with ‘if you have a problem with me you can piss
off’.”

ASSANGE: “I think I told him very soundly to piss
off. You know we were trying to get on with things and it wasn’t useful
to have an Icelandic student hectoring the CEO of an organisation during
a time of high stress”.

HERBERT SNORRASON: “My immediate reply was so be it. I left and I have not spoken with Julian since”.

FOWLER:
It might have paid Assange to treat Snorrason better. On a flight home
to Iceland, he read a book written by two Guardian reporters Assange had
teamed up, with to produce the Cablegate stories. Incredibly there in
black and white they’d printed a password, confidentially given to them
by Assange to open the encrypted Cablegate files. The files had been
placed on the internet for safe keeping in case anything happened to
Assange.

HERBERT SNORRASON: “My immediate reaction when I noticed the password was, holy crap this isn’t happening”.

FOWLER:
Snorrason drove to his grandparents’ home close to Reykjavik Airport.
If the password opened the cables, all the names of US informants would
be revealed. Snorrason fired up his computer and carefully typed in the
code. Seconds later the Cablegate internet file opened up.

HERBERT
SNORRASON: “I immediately realised that this would be something that
was very dangerous. My main concern was that the release of those
documents could put people’s lives at risk”.

FOWLER: Snorrason contacted his friend Domscheit-Berg in Germany to tell him what he’d found.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “Sharing the password for the master copy was I think a
big mistake and there’s not really any excuse for that other than being lazy”.

FOWLER:
Not far from central Berlin, Der Freitag, a radical newspaper with a
tiny circulation, splashed the story. We can now reveal the principle
source was none other than Daniel
Domscheit-Berg.

“What do
you say to the argument that by talking to Freitag, by pointing them in
the direction of the file and the password, the key, that you made it
likely that that information would be available, unredacted around the
world?”

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It’s just a matter of time until somebody intelligent
would
have put one and one together and anyone putting in resources into
finding these cables because they had an interest in obtaining access to
the cables was probably, has known that for quite some time already”.

FOWLER: “But you helped speed it up”.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “No I don’t.... well I don’t know. You could..... you could allege that I did. I don’t know if I did”.

FOWLER:
That the code printed in the Guardian book was a grave error of
judgement by the authors mattered not a jot. WikiLeaks looked as if its
security was slack. For Daniel Domscheit-Berg it vindicated his stand
against WikiLeaks.

DANIEL DOMSCHEIT-BERG: “It is important for
the world to understand the general issue at hand because people are
potentially risking their lives trusting in the ability to handle
information
properly. We were not just making this up in order to find an excuse
for sabotaging WikiLeaks or for spreading dirt you know?”

ASSANGE:
“I assume it was probably not malicious the putting of the password in
the book, it was just extremely arrogant and careless. Where there may
be genuine criticism levelled at me and the decision making of the
organisation, is that actually we trusted The Guardian”.

FOWLER:
With the names of spies and informants revealed, Assange decided to
publish the full cables on the WikiLeaks website arguing that everyone
should have access and not those simply in the know, such as corrupt
dictatorships and their intelligence organisations.

ASSANGE:
“Given that the material had already been published, at that stage we
determined that well actually we have to give this to the public, we
have to give this to the journalists, we have to give this to human
rights workers”.

FOWLER: WikiLeaks polarises opinion.
It’s either a force for good or a dangerous enemy of the state.
Whatever the case,
with the Architect gone,
it’s now effectively closed for new business,
unable to take whistle blowers’ electronic submissions.

“When will it be on line again?”

ASSANGE: “Some time… I don’t know”.

FOWLER: “When will you be open to take submissions again, electronic submissions?”

ASSANGE: “I’m not sure…”.

FOWLER: “Will it be one month, two months, six months?”

ASSANGE: “I imagine before the end of the year”.

FOWLER:
But right now Assange has other more important concerns. Here at the
High Court in London the ruling on his extradition to Sweden is
imminent.
At the same time a US Grand Jury is investigating if
there’s sufficient evidence to indict him on charges of spying against
the United States.

GEOFFREY
ROBERTSON: “Under the US Espionage Act there are sections that do carry
the death penalty. For that reason I suspect he wouldn’t be extradited
on those charges but there are lesser charges that carry up to ten years
imprisonment and that is what he
would face, ten years in a maximum security prison”.

FOWLER: No matter what the outcome in the United States, Julian Assange can expect little help from Australia.

JENNIFER ROBINSON: “We had the Australian Prime Minister come out and accuse him
of illegal conduct which was manifestly untrue and was proven as such
by an Australian Federal Police investigation in Australia, so her
comments were both prejudicial and premature. We also had the Attorney
General, Robert McClelland suggesting that they may cancel Julian’s
passport. Now as an Australian living abroad myself, I found that to be a
shocking statement to come from our Government, that the Australian
Government would be so quick to accuse rather than protect an Australian
living abroad and I think that’s of grave concern and one that the
Australian public ought to take up with our politicians”.

ASSANGE: “Well the Prime Minister and the Attorney General are US lackeys. I mean it’s as simple as that”.

IAIN OVERTON: “I really admire the man. I mean he’s getting a huge amount of
flack from all sides but he’s actually by releasing all this
information, he’s created a complete hellhole for his life. He didn’t
have to do it and yet what he’s done is just remarkable”.

FOWLER:
Julian Assange set out to challenge the media and government secrecy.
WikiLeaks has given a penetrating insight into the covert world of war
and politics. Now he and his organisation face their severest test, the
struggle for survival.

can't stop the internet, you type an Oh & the world wide web gushes like a woman scratching herself with a husquvarna

[daddlepoms]

Steevo,banned??? He just come back from inactive.Biblegirl,Pumma...good people,she should've been mod years ago,Biblegirl.I remember Limelady saying no-one is in-expendable,as she found years later,but to lose good people,then the energy will be black,and many little trolls will have fun.

Steevo,banned,shiiiiit man,he was a popular dude,sensible,mostly.Many friends have said,it's not the same since I left,no,nothing to do with me,....the place changed,in alot of ways,they fucked themselves up,management,they did alot of things to counter arguements like this place and Infinite Love have been saying for years,should've tended their own flocks,than worrying about scattered wolf packs.

It's like Tiswas talking about Infidelyork,being a anti - Icke mod,no,he just does'nt agree with it,but no-one realises LookFar,doesn't go with the Reptoid "Theory",either...But she's pretty sweet,hell good looking (for a blonde) English girl.

That's where you guys make the mistakes,thinking it's all Icke worship,it isn't,the last person that wants worship,is Icke...he's going to get it anyway,New Age Groupies,looking for the next messianic figure to lead them over the rainbow...Poor bastard,envy him not...

well the club is only a pub till you start kicking customers out for drinking.

[daddlepoms]

The Secret Mass Grave Of The David Icke Forum...!!!



I See Myself,
Vera Susa,
Snoops,
Dove Of Numbness As Harx Bullar,
And Masonicboomering On That List...

well done Rod House

[MoMo]

To many good people have gone IMO. How I get to stay bets me

you're hiz fellow NAZI......... Uber alliez and all that shit.............

[daddlepoms]

time for the fag year awards

[Sponsored content]